IMDb रेटिंग
4.0/10
2.3 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ें"Plan 9" is a remake of the 1959 science fiction / horror movie "Plan 9 From Outer Space", with Erik Lobo as Criswell."Plan 9" is a remake of the 1959 science fiction / horror movie "Plan 9 From Outer Space", with Erik Lobo as Criswell."Plan 9" is a remake of the 1959 science fiction / horror movie "Plan 9 From Outer Space", with Erik Lobo as Criswell.
Kerry James
- Larry
- (as Kerry James Klapperich)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I think the best visual representation of this film is the last time we see Lt. John Harper. He looks exactly like he does from the original-goofy trench coat, silly fedora, waves his gun around like an idiot. Sadly he only lasts less than a minute as he is quickly devoured by a very modern zombie probably getting all of his insides ripped out in excessive gore.
This Plan 9 has a very different plot to the point where if it weren't for the name I wouldn't connect them at all. The small town of Nilbog (GET IT!!) gets hit by a meteor and all of a sudden, the dead start rising from the grave. Because of this, the quirky citizens of this town have to band together in order to survive as well as find out what is causing this epidemic.
While many of the same characters are here, they have added tons more and the story resembles Night of the Living Dead or most other zombies movies than the original Plan 9. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing but it is an odd choice. In fact remaking Plan 9 from Outer Space is an odd idea altogether. The point of a remake is to take a film that has promise but was held back by it's problems or the technology of the time and make it better. But everybody loves Plan 9 BECAUSE of it's problems and mistakes so why remake it?
The characters are just boring stock characters like the original. The editing and cinematography is good say for a few spots here and there. The acting and direction though is pretty lackluster. Most everyone seems to have a straight face during the whole ordeal and taking this whole zombie thing really well-too well! Others though act pretty realistic. Its a mixed bag for sure. The writing feels about the same. It has some good moments and good pieces of dialogue in there-both funny and dramatic-but for the most part, it just feels flat and boring. The worst part is also when something really tragic and dark has just happened so of course moments later, they make a stupid joke or a sarcastic statement. They spend most of the film just running around but because we don't really know all that much about these people, I couldn't care less what happens to them.
The thing that annoys me the most is all of the references. Seriously, they mention Predator, Monster Squad, The Fog, Psycho, Troll 2, The Shining, etc. The fourth wall jokes are pretty annoying too. Normally I like that kind of stuff but it's all about context. The movie isn't a comedy, you are supposed to take it seriously or at least semi-seriously, so those type of jokes feel out of place. It seems like a desperate plea for you to like their movie. The only really new thing it brings to the table is the zombie lore. Apparently the alien menace is sending out these waves of energy that keep bringing the dead back to life. If you get bitten by a zombie, you don't become one but the next wave of energy will turn you into one. The other interesting idea is that each new batch of zombies gets smarter than the last one. It's pretty cool but everything else is pretty standard.
And that's exactly the problem with remaking Plan 9. They actually do make major improvements to the film but because of that, it's no longer that likable. The original Plan 9 from Outer Space could have been much better if put into more skilled hands but in the end, it would have been standard 1950's sci-fi fare. But because a man with little talent, experience or money handled the project, it turned into a gloriously fun mess of a movie. This Plan 9 suffers from not being handled by a modern Ed Wood and instead winds up being on about the same level as those awful Syfy channel movies. Not the worst I have ever seen (heck the original Plan 9 is a thousand times worse) but it doesn't do anything really that fun or interesting with itself. If you want to see a modern version of a 50's sci-fi flick go see The Lost Skeleton of Cadavera. That one is actually funny and isn't afraid to embrace it's roots.
This Plan 9 has a very different plot to the point where if it weren't for the name I wouldn't connect them at all. The small town of Nilbog (GET IT!!) gets hit by a meteor and all of a sudden, the dead start rising from the grave. Because of this, the quirky citizens of this town have to band together in order to survive as well as find out what is causing this epidemic.
While many of the same characters are here, they have added tons more and the story resembles Night of the Living Dead or most other zombies movies than the original Plan 9. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing but it is an odd choice. In fact remaking Plan 9 from Outer Space is an odd idea altogether. The point of a remake is to take a film that has promise but was held back by it's problems or the technology of the time and make it better. But everybody loves Plan 9 BECAUSE of it's problems and mistakes so why remake it?
The characters are just boring stock characters like the original. The editing and cinematography is good say for a few spots here and there. The acting and direction though is pretty lackluster. Most everyone seems to have a straight face during the whole ordeal and taking this whole zombie thing really well-too well! Others though act pretty realistic. Its a mixed bag for sure. The writing feels about the same. It has some good moments and good pieces of dialogue in there-both funny and dramatic-but for the most part, it just feels flat and boring. The worst part is also when something really tragic and dark has just happened so of course moments later, they make a stupid joke or a sarcastic statement. They spend most of the film just running around but because we don't really know all that much about these people, I couldn't care less what happens to them.
The thing that annoys me the most is all of the references. Seriously, they mention Predator, Monster Squad, The Fog, Psycho, Troll 2, The Shining, etc. The fourth wall jokes are pretty annoying too. Normally I like that kind of stuff but it's all about context. The movie isn't a comedy, you are supposed to take it seriously or at least semi-seriously, so those type of jokes feel out of place. It seems like a desperate plea for you to like their movie. The only really new thing it brings to the table is the zombie lore. Apparently the alien menace is sending out these waves of energy that keep bringing the dead back to life. If you get bitten by a zombie, you don't become one but the next wave of energy will turn you into one. The other interesting idea is that each new batch of zombies gets smarter than the last one. It's pretty cool but everything else is pretty standard.
And that's exactly the problem with remaking Plan 9. They actually do make major improvements to the film but because of that, it's no longer that likable. The original Plan 9 from Outer Space could have been much better if put into more skilled hands but in the end, it would have been standard 1950's sci-fi fare. But because a man with little talent, experience or money handled the project, it turned into a gloriously fun mess of a movie. This Plan 9 suffers from not being handled by a modern Ed Wood and instead winds up being on about the same level as those awful Syfy channel movies. Not the worst I have ever seen (heck the original Plan 9 is a thousand times worse) but it doesn't do anything really that fun or interesting with itself. If you want to see a modern version of a 50's sci-fi flick go see The Lost Skeleton of Cadavera. That one is actually funny and isn't afraid to embrace it's roots.
I had the opportunity to watch the 2015 movie "Plan 9" here in 2025, and opted to do so, without really knowing what I was getting myself into.
The story is adequate, but it sort of settles into a monotonous slump and never really gets off the runway. Watchable, yes, but the movie was just lacking a certain ingredient to bedazzle the audience and take the audience on a thrill-ride. Granted, I haven't watched the 1957 movie 1957 movie "Plan 9 from Outer Space" from writer and director Edward D. Wood Jr., so I don't know how much of a direct remake this 2015 movie was, or if it was an homage movie if not a remake.
Of the entire cast ensemble in the movie, the only familiar face on the screen for me was actor Brian Krause. The majority of the acting performances in the movie were fair, but you're not in for an evening of Shakespearian theater here.
While I did find that the special effects and make-up and prosthetic effects in the movie were adequate, much of the effects had a rather low budget and low key feel to it, for better or worse. However, there wasn't really much of any consistency between the infected, because some had milky-glazed-over eyes, whereas others had their regular eye color. I love how the corpses that came out of the graves were spotless clean, not a single speck of dirt on them. Yeah, that was very logical, and what a rookie mistake for director John Johnson to make.
"Plan 9" is a low budget sci-fi horror movie in the higher ends of the low budget scale. There is something about it which makes it watchable enough, but you're not in for a stellar viewing experience.
My rating of director John Johnson's 2015 "Plan 9" lands on a flat five out of ten stars.
The story is adequate, but it sort of settles into a monotonous slump and never really gets off the runway. Watchable, yes, but the movie was just lacking a certain ingredient to bedazzle the audience and take the audience on a thrill-ride. Granted, I haven't watched the 1957 movie 1957 movie "Plan 9 from Outer Space" from writer and director Edward D. Wood Jr., so I don't know how much of a direct remake this 2015 movie was, or if it was an homage movie if not a remake.
Of the entire cast ensemble in the movie, the only familiar face on the screen for me was actor Brian Krause. The majority of the acting performances in the movie were fair, but you're not in for an evening of Shakespearian theater here.
While I did find that the special effects and make-up and prosthetic effects in the movie were adequate, much of the effects had a rather low budget and low key feel to it, for better or worse. However, there wasn't really much of any consistency between the infected, because some had milky-glazed-over eyes, whereas others had their regular eye color. I love how the corpses that came out of the graves were spotless clean, not a single speck of dirt on them. Yeah, that was very logical, and what a rookie mistake for director John Johnson to make.
"Plan 9" is a low budget sci-fi horror movie in the higher ends of the low budget scale. There is something about it which makes it watchable enough, but you're not in for a stellar viewing experience.
My rating of director John Johnson's 2015 "Plan 9" lands on a flat five out of ten stars.
This film rated 6.3 when watched, 2 days later I see its 4.7 The film is very annoying on a number of reasons - it jumps around in timelines unclearly, the acting is not natural, the characters do not relate together on a credible scale and the whole story is unfinished without imparting viewer satisfaction or completion.
It smacks of a teenage splatter movie where they all enter the darkened room without turning the light on and get slaughtered one by one...it was not trying to be, but that was the result.
It didn't achieve on an intellectual scale what they were trying to do, and the entertainment factor was missing too. Just annoying really.
It smacks of a teenage splatter movie where they all enter the darkened room without turning the light on and get slaughtered one by one...it was not trying to be, but that was the result.
It didn't achieve on an intellectual scale what they were trying to do, and the entertainment factor was missing too. Just annoying really.
I have seen a lot of zombie/horror films and I have to say that this one was very palatable. The acting was sub par and the story line was pretty good for been a low budget film. I laughed a few good times out loud at the crazy things that no sane or even insane person would do. But isn't that what makes a good campy horror film. "Dont go in there!" "Shoot him, don't walk away" and so on. Worth the time if you have the time. If you want to go watch a mainstream horror film and be bored half way though, then by God, go and do that. But I like to be entertained to the point of not switching it off after 10 minutes. I always give movies 5 minutes, then 5 minutes more if I am intrigued. I stuck with this till the end, no second guessing!
You can tell if a movie comes from the heart or from wanting to cash in on a quick buck. This remake is a good example of what fans of the original film can make as a love letter to Ed Wood.
There are some changes between the original and this remake but it was done with a loving and caring hand.
If you enjoy B movies this is one to catch.
There are some changes between the original and this remake but it was done with a loving and caring hand.
If you enjoy B movies this is one to catch.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe movie is a remake of the 1959 Edward D. Wood Jr. cult film Plan 9 from Outer Space (1957), which is widely regarded as being one of the worst films ever made due to its nonsensical plot, shoddy production values and incompetent direction. This remake however is not intended to be a parody, but rather a "good" version of the story, intending to be a realization of Wood's original vision, should he have had the necessary budget to achieve it.
- भाव
Lucy Grimm: Ghostbusters quote, "Back off man, I'm a scientist."
- कनेक्शनReferenced in DVD/Lazerdisc/VHS collection 2016 (2016)
- साउंडट्रैकLove is Strange
Performed by Jonathan Tiersten
Words and Music by Ethel Smith, pseudonym of Bo Diddley and Mickey Baker
Courtesy of Darkstone Entertainment
Orignal Artists Mickey & Sylvia
Produced by Jonathan Tiersten
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Plan 9?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 43 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें