दूरस्थ विश्व के युवा ब्रह्माण्ड के सबसे भयानक जीवन रूप से मुकाबला करते हैं.दूरस्थ विश्व के युवा ब्रह्माण्ड के सबसे भयानक जीवन रूप से मुकाबला करते हैं.दूरस्थ विश्व के युवा ब्रह्माण्ड के सबसे भयानक जीवन रूप से मुकाबला करते हैं.
- 1 ऑस्कर के लिए नामांकित
- 14 जीत और कुल 51 नामांकन
Annemarie Griggs
- Voice of MU
- (वॉइस)
- …
Elemér Szatmári
- Lewd Dude
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
सारांश
Reviewers say 'Alien: Romulus' is lauded for its visual and practical effects, and its respectful nod to the original films. The tense atmosphere, strong performances by Cailee Spaeny and David Jonsson, and effective use of sound and cinematography are highlighted. However, criticisms include reliance on fan service, lack of originality, and overuse of callbacks. Issues with character development, pacing, and CGI usage are also noted. Despite these flaws, many find it an enjoyable and thrilling addition to the franchise.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Positives first - Good action, great practical special effects, and nice visuals.
Director Fede Alvarez and his production team have captured the gloomy atmosphere of Alien, and the thrilling action of Aliens almost perfectly. The action was thrilling with some scary moments.
The use of practical effects and realistic miniatures was so refreshing to see in this age of CGI overkill. Seeing a fully realised Xenomorph in the flesh blew me away, and the Space scenes were beautiful. This camera work, visual presentation, and use of quality albeit limited CGI when necessary was excellent.
Negatives - Average acting, nostalgia bait story, copy & pasted dialogue from better Alien movies, and the inclusion of lore elements from the inferior prequels which I wish did not exist in official canon. Plus the reveal of the villain was an "oh, get out of here " moment, I will say no more.
Apart from the great lead actress Spaeny playing up her role, the other cast of actors/characters was just okay. I thought the nostalgia bait story was boring, eye-rolling, and almost 4th wall breaking, it ruined the immersion for me. I'm getting bored of sequels/prequels heavily relying on lazy "remember-berries" to get a kick out of the casual audience while making the Alien fans embarrassed almost angry. To be honest it's just lazy script writing, and disrespectful to the other Alien movies that did it first!. Unnecessary.
Also the overuse of copy & pasted dialogue from the better Sigourney Weaver Alien movies was very cringe. 20th Century Studios should've called it Alien: Remember because of the over-reliance on oh you remember this bit from.. Lastly, trying to inject all the controversial and franchise damaging Prometheus nonsense into the film was frustrating, I hated all that origin of the Space Jockey and creation of the Xenomorph rubbish. And don't get me started on the villain, I don't want to spoil anything, but it was laughably lazy.
I think setting the movie between the first 2 films was a mistake because you have to make your movie fit into the established continuity of the franchise with all the tie ins and plot beats required to make it fit. They should've done a sequel set years after Alien: Resurrection, and setup the start of a brand new Alien saga long after Weavers adventures (and with better writers onboard).
This had the potential to be right up there with Aliens, but due to disappointing characters, a lacklustre "remember-berry" story, and poor script, it was a let down. Alien: Romulus, an above average Alien greatest hits movie, 4th best film in the franchise.
Director Fede Alvarez and his production team have captured the gloomy atmosphere of Alien, and the thrilling action of Aliens almost perfectly. The action was thrilling with some scary moments.
The use of practical effects and realistic miniatures was so refreshing to see in this age of CGI overkill. Seeing a fully realised Xenomorph in the flesh blew me away, and the Space scenes were beautiful. This camera work, visual presentation, and use of quality albeit limited CGI when necessary was excellent.
Negatives - Average acting, nostalgia bait story, copy & pasted dialogue from better Alien movies, and the inclusion of lore elements from the inferior prequels which I wish did not exist in official canon. Plus the reveal of the villain was an "oh, get out of here " moment, I will say no more.
Apart from the great lead actress Spaeny playing up her role, the other cast of actors/characters was just okay. I thought the nostalgia bait story was boring, eye-rolling, and almost 4th wall breaking, it ruined the immersion for me. I'm getting bored of sequels/prequels heavily relying on lazy "remember-berries" to get a kick out of the casual audience while making the Alien fans embarrassed almost angry. To be honest it's just lazy script writing, and disrespectful to the other Alien movies that did it first!. Unnecessary.
Also the overuse of copy & pasted dialogue from the better Sigourney Weaver Alien movies was very cringe. 20th Century Studios should've called it Alien: Remember because of the over-reliance on oh you remember this bit from.. Lastly, trying to inject all the controversial and franchise damaging Prometheus nonsense into the film was frustrating, I hated all that origin of the Space Jockey and creation of the Xenomorph rubbish. And don't get me started on the villain, I don't want to spoil anything, but it was laughably lazy.
I think setting the movie between the first 2 films was a mistake because you have to make your movie fit into the established continuity of the franchise with all the tie ins and plot beats required to make it fit. They should've done a sequel set years after Alien: Resurrection, and setup the start of a brand new Alien saga long after Weavers adventures (and with better writers onboard).
This had the potential to be right up there with Aliens, but due to disappointing characters, a lacklustre "remember-berry" story, and poor script, it was a let down. Alien: Romulus, an above average Alien greatest hits movie, 4th best film in the franchise.
A few hours after coming out of the theater and I'm not sure what to make of this. It was... okay, I guess?
It felt like Fedy Alvarez examined the production of each of the previous films, and every left-over idea from them was thrown finally to the screen, along with rehashing the core components of the franchise. You have pieces from Alien, Aliens, Resurrection, and Prometheus/Covenant. For a fan of the series, there are subtle and not-so-subtle easter eggs every few minutes, from sound effects to reused dialogue.
The plot is really simple, as it should be. A group of people exploring a space station. Been there, done that. However, I really liked the use of temperature and gravity in this film, those were something not seen much in this universe. And there were plenty of jump scares. I'm not usually a fan of those, but this time they worked well.
The two lead actors were pretty good, the rest rather forgettable. And not sure what to make of the beyond-the-grave role of one actor...
The world is great. Forget the sleek and clean world of Prometheus, this is back to the ugly 70s retro futuristic stuff. Simply lovely. Aesthetically pleasing, if you like this kind of look.
Finally, however, it does feel like there is really nowhere for this franchise to go in terms of story. I wouldn't call it artistically bankrupt, but it is close. While this film tied neatly together the "proper" Alien films and the new Prometheus sidestep, it is hard to think what more to make of this creature. Nearly all the mystery has been stripped from the Xenomorph. I do wonder, is there anything left to do with this creature? More stand-alone films?
It felt like Fedy Alvarez examined the production of each of the previous films, and every left-over idea from them was thrown finally to the screen, along with rehashing the core components of the franchise. You have pieces from Alien, Aliens, Resurrection, and Prometheus/Covenant. For a fan of the series, there are subtle and not-so-subtle easter eggs every few minutes, from sound effects to reused dialogue.
The plot is really simple, as it should be. A group of people exploring a space station. Been there, done that. However, I really liked the use of temperature and gravity in this film, those were something not seen much in this universe. And there were plenty of jump scares. I'm not usually a fan of those, but this time they worked well.
The two lead actors were pretty good, the rest rather forgettable. And not sure what to make of the beyond-the-grave role of one actor...
The world is great. Forget the sleek and clean world of Prometheus, this is back to the ugly 70s retro futuristic stuff. Simply lovely. Aesthetically pleasing, if you like this kind of look.
Finally, however, it does feel like there is really nowhere for this franchise to go in terms of story. I wouldn't call it artistically bankrupt, but it is close. While this film tied neatly together the "proper" Alien films and the new Prometheus sidestep, it is hard to think what more to make of this creature. Nearly all the mystery has been stripped from the Xenomorph. I do wonder, is there anything left to do with this creature? More stand-alone films?
Alien: Romulus delivers a gritty experience reminiscent of the original film, with impressive world-building and familiar tech that longtime fans of the franchise will appreciate. The movie captures the essence of the Alien universe, offering a standalone story that fits well within the established timeline and cleverly nods to Prometheus.
However, the film's reliance on callbacks to previous entries in the franchise detracts from its originality. While some references are clever, others are forced and cringeworthy.
The introduction of the main character Rain, played by Cailee Spaeny, feels uninspired. We've seen this before - another Ripley. It's actually David Jonsson's character, Andy, who ends up being the most interesting by a long shot. If there is one franchise that would benefit from exploring new characters rather than rehashing old ones, this is it.
Despite these negatives, Romulus is technically impressive. It's beautifully shot, the effects are good, it has some genuine scares, and manages to deliver solid thrills and action scenes that are sure to please. I just wish it were brave enough to carve out its own identity.
However, the film's reliance on callbacks to previous entries in the franchise detracts from its originality. While some references are clever, others are forced and cringeworthy.
The introduction of the main character Rain, played by Cailee Spaeny, feels uninspired. We've seen this before - another Ripley. It's actually David Jonsson's character, Andy, who ends up being the most interesting by a long shot. If there is one franchise that would benefit from exploring new characters rather than rehashing old ones, this is it.
Despite these negatives, Romulus is technically impressive. It's beautifully shot, the effects are good, it has some genuine scares, and manages to deliver solid thrills and action scenes that are sure to please. I just wish it were brave enough to carve out its own identity.
Let me just say that I have been with this franchise since day one. I can remember seeing the original in the cinema before I was a teenager. I have seen and enjoyed all the films many times over and appreciated the less popular ones in the series. Seeing Romulus was a disappointment. Its dark visuals, particularly the opening sequence, had me confused at times. The relevance of the opener became obvious later on. And the dialogue was muffled in spots, and I missed chunks trying to figure out what was said, thus missing the follow up. The story was uninspiring and the Xenomorphs were identical to previous incarnations (for the most part) and close ups of the mouth parts no longer cause fear or dread, just boredom. This is one in the franchise that I may not watch again.
I wasn't pleased to see fumbling and stumbling that rivals the levels of "Alien Covenant" here, where characters do the silliest mistakes in order to get killed. It drains the suspense when in order for characters to die, they must commit the most idiotic displays of decision making cursing the screen. The movie is well-made and the CGI looks good, and if not for the starting parts of the movie (1/3), its quite well paced and balanced between the stuff that's high in action and the bits that are slower. The start felt a bit slow and uninteresting though, there was little to none to imply that this was a movie about Xenomorph or anything related to the franchise.
What I felt was missing was the "Alien" factor, that immersion and suspense felt in the better ones in the franchise, the scale and dread of the Xenomorph, its sophistication and unforgiving ways of being. I can forgive this a little bit because the movie points out its intelligence in a few parts of the movie in alright ways, which was a nice touch to give the lifeform some depth.
Main problem I had with the movie though were the irrational and juvenile choices made and said by the characters. When the whole bunch of characters are dumb and childish except for a few, it drains the fun and suspense out of the movie, replacing them with disappointment and frustration, because this one had such potential to be good, or even great. The movie wasn't bad by any means in my opinion, but having such lackluster characters definitely makes it significantly worse.
For the fans of the franchise, I can still recommend this movie if you haven't yet seen it, it has solid visuals and if you can forgive the idiot characters, decent suspense. For anyone else I cannot recommend it though, as I feel that would warrant a rating better than what I got for this film.
6/10.
What I felt was missing was the "Alien" factor, that immersion and suspense felt in the better ones in the franchise, the scale and dread of the Xenomorph, its sophistication and unforgiving ways of being. I can forgive this a little bit because the movie points out its intelligence in a few parts of the movie in alright ways, which was a nice touch to give the lifeform some depth.
Main problem I had with the movie though were the irrational and juvenile choices made and said by the characters. When the whole bunch of characters are dumb and childish except for a few, it drains the fun and suspense out of the movie, replacing them with disappointment and frustration, because this one had such potential to be good, or even great. The movie wasn't bad by any means in my opinion, but having such lackluster characters definitely makes it significantly worse.
For the fans of the franchise, I can still recommend this movie if you haven't yet seen it, it has solid visuals and if you can forgive the idiot characters, decent suspense. For anyone else I cannot recommend it though, as I feel that would warrant a rating better than what I got for this film.
6/10.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाDirector Fede Alvarez sought out the special effects crew from विदेशी 2 (1986) to work on the creatures. Physical sets, practical creatures, and miniatures were used wherever possible to help ground later VFX work.
- गूफ़(at around 2 mins) At the start of the film, a probe finds parts of the wreckage of the Nostromo floating in space near Zeta² Reticuli following its destruction a couple of decades earlier at the end of एलियन (1979). Despite it being dubious there would be any wreckage left after what was such a monumental explosion, any parts of the ship that were not vaporised would not be simply floating in space around the area the explosion happened decades later. The force of the Nostromo's self destruct would have projected remnants of it in all directions at considerable speed, and since this is the vacuum of space, the remnants wouldn't slow down, they would simply keep flying through space at speed.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटThe 20th Century Studios fanfare freezes and turns ominous, as in एलियन³ (1992), leading into the film's opening scene.
The logo itself suffers a burst of static and turns green.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनThe home video version makes some additional digital and animatronic corrections to scenes involving Rook, to make him more closely resemble Ian Holm.
- साउंडट्रैकTheme from 'Alien'
Written by Jerry Goldsmith
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Alien: Romulus?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Quái Vật Không Gian: Romulus
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $8,00,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $10,53,13,091
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $4,20,03,361
- 18 अग॰ 2024
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $35,08,65,342
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 59 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें