Muzzle
- 2023
- 1 घं 40 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
5.6/10
4.4 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
स्किड रो में अपने कुत्ते के मारे जाने के बाद, जेक रोसेर इस सच्चाई को उजागर करने के लिए एक भयावह अंडरवर्ल्ड में उतर जाता है कि कौन जिम्मेदार हो सकता है।स्किड रो में अपने कुत्ते के मारे जाने के बाद, जेक रोसेर इस सच्चाई को उजागर करने के लिए एक भयावह अंडरवर्ल्ड में उतर जाता है कि कौन जिम्मेदार हो सकता है।स्किड रो में अपने कुत्ते के मारे जाने के बाद, जेक रोसेर इस सच्चाई को उजागर करने के लिए एक भयावह अंडरवर्ल्ड में उतर जाता है कि कौन जिम्मेदार हो सकता है।
Luis Chávez
- Aojo
- (as Luis Chavez)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Ignore the bad reviews. This is a very good movie with good acting. Aaron Eckhart plays the role perfectly. It shows the horrible conditions in Los Angeles and the vast homeless and drug use.
This is definitely one of the best K-9 / military dog movies out there. It shows how dangerous their job is and how good they are at it, especially with the fetanayl crisis that China is importing into the USA now.
This is just a straight-forward movie, without all of the nonsense hollywood is trying to feed down our throats nowadays. There have been few movies this year better than this one. I highly recommend.
This is definitely one of the best K-9 / military dog movies out there. It shows how dangerous their job is and how good they are at it, especially with the fetanayl crisis that China is importing into the USA now.
This is just a straight-forward movie, without all of the nonsense hollywood is trying to feed down our throats nowadays. There have been few movies this year better than this one. I highly recommend.
I must say that I absolutely loved this movie.
It was very heartbreaking and as a canine lover, just shows the true love between a dog and their human.
I love the interactions between the dog and owner and how it just shows that there are no bad animals, just bad owners.
I think it sends a very good message to the public. And should be embraced and shared. My dog watched it with me and she got very sad.
Don't know why some bad reviews.
An absolute wonderful heartfelt caring movie. I cannot fault it at all.
I will encourage anyone who loves animals to take the time and watch this gem. You will never be the same.
It was very heartbreaking and as a canine lover, just shows the true love between a dog and their human.
I love the interactions between the dog and owner and how it just shows that there are no bad animals, just bad owners.
I think it sends a very good message to the public. And should be embraced and shared. My dog watched it with me and she got very sad.
Don't know why some bad reviews.
An absolute wonderful heartfelt caring movie. I cannot fault it at all.
I will encourage anyone who loves animals to take the time and watch this gem. You will never be the same.
The film story is pretty good apart from a pretty odd and under-sketched villain, but what is distracting is the poor quality of the dialogue.
It's a combination of badly recorded dialogue, likely with a lack of options, and amateur use of dialogue cleanup software.
In this case, ADR would have been better to replace the bad parts.
ADR is replacing on set dialogue with new dialogue recorded later in a studio or custom spaces to replicate sets after the film has been shot. If ADR isn't done well, it sounds terrible. The actor has to be good at it, and importantly, the dialogue sound engineer needs to know how to deal with it to make it sound like it was recorded in the environment we see on film.
For a feature, it's a time consuming process and you have to pay the actors more, so perhaps they didn't have the money for it on this film?
Sometimes directors don't like ADR, which is common. In this instance, hire a better sound recordist!
To explain the 'lack of options' term above, there are usually at least 2 microphones used to record actors lines. One is the boom which is often suspended over the actors heads, the other is the Lav which is hidden on the actors body as close to the mouth as possible.
Sometimes sound recordists stuff up Lav mic placement and all you get is scrapes and bumps from the clothes ribbing on the mic and the Lav recording becomes mostly unusable. You are then left with only the boom mic recording.
In noisy environments, boom mics can pick up as much background sound as dialogue, which is a pain and hard to edit. Here, digital audio cleanup software comes into play, and gets used to remove the background noise. If digital cleanup is done badly, you get the kind of dialogue quality which is present within too many shots in this film.
It's a combination of badly recorded dialogue, likely with a lack of options, and amateur use of dialogue cleanup software.
In this case, ADR would have been better to replace the bad parts.
ADR is replacing on set dialogue with new dialogue recorded later in a studio or custom spaces to replicate sets after the film has been shot. If ADR isn't done well, it sounds terrible. The actor has to be good at it, and importantly, the dialogue sound engineer needs to know how to deal with it to make it sound like it was recorded in the environment we see on film.
For a feature, it's a time consuming process and you have to pay the actors more, so perhaps they didn't have the money for it on this film?
Sometimes directors don't like ADR, which is common. In this instance, hire a better sound recordist!
To explain the 'lack of options' term above, there are usually at least 2 microphones used to record actors lines. One is the boom which is often suspended over the actors heads, the other is the Lav which is hidden on the actors body as close to the mouth as possible.
Sometimes sound recordists stuff up Lav mic placement and all you get is scrapes and bumps from the clothes ribbing on the mic and the Lav recording becomes mostly unusable. You are then left with only the boom mic recording.
In noisy environments, boom mics can pick up as much background sound as dialogue, which is a pain and hard to edit. Here, digital audio cleanup software comes into play, and gets used to remove the background noise. If digital cleanup is done badly, you get the kind of dialogue quality which is present within too many shots in this film.
I do have a soft spot for these type of movies... Channing Tatum's "Dog" was surprisingly good, I thought "A Dog's Purpose" was good also. I mean, Turner and Hooch set the bar (or should I say "stick"), it's a classic. I think the less said about K-9 the better. It seems an element of comedy helps these movies build the relationship between man and his would-be best friend. Here though, it's out and out drama with not much in the way of levity to break up the doom and gloom.
I think this started out well but the point where it really needed to start drawing you in to whatever the endgame was, it didn't. Aaron Eckhart did a decent job but I think was let down by the watered-down, John Wick-esque, murky underworld that he was tasked with infiltrating and ultimately toppling. A real lack of a crescendo with the final confrontation being somewhat absent of any real, ahem, 'bite'.
I think this started out well but the point where it really needed to start drawing you in to whatever the endgame was, it didn't. Aaron Eckhart did a decent job but I think was let down by the watered-down, John Wick-esque, murky underworld that he was tasked with infiltrating and ultimately toppling. A real lack of a crescendo with the final confrontation being somewhat absent of any real, ahem, 'bite'.
I have never reviewed a film before, but felt compelled to do so after giving this a watch.
I saw the previews and was excited to sit down and watch...unfortunately, the best part of the movie was the trailer. Eckhart did his best with what he had to work with, but it there were so many forced scenes it was distracting. Beyond that, while the story is pretty linear, scene to scene seems to leave out a lot of information in regards to character development and development of friendships when seemingly there was none.
This is definitely a watch it once film. In the hands of a capable director and producer this could have been excellent.
I saw the previews and was excited to sit down and watch...unfortunately, the best part of the movie was the trailer. Eckhart did his best with what he had to work with, but it there were so many forced scenes it was distracting. Beyond that, while the story is pretty linear, scene to scene seems to leave out a lot of information in regards to character development and development of friendships when seemingly there was none.
This is definitely a watch it once film. In the hands of a capable director and producer this could have been excellent.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe LAPD patrol unit designation "1 Adam 12" can be heard several times over Jake Rosser's (Aaron Echart) police's radio. This is a direct homage to the very popular 1960s television program: 'Adam 12' which was created by the same folks who did Dragnet
- गूफ़Jake comes upon a man in the industrial building, who is heating transdermal patches of fentanyl to extract the drug. He's wearing a surgical mask and a face shield. That might protect him from a drop of the drug getting on his face, but if there were fumes from the process, a surgical mask would be no protection at all.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Muzzle?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Ajuste de cuentas
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- लॉस एंजेल्स काउंटी, कैलिफोर्निया, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका(Establishing driving and still shots)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $7,807
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $5,047
- 1 अक्टू॰ 2023
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $24,353
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 40 मि(100 min)
- रंग
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें