Whispers
- 2015
- 1 घं 30 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
4.0/10
9.1 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA young couple grieving the recent death of their daughter move to the countryside where they are haunted by their tragedy and a sinister darkness.A young couple grieving the recent death of their daughter move to the countryside where they are haunted by their tragedy and a sinister darkness.A young couple grieving the recent death of their daughter move to the countryside where they are haunted by their tragedy and a sinister darkness.
- पुरस्कार
- 3 कुल नामांकन
Emma Julia Jacobs
- The Nanny
- (as Emma Jacobs)
Rebecca Olsen
- The Demon
- (वॉइस)
Harrison Cade
- Harry
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Eileen Dietz
- The Demon
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
This is absolutely one of the worst movies I have ever watched. What is worst is the high average rating it received and users calling it great horror and a dark ghost story - this is all lies. By the end of the movie you are more confused than what you were at the start. The main character Catherine is probably the weakest and most cliché female horror character that appears in a movie - throughout the entire film you just wish Catherine could disappear. No connection was established regarding the apparitions and the characters and the story did not go any deeper into the history of the apparent haunting. What was this movie about?
Take a look at them. Most are made by people who have been "members" on IMDb for as long as the lifespan of a Mayfly.
These writings are clearly made by shills. This is the most blatant abuse of IMDb reviews I have ever seen. You'd think they would try harder with their scam to make it seem more convincing.
Why put all that effort into covering for a below average genre vehicle when they could've, instead, put the effort into making a good movie?
These writings are clearly made by shills. This is the most blatant abuse of IMDb reviews I have ever seen. You'd think they would try harder with their scam to make it seem more convincing.
Why put all that effort into covering for a below average genre vehicle when they could've, instead, put the effort into making a good movie?
I am giving this a 2 because it had some interesting photography, and a few good ghost scenes.
The reviews that say this title is good, both the critic and user reviews, are all false. This movie is by no means a 7 out of 10.
The photography is poor. This is an MTI offering, and they have not improved with agree. In fact they still use the same intro with the letters MTI bursting out of the theater screen.
The sound is poor, the acting is poor, the plot is poor, and this movie has little if anything to do with what the description at Redbox says it is. It is also not a new title released in 2017, as you can see for yourself here at IMDb.
This is yet another example of a poor offering from Redbox, making you think it is new when it is not. It may be one of MTI's best offerings in the last few years, but their best offering is still worse than any other film company. Asylum Entertainment makes better movies than this - I'm not kidding.
I never say this, and rarely review this critically and low. But in this case it is merited. This title is not worth renting, save your money. I would not say this unless it was true. There s absolutely no redeemable quality to this movie. It may have a haunted house, but it is not even very good as a "haunted house" movie.
I hope IMDb at least cracks down in this illegitimate critic reviews that lead you to believe this movie is good. They are blatantly lying.
The reviews that say this title is good, both the critic and user reviews, are all false. This movie is by no means a 7 out of 10.
The photography is poor. This is an MTI offering, and they have not improved with agree. In fact they still use the same intro with the letters MTI bursting out of the theater screen.
The sound is poor, the acting is poor, the plot is poor, and this movie has little if anything to do with what the description at Redbox says it is. It is also not a new title released in 2017, as you can see for yourself here at IMDb.
This is yet another example of a poor offering from Redbox, making you think it is new when it is not. It may be one of MTI's best offerings in the last few years, but their best offering is still worse than any other film company. Asylum Entertainment makes better movies than this - I'm not kidding.
I never say this, and rarely review this critically and low. But in this case it is merited. This title is not worth renting, save your money. I would not say this unless it was true. There s absolutely no redeemable quality to this movie. It may have a haunted house, but it is not even very good as a "haunted house" movie.
I hope IMDb at least cracks down in this illegitimate critic reviews that lead you to believe this movie is good. They are blatantly lying.
First and foremost, for anyone skeptical about the widespread accusations of fake, highly positive reviews for this movie, there is good news. All you have to do is watch the trailer, or the first few minutes, to find out how much of a joke it is. Really. It's that conspicuously bad.
I am entirely certain that the vast majority of raving reviews posted for this film on IMDb are fake. The filmmakers have obviously run a sadly successful campaign of spamming the site with sham accounts, and as another reviewer has pointed out, the ages of these accounts give them away.
I have also looked into many of these accounts to find that "Whispers" is the only film the owner has reviewed since the account's creation. Sloppy and shameful.
On to the actual review:
This movie does one thing well. It manages to be entertaining in its sophomoric attempt at suspense and psychological horror. It does this for about the first ten minutes. Then it's just the kind of bad that makes you want to fall into a deep sleep, and upon waking, express your anger and bewilderment at its IMDb rating.
There isn't much to be said about the film's substance. It has none. The actors are so bad that they turn a substandard horror/thriller script into what plays out like a soap opera. Everything that the film tries to do falls flat. The parts of the script that could have worked as semi-decent horror are utterly ruined by the poor execution of everything from acting to set design, cinematography and editing.
At first, trying to keep an open mind, I thought: maybe surrealism? Absurdism? Maybe it's trying to be this incoherent and ridiculous? I actually couldn't tell if it was intended or if it was simply the generally clunky performance of the actors and filmmakers. However, intended or not, it quickly ceases to be entertaining, and also becomes exceedingly obvious that "Whispers" takes itself very seriously. Eventually, after wasting 90 minutes of my life, I came to the incontrovertible conclusion that, no. This movie is just bad. No need to overthink it. The filmmakers certainly didn't.
I am entirely certain that the vast majority of raving reviews posted for this film on IMDb are fake. The filmmakers have obviously run a sadly successful campaign of spamming the site with sham accounts, and as another reviewer has pointed out, the ages of these accounts give them away.
I have also looked into many of these accounts to find that "Whispers" is the only film the owner has reviewed since the account's creation. Sloppy and shameful.
On to the actual review:
This movie does one thing well. It manages to be entertaining in its sophomoric attempt at suspense and psychological horror. It does this for about the first ten minutes. Then it's just the kind of bad that makes you want to fall into a deep sleep, and upon waking, express your anger and bewilderment at its IMDb rating.
There isn't much to be said about the film's substance. It has none. The actors are so bad that they turn a substandard horror/thriller script into what plays out like a soap opera. Everything that the film tries to do falls flat. The parts of the script that could have worked as semi-decent horror are utterly ruined by the poor execution of everything from acting to set design, cinematography and editing.
At first, trying to keep an open mind, I thought: maybe surrealism? Absurdism? Maybe it's trying to be this incoherent and ridiculous? I actually couldn't tell if it was intended or if it was simply the generally clunky performance of the actors and filmmakers. However, intended or not, it quickly ceases to be entertaining, and also becomes exceedingly obvious that "Whispers" takes itself very seriously. Eventually, after wasting 90 minutes of my life, I came to the incontrovertible conclusion that, no. This movie is just bad. No need to overthink it. The filmmakers certainly didn't.
After reading the reviews of this film and seeing the high rating I was looking forward to watching it. I was really disappointed that it seemed to go nowhere and bored me to death. If you enjoy this movie then more power to you but my fiancé and I hated it. I honestly don't understand the high rating because I found nothing of substance in this film whatsoever. It was so boring in fact that we both fell asleep less than halfway through it. I would avoid wasting your money on this one and that's just my opinion.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाEileen Dietz who played the Demon in the Exorcist had all her scenes cut in the final film but she can still be seen at the end of the teaser trailer.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Whispers?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 30 मि(90 min)
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.78 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें