Fred 2: Night of the Living Fred

Fred is your average teenage kid. He sleeps late, acts strange, and doesn't really know the concept of a Low Pitched Voicer. I did not enjoy Fred's high & annoying voice, which made the movie a 2 star movie. I liked the movie a lot, but I just think that Fred's voice needs to change. The movie got poor reception, but I thought the movie was funny, enjoyable, and kind of silly too. What do I mean by silly? Well, Fred hung out in Mr. Devlin's house looking for something in his basement. It did have a very nice ending, as did the other Fred films. I loved the non-stop action when Fred finds out that Mr. Devlin is a vampire, which is not true. Fred imagines that Mr. DEvlin's dangerous since he's a vampire, but once again, he's not dangerous because he's NOT a vampire! It's like saying I'm a Newfoundland dog or something. The movie was a little nutty, but that's okay, because it still made sense. The characters included a new girl named Talia, Fred's friend Bertha, and a few other people, like Mr. Devlin. It sounds crazy, but I actually thought Fred was hysterically funny! The movie was phenomenal! I was so jubilant to see the movie now look at me! I love this movie! I rate it 99 stars!

As a single dad i struggle greatly entertaining my daughter.That was until i found Fred 2: Night of the living Fred (2011). ITS CHANGED MY LIFE!!! Fred is a great conversation starter at the dinner table and a good measure on how much her boyfriends know about good films. Fred is definitely an important part to mine and hers life and i really hope that Fred 3 is just as good. To any depressed single dads or up and coming film makers it truly is a must watch. 10/10

It's not perfect quality, and that's fine. It's rich in character and that's what I like about it so much, I grew up with this film and it still doesn't fail to be entertaining. I personally really think movies don't have to have perfect acting or editing, this movie is fun and entertaining. Isn't that what matters most?

Even after more than 10 years this movie still holds the same amount of character it did when it first came out, and i'll admit, the first film wasn't all that good. Which personally makes this movie even better, it was much more than the original. I also appreciated the incorporated running jokes (such as John Cena coming out of nowhere)

I stumbled upon this by accident. I honestly hit play just to see how dumb it was. It surprised me by making me laugh. Don't come into this movie taking it serious. It's supposed to make u laugh. Only thing... Fred should just come out of the closet bc it would be so much funnier if he were out and not chasing.. girls..

The first movie was unwatchable and one of the worst movies ever made. Fred 2 is a smidgen better, but that is saying very little as it is still horrible in every department. Of the acting, the best performance comes from Siobhan Fallon who has some comic timing that are wasted by how badly written the movie is. John Cena is also amusing and watchable at least. The rest however either can't do anything with their roles or are a real annoyance. Lucas Cruishank is the absolute worst, he can't act out of a paper bag and if there is a voice more painfully ear-splitting it's personally yet to be heard.

The characters are some of the most obnoxious and stupid ever, while the writing is lazy, has no heart or charm and is not funny at all. The WWE skit was just embarrassing. The story is very thin and predictable, nowhere near enough to sustain nearly an hour and a half. Not to mention so idiotic that it insults the intelligence, as well as losing any kind of energy in the second half. There are parody-like scenes here and there but they suffer from being too obvious and being very poorly written that they are in no way funny or scary. Fred 2 looks cheap too, it never rises above hurriedly made made for TV quality and the settings are gaudy and lifeless.

All in all, at least it's not as bad as the first but it is still horrible. 1/10 Bethany Cox