अपने लकवाग्रस्त पिता के साथ जीवित रहने के लिए संघर्ष कर रही एक तेरह वर्षीय लड़की, वेस्पर, एक महिला से मिलती है जो उसे अपनी बुद्धि, ताकत और जैव-हैकिंग क्षमताओं का उपयोग करने के लिए मजबूर करती... सभी पढ़ेंअपने लकवाग्रस्त पिता के साथ जीवित रहने के लिए संघर्ष कर रही एक तेरह वर्षीय लड़की, वेस्पर, एक महिला से मिलती है जो उसे अपनी बुद्धि, ताकत और जैव-हैकिंग क्षमताओं का उपयोग करने के लिए मजबूर करती है.अपने लकवाग्रस्त पिता के साथ जीवित रहने के लिए संघर्ष कर रही एक तेरह वर्षीय लड़की, वेस्पर, एक महिला से मिलती है जो उसे अपनी बुद्धि, ताकत और जैव-हैकिंग क्षमताओं का उपयोग करने के लिए मजबूर करती है.
- पुरस्कार
- 7 जीत और कुल 10 नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
It's a pretty ambitious attempt, imperfect but I loved it. Most important thing is it needs a sequel to explain everything, because you're just thrown into it with a vague introduction to this dystopian future, you don't get to explore the vastness of this sci-fi world. It's not so unfamiliar though, there hints and cues to help you imagine what life is like outside of those the niche story focuses on, there's so many little side plots that you wouldn't usually pay attention to. When you hear sci-fi especially if you usually only watch movies you might think more of flashy, space travel or aliens, light sabers... but this is the gloomy type that's more accustomed to in tv series, for me at least. So you might be disappointed if you're expecting that. Cinematography is great, despite the bleak setting there's still so much beauty nature offers.
Biggest problem is we don't learn much and there's huge lack of details, but it's a well made low budget sci-fi that deserves a sequel for that reason. To explore the work it's based in. Love dark science fiction.
It's nothing like game of thrones but I'm trying to think of an analogy that'd be widely accepted, so imagine instead of focusing on Westeros affairs, it focuses on a little girl and her father, living on their own in a village in the middle of nowhere. You don't get a picture of the grand scale of things, just a really small piece of a puzzle. That's why I think turning this into a franchise has great potential, because their dystopian future has so much more to explore. The problem is this doesn't feel like a first movie. More like a solo entry to an already established film franchise.
It's something new, a breath of fresh air(gloomy one) and for that I fear that it'll land in the same shoes as Mortal Engines which I loved, because it won't be as widely appreciated by audiences enough to warrant a franchise or even a sequel to explore everything this dystopian world has to offer.
Biggest problem is we don't learn much and there's huge lack of details, but it's a well made low budget sci-fi that deserves a sequel for that reason. To explore the work it's based in. Love dark science fiction.
It's nothing like game of thrones but I'm trying to think of an analogy that'd be widely accepted, so imagine instead of focusing on Westeros affairs, it focuses on a little girl and her father, living on their own in a village in the middle of nowhere. You don't get a picture of the grand scale of things, just a really small piece of a puzzle. That's why I think turning this into a franchise has great potential, because their dystopian future has so much more to explore. The problem is this doesn't feel like a first movie. More like a solo entry to an already established film franchise.
It's something new, a breath of fresh air(gloomy one) and for that I fear that it'll land in the same shoes as Mortal Engines which I loved, because it won't be as widely appreciated by audiences enough to warrant a franchise or even a sequel to explore everything this dystopian world has to offer.
I'm surprised at some of the negative reviews. I think they're thinking in terms of what makes a movie popular and successful at the box office, not what is successful in terms of a piece of literature or art. The narrative back story is subtle, not obvious. So if you're going to do social media on your phone while watching it, you're going to get bored or confused quite quickly. This one is like reading a book on the screen. They're not common but I loved the vibe. It's striking and doesn't over do the sci-fi elements as they paint the atmosphere, not the story. Acting is top notch. Some of these younger stars will be seen more of for sure. First thing I did after watching it was searching if it's a book.
- Great premise, interesting story.
- There is sci-fi scenes pretty much every other scene, meaning they did a great job of filling the sci-fi hunger appetite.
- Botanic and nature emphasis. They did a great job concepting how plant life adapts in the wild after a disaster. Plant life and sustainability plays a big role in this movie.
- The dad character is great. He is a pessimist, the protagonist an optimist.
- Side mysteries are always a great plus. Like the pilgrims and the old labs and the citadels. It gave the movie much more depth.
- The CGI is great.
- The actors are pretty solid as well.
- It's not Hollywood caliber by a long shot, and has more an indie feel to it but that are all great aspects it has going for.
A very watchable dystopian movie from Bruno Samper and Kristina Buozyte.
The most interesting aspect of the film is that either the two directors who also wrote the script of the film or the production designer Henrijs Deicmanis and Raimondas Dicius were heavily influenced by Miyazaki.
The characters in the movie look like they came straight out of the obvious Miyazaki anime.
This is not a bad criticism, it is a choice that fits the texture of the film.
The duo, who had previously filmed Vanishing Waves (2012) together, spent six years on this project and decided at the last minute to shoot the movie in English in order to attract more viewers.
Cinematographer Feliksas Abrukauskas drew on paintings by Johannes Vermeer and Rembrandt for inspiration.
Most of the movie was completed without using the green/blue screen, but the drone used in some scenes was helped by cgi... Because the drone used on the set made a lot of noise and the actors and actresses could not focus on their roles.
The most interesting aspect of the film is that either the two directors who also wrote the script of the film or the production designer Henrijs Deicmanis and Raimondas Dicius were heavily influenced by Miyazaki.
The characters in the movie look like they came straight out of the obvious Miyazaki anime.
This is not a bad criticism, it is a choice that fits the texture of the film.
The duo, who had previously filmed Vanishing Waves (2012) together, spent six years on this project and decided at the last minute to shoot the movie in English in order to attract more viewers.
Cinematographer Feliksas Abrukauskas drew on paintings by Johannes Vermeer and Rembrandt for inspiration.
Most of the movie was completed without using the green/blue screen, but the drone used in some scenes was helped by cgi... Because the drone used on the set made a lot of noise and the actors and actresses could not focus on their roles.
I'm really surprised that this film is not more well known even though I myself had never heard of it! It has a fascinating production design with many unusual, interesting, original and beautiful special effects. The entire film is well made with a very original vision and the lead actress, a young woman named Raffiella Chapman helps a lot with a very solid performance and the rest of the principle cast is fine. This apocalyptic tale also has a very good cinematography and is well directed. It does get a little lost in the latter half though I thought it ended on a strong as well as intriguing note.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाWhile visual effects are present in the movie, they are mostly there to enhance a shot with a plant or a ship, as no scenes were shot against a green screen.
- कनेक्शनReferences La planète sauvage (1973)
- साउंडट्रैकJust a wave
Written & Composed by Yorina
Performed by Yorina
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Vesper?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Хроніки Веспер
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $49,493
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $22,949
- 2 अक्तू॰ 2022
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $16,70,865
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 54 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें