Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey
ओरिजिनल टाइटल: Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey
कॉलेज जाने वाले क्रिस्टोफर द्वारा त्याग दिए जाने के बाद, विनी और पिगलेट किसी की भी हत्या कर देते हैं, जो ब्लू ड्रीम्स के जंगल में जाने की हिम्मत करता है.कॉलेज जाने वाले क्रिस्टोफर द्वारा त्याग दिए जाने के बाद, विनी और पिगलेट किसी की भी हत्या कर देते हैं, जो ब्लू ड्रीम्स के जंगल में जाने की हिम्मत करता है.कॉलेज जाने वाले क्रिस्टोफर द्वारा त्याग दिए जाने के बाद, विनी और पिगलेट किसी की भी हत्या कर देते हैं, जो ब्लू ड्रीम्स के जंगल में जाने की हिम्मत करता है.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 6 जीत
Richard D. Myers
- Logan
- (as Richard D Myers)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Hard to find anything good about this film. Even the original disney version was scarier. Felt like some school project and the actors where from same school. It would hav been possible to make great film from this story but this was just awful. Only some of the bloody effects where made good. Just read that they gonna make number two and hard to understand why that would be beneficial. Even if i could see this film for free it still would feel like waste of my time.
If you like this film there's something very wrong in you. Pulling nails is more entertaining. Stay away from this piece of phoo.
If you like this film there's something very wrong in you. Pulling nails is more entertaining. Stay away from this piece of phoo.
For a predominantly female cast, I could tell the writer was a male before I even double checked. He must thing all women are complete idiots. Not a single one ever had a plan, all they did was give half-hearted screams and run very, very badly. Of course in his defense, Christopher Robin wasn't much better. It was a snooze fest.
I'd had relatively decent hopes for this. The premise was original and the opening animation was lovely. Another reviewer said if they'd made a short from there, it would've been amazing and I agree. But they fleshed out no plot, spent zero on the costuming of the iconic leads (I'm serious, hitting up a Dollar Tree would've been more affective) and left everything with no resolution at the end, presumably to make room for a sequel.
So, I gave it three stars for the start and for encouraging others to use their talents on works now in the public domain. Hopefully something more interesting and exciting will come from it.
I'd had relatively decent hopes for this. The premise was original and the opening animation was lovely. Another reviewer said if they'd made a short from there, it would've been amazing and I agree. But they fleshed out no plot, spent zero on the costuming of the iconic leads (I'm serious, hitting up a Dollar Tree would've been more affective) and left everything with no resolution at the end, presumably to make room for a sequel.
So, I gave it three stars for the start and for encouraging others to use their talents on works now in the public domain. Hopefully something more interesting and exciting will come from it.
This movie is not a finished product, not even close. This needed AT LEAST a month or two longer in the editing room because it is a mess! I'm not even talking about the terrible story or acting because I knew I was getting that regardless, which is no problem for me as long as there's some carnage. I'm talking about the atrocious sound mixing/editing, the abrupt cuts and transitions, and nauseating camera work. The basics of filmmaking! Whenever someone is getting murdered, you can't even tell what is going on because the camera work is so amateurish and shoddy. It's almost like the camera operator was having a seizure whenever they were supposed to film a kill.
This movie had a $100,000 budget, yet they showed almost no gore/make-up FX when someone would die. If you're filming a low-budget B horror movie, people are going for the kills and not much else, therefore you better be pumping 80% of your budget into the "horror" aspect of the movie and show some people getting slaughtered.
Terrifier 1 had a $25,000 (a fraction of Blood and Honey's budget), yet showed every kill in grisly detail and people LOVED it! Then they made a sequel for $250,000 and made 13 million off it. I'm not sure where the $100,000 budget of this movie went, but it was most definitely not the kills, editing or acting. Maybe Pooh and Piglet's costumes were each $50,000 a piece, and if so the costume designer definitely pocketed that money.
The only reason I'm not giving this a 1 is because I like the concept of taking a fictional character from the public domain and putting a B horror twist on it. Though a good concept, the execution could not have been much worse. This should not have left editing room let alone released IN THEATERS! The distribution company should be held accountable. It's like video game developers releasing unfinished games. Trash.
2/10.
This movie had a $100,000 budget, yet they showed almost no gore/make-up FX when someone would die. If you're filming a low-budget B horror movie, people are going for the kills and not much else, therefore you better be pumping 80% of your budget into the "horror" aspect of the movie and show some people getting slaughtered.
Terrifier 1 had a $25,000 (a fraction of Blood and Honey's budget), yet showed every kill in grisly detail and people LOVED it! Then they made a sequel for $250,000 and made 13 million off it. I'm not sure where the $100,000 budget of this movie went, but it was most definitely not the kills, editing or acting. Maybe Pooh and Piglet's costumes were each $50,000 a piece, and if so the costume designer definitely pocketed that money.
The only reason I'm not giving this a 1 is because I like the concept of taking a fictional character from the public domain and putting a B horror twist on it. Though a good concept, the execution could not have been much worse. This should not have left editing room let alone released IN THEATERS! The distribution company should be held accountable. It's like video game developers releasing unfinished games. Trash.
2/10.
Some horror films are so bad that they're good. This one is just bad.
Nothing is good. The acting, the writing, the plot, the complete and utter lack of even so much as an ATTEMPT at character development, was a complete mess. It's not one of those horrors that are "so bad it's good", it's just painful to sit through from beginning to end. Full of plot holes, completely lacking a protagonist, full of characters who are uninteresting and un-likeable, I can't imagine how anybody could enjoy this movie.
Everyone involved should just quit the movie industry. Their lack of talent, judgement or consideration for their audience shows no compassion or remorse.
Nothing is good. The acting, the writing, the plot, the complete and utter lack of even so much as an ATTEMPT at character development, was a complete mess. It's not one of those horrors that are "so bad it's good", it's just painful to sit through from beginning to end. Full of plot holes, completely lacking a protagonist, full of characters who are uninteresting and un-likeable, I can't imagine how anybody could enjoy this movie.
Everyone involved should just quit the movie industry. Their lack of talent, judgement or consideration for their audience shows no compassion or remorse.
Simply put its a complete disaster, not even comically bad. I love old style slasher horrors & have seen some bad movies. But none have ever been this bad.
The trees in the woods are less wooden than the entire cast and I've seen far superior acting in primary school nativity plays.
Videography and special effects are dismal, as are the costumes. The writing is so bad & confused that it can't decide whether it's in England or the US and the plot is so thin it's near on invisible. The writer had a ready made character set and the world was his oyster. They literally had so many directions they could have taken and yet managed to get it so wrong.
Just don't bother. Watch the trailer & be done with it. That will save you wasting 90 minutes of your life.
The trees in the woods are less wooden than the entire cast and I've seen far superior acting in primary school nativity plays.
Videography and special effects are dismal, as are the costumes. The writing is so bad & confused that it can't decide whether it's in England or the US and the plot is so thin it's near on invisible. The writer had a ready made character set and the world was his oyster. They literally had so many directions they could have taken and yet managed to get it so wrong.
Just don't bother. Watch the trailer & be done with it. That will save you wasting 90 minutes of your life.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाProduction of the film became possible in 2022 after A.A. Milne's novel "Winnie-the-Pooh" (1926) entered the public domain in the United States, which marked the first appearances of Winnie-the-Pooh, Piglet and Christopher Robin. The film's characters could not, however, resemble the Disney versions, who debuted in 1966 and are protected by copyright.
- गूफ़At 48:40, when Piglet is swinging the heavy chain into the pool, the chain floats as the character pulls it back. Chains do not float on water unassisted.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटAfter the credits finish, there is text seen reading "WINNIE-THE-POOH WILL RETURN.", hinting at a sequel.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in AniMat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: Silly Old Deadly Bear (2022)
- साउंडट्रैक3:33
Written by Inas
Performed by Inas
Produced by Sidxkick/Inas
Courtesy of Inas
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनी
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $1,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $20,82,898
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $6,52,482
- 19 फ़र॰ 2023
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $77,17,044
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 24 मि(84 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें