अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंHenry 'Hank' Howard works as a scientist in a military lab, trying to create a superhuman formula but with little success. He is also in love with the daughter of his boss, a general. In an ... सभी पढ़ेंHenry 'Hank' Howard works as a scientist in a military lab, trying to create a superhuman formula but with little success. He is also in love with the daughter of his boss, a general. In an effort to earn his approval to marry his daughter, Henry tests the formula on himself, ina... सभी पढ़ेंHenry 'Hank' Howard works as a scientist in a military lab, trying to create a superhuman formula but with little success. He is also in love with the daughter of his boss, a general. In an effort to earn his approval to marry his daughter, Henry tests the formula on himself, inadvertently transforming himself into a purple rage monster and leaving him at the mercy of... सभी पढ़ें
- Det. Lisa Tuttle
- (as Diedre Lyons)
- Sam
- (as Mark Fletcher)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
This movie flips the story. Luring you into the promise of a genuine Z movie, but instead is an extraordinarily lazy, pathetic, painful effort to pump out something straight to ignominious glory. This is not Birdemic. This is not the Miami Connection. It's just crap for crap's sake. Not worthy of dishonorable mention. Just indifference.
There is not one single person from this "film" that should ever work in films again.
Take a bunch of stock footage and animation that couldn't have been made after 1999 and try to build a movie around it using "actors" who are really glorified baristas of waiters and should never be called actors.
The best actor in the film in the bulk and he's laughably badly done.
Everything is done in front of a green screen with tiny sound, badly filmed and badly acted. The director kept blaming a micro-budget but you can find so much better stuff on your average youtube channel.
Speaking of Youtube, check out this review of the "movie". It will give you an even better idea how bad this stinker is. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UE7I5mPHsSU
Story: 1/10
the story doesn't make any sense, there are some many things that don't make sense, and there are many sub plots, that not only are bad, but don't connect with the plot at all.The dialogue in this is movie is terrible, the writer must have take a giant turd on the script to make it this bad,and the whole story is a rip-off of The Increidble Hulk
Acting: 1/10
the actors don't know what acting is, they make their performance so bad, that makes the acting of Troll 2 and The Room look good in comparison
Visual Effects: 1/10
MY GOD, the visual effects of this movie are AWFUL, not only is unbearable to watch, but all is filmed on green screen or in random websites that the director found, it wasn't better to film it in real life environments?, and also the characters models are terrible (like Bulk, a monkey, a dog, Robin Hood)
Characters: 1/10
I just going to resume with this, all the characters are one dimensional or annoying
Editing: 1/10
the editing of this horrible, the transition scenes are poorly made, the characters don't feel like there are in the backgrounds, the are scenes that doesn't make sense and don't have connection with the plot
Conclusion: The Amazing Bulk is maybe the worst movie of all time, everything about it is wrong the acting, writing, directing, editing, visual effects, characters. Don't watch this movie it will make your eyes bleed, and it's not of those movies that are so bad they're good
Overall: 1/10 a perfect example of how not make a movie
As easily the most rip off film ever made. "The Amazing Bulk" is an essential in how not to make a film. With horrible visuals, bad acting, and garbage screenplay: this is a film that should avoided, but like a so bad it's good movie, it's worth at least one watch.
The Story & Characters:
Centering around a scientist who gets turned into a purple monster. This film has some of the worst writing of any film, and most nonsensical plot.
From a villain that makes no sense. And had basically no relavence. He could be taken out the movie, and it wouldn't change that much. To backwards motivations of every character. The film has no understanding of how to write a screenplay.
And when the film tries to be funny, the jokes are just confusing. Like when the villain is messing with some sattelites. It appears that the sattelites are trying to mimic sex. But the joke isn't funny and makes no sense. It's only when it's unintentionally funny, that the film gets a laugh.
The Visuals:
Bad CGI, horrible practical effects, and an over use of bad green screen. Now, many might see me as a hypocrite, claiming this, as I have stated that I like the Star Wars Prequels. And those films notorious for the use of special effects. Well, those films had effects that were very revolutionary for the time. I mean, ILM (the company George Lucas had), had to invent some of the technology themselves. And people loved them back when it came out. But this has no excuse.
First off, even though it was made in 2012, they're somehow than films that came out more than 10 years earlier. And the budget was very low, so the use green screen was a bad choice. It makes every frame look like an episode of "Blue's Clues". And it's embarrassing that thought it looked good. But kind of hilarious.
Conclusion:
This film is terrible. A great example of a bad movie. A movie that gives me a headache when I think about it. But makes me busy out laughing when I watch. This movie sucks, but I love it.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe director of this film found many of the backgrounds on free stock footage websites, that are listed in the credits of the film. He shot the film around what he had, which led to scenes in wine cellars and fields inhabited by leprechauns.
- गूफ़The army general wears the uniform of a staff sergeant. Later the helicopter pilot wears the same uniform, but US Army helicopter pilots are officers.
- भाव
General Darwin: I hate dust! I don't want it building up in my home.
[Hannah and Henry walk into the room]
Hannah Darwin: Hi, daddy.
General Darwin: You let dust build up, and before you know it, you've got an army of dust bunnies plotting to take over. Beautiful flowers, where did you get those from? Our garden?
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटNo CGI animals were harmed in the making of this film
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Obscurus Lupa Presents: No Retreat, No Surrender 2 (2012)
- साउंडट्रैकVivaldi's Spring
By Antonio Vivaldi (as Vivaldi)
टॉप पसंद
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $14,000(अनुमानित)
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 16 मिनट
- रंग