Tu xia chuan qi

This is a shameful rip off of Kung Fu Panda, here are some examples how they are too similar. 1. Panda/Rabbit are chefs. 2. Panda/Rabbit going to a place where Kung Fu was born. 3. Panda/Rabbit having the same Bruce Lee battle cry. 4. Panda/Rabbit's master have the name as Shifu. 5. Same trailer music and announcer. 6. Too similar in a few locations. 7. Same body design as Panda and Tai Lung, but drawn over with more clothes and replaced with a rabbit and a panda. 8. Same knock out in trailer 1:45-48 is the same Tai Lung's fight with the rhinos when he makes a jail break.

If this is true, then why in the name of the Oscars is Hollywood not doing anything about this like Dream-works suing this director named Lijun Sun. And to you actors/actresses, you all should be ashamed. Michael Clarke Duncan should have went up to the director and say, "This is too similar to Kung Fu Panda for I was in the first and second film. The script, the plot, and everything stinks like a Razzie Award and I was in Dare-Devil for crying out loud. Stop ripping it off sir or you face copy right lawyers, the FBI, angry fans, and my fists!!"

If you have watched Kung Fu panda, don't watch this. The contrast will be brutally incomparable. The story revolve around a fat rabbit who has acquire the life-long kungfu aura of Shifu (a monkey). The fat rabbit will eventually uphold justice by defeating the bad ass Panda.

Almost the same storyline but a lot more dull and boring. Animation was as poor as what you will see in a mediocre Nickelodeon computer generated graphics. A good analogy will be a wanna-be China made World of Warcraft program.

A recent interview with the voice cast of the movie states that the comparison of this movie with Kungfu Panda is inevitable. It also mean that this movie is as good as the latter having been compared to it. I have a gut feeling that audience will feel cheated should they believe that statement.

So if you want to watch some animation with your kids, watching Nickelodeon isn't a bad idea and the storyline is shorter without the agony of going through a wanna-be movie. By the way, there are better 3D movies out there anyway.

No matter if you know or ignore the film is still nothing half and nothing whole.

He has a nice carefree way, but he is optically so mediocre and meaningless that nothing will remain in the memory.

The character design is a bit too Catholic, the textures are too weak, the animation itself is a bit too slapstick for my taste. This is one of the few martial arts films that clearly differentiate between martial arts and acrobatics. And you couldn't quite decide whether to give the animals realistic or abstract colors. I liked the film but it is not worth looking at again. Small children will have fun with it but only recommended if there is really nothing better to find there is a good gap filler. This is truly a children's film through and through because it is more of a content and narrative style for children and because children do not yet have the cognitive skills to follow abstract thinking processes or complex actions and they are fed with shallow food anyway before being served a lobster. besides, the film has almost no extras almost every scene and setting feels really empty I really thought in the beginning the main character lives in a ghost town

But here are a few things the film did well: 1. The film is entertaining, 2. The film is not silly 3. The film knows when to be funny 4. The film knows when to be serious 5. All battles are as fast as they are dynamic 6. Although the main villain in this film is very passive, you have given a lot of personality through his fighting style and presented it as a serious threat 7. the last fight is surprisingly exciting and surprisingly hard compared to the rest of the film, which is why the win feels all the sweeter

A lame copy of Kung Fu Panda. The animation burned my eyes out. The jokes were so mediocre my four year old brother could've made them up. This is all just a copy of Kung Fu Panda. Let's see:

Lets look at all the facts that this is a copy of Kung Fu Panda. The master guy is named Shifu, such in Kung Fu Panda. Both Fu and Po from Kung Fu Panda are fat bakers. The bad guy in Kung Fu Rabbit looks just like Tai Lung except with more clothes. Tai Lung uses a flaming paw chi attack in Kung Fu Panda 1, and the panda bad guy from Kung Fu Rabbit also uses a flaming paw thing. Kung Fu Rabbit came out after Kung Fu Panda.

Kung Fu Rabbit has horrible animation, jokes, and story line. My brother wasted an hour and a half of my day telling me to watch it. This movie is a poor loser. This movie shouldn't even exist. Why would they waste their time making a movie if everyone will hate it because Kung Fu Panda exists? My friends hate Kung Fu Panda, yet they still agree it's a lot better than Kung Fu Rabbit. Needless to say, this movie is very bad.

*sits in the corner of the cold shower and cries* Why does this exist? This is what happens if you use Kung Fu panda as toilet paper after going to Taco Bell. This movie needs Jesus This is the Detroit version of kung fu panda. If your family doesn't love you they take you to this movie. This movie contained blackface and ablest slurs, triggering me. I can not say this movie is the g rating it received. The antagonist sounded like he was gargling semen violently. The animation made my eyesight worse. Seriously, name any inanimate object, it was probably animated better than the main characters.

Over all, i would have rather eat led paint than watch this movie.