[go: up one dir, main page]

    कैलेंडर रिलीज़ करेंटॉप 250 फ़िल्मेंसबसे लोकप्रिय फ़िल्मेंज़ोनर के आधार पर फ़िल्में ब्राउज़ करेंटॉप बॉक्स ऑफ़िसशोटाइम और टिकटफ़िल्मी समाचारइंडिया मूवी स्पॉटलाइट
    TV और स्ट्रीमिंग पर क्या हैटॉप 250 टीवी शोसबसे लोकप्रिय TV शोशैली के अनुसार टीवी शो ब्राउज़ करेंTV की खबरें
    देखने के लिए क्या हैसबसे नए ट्रेलरIMDb ओरिजिनलIMDb की पसंदIMDb स्पॉटलाइटफैमिली एंटरटेनमेंट गाइडIMDb पॉडकास्ट
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter पुरस्कारअवार्ड्स सेंट्रलफ़ेस्टिवल सेंट्रलसभी इवेंट
    जिनका जन्म आज के दिन हुआ सबसे लोकप्रिय सेलिब्रिटीसेलिब्रिटी से जुड़ी खबरें
    मदद केंद्रयोगदानकर्ता क्षेत्रपॉल
उद्योग के पेशेवरों के लिए
  • भाषा
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
वॉचलिस्ट
साइन इन करें
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
ऐप का इस्तेमाल करें
  • कास्ट और क्रू
  • उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं
  • ट्रिविया
  • अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल
IMDbPro

I Am

  • 2010
  • Not Rated
  • 1 घं 18 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
7.5/10
4 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
I Am (2010)
Director Tom Shadyac speaks with intellectual and spiritual leaders about what's wrong with our world and how we can improve both it and the way we live in it.
trailer प्ले करें2:30
2 वीडियो
1 फ़ोटो
आस्था और अध्यात्म वृत्तचित्रडॉक्यूमेंट्री

अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंDirector Tom Shadyac speaks with intellectual and spiritual leaders about what's wrong with our world and how we can improve both it and the way we live in it.Director Tom Shadyac speaks with intellectual and spiritual leaders about what's wrong with our world and how we can improve both it and the way we live in it.Director Tom Shadyac speaks with intellectual and spiritual leaders about what's wrong with our world and how we can improve both it and the way we live in it.

  • निर्देशक
    • Tom Shadyac
  • स्टार
    • Tom Shadyac
    • Desmond Tutu
    • Noam Chomsky
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • IMDb रेटिंग
    7.5/10
    4 हज़ार
    आपकी रेटिंग
    • निर्देशक
      • Tom Shadyac
    • स्टार
      • Tom Shadyac
      • Desmond Tutu
      • Noam Chomsky
    • 43यूज़र समीक्षाएं
    • 28आलोचक समीक्षाएं
    • 38मेटास्कोर
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
    • पुरस्कार
      • कुल 2 जीत

    वीडियो2

    I Am
    Trailer 2:30
    I Am
    Clip from "I Am"
    Clip 1:17
    Clip from "I Am"
    Clip from "I Am"
    Clip 1:17
    Clip from "I Am"

    फ़ोटो

    टॉप कलाकार51

    बदलाव करें
    Tom Shadyac
    Tom Shadyac
    • Self
    • (बिना क्रेडिट के)
    Desmond Tutu
    Desmond Tutu
    • Self
    Noam Chomsky
    Noam Chomsky
    • Self
    Ray Anderson
    • Self
    Marc Ian Barasch
    Marc Ian Barasch
    • Self
    Coleman Barks
    • Self
    John Francis
    • Self
    Thom Hartmann
    Thom Hartmann
    • Self
    Chris Jordan
    Chris Jordan
    • Self
    Dacher Keltner
    Dacher Keltner
    • Self
    Rollin McCraty
    • Self
    Lynne McTaggart
    • Self
    Daniel Quinn
    • Self
    Dean Radin
    Dean Radin
    • Self
    Elisabet Sahtouris
    • Self
    Marilyn Schlitz
    • Self
    Richard Shadyac
    • Self
    David Suzuki
    David Suzuki
    • Self
    • निर्देशक
      • Tom Shadyac
    • सभी कास्ट और क्रू
    • IMDbPro में प्रोडक्शन, बॉक्स ऑफिस और बहुत कुछ

    उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं43

    7.53.9K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं

    6gavin6942

    Interesting But Rather General

    Director Tom Shadyac speaks with intellectual and spiritual leaders about what is wrong with our world and how we can improve both this world and the way we live in it.

    I appreciate that Shadyac decided to look beyond the world of comedy and try to find a deeper truth in the world. He is an intelligent man and it is good to be able to see this side of him, because "Ace Ventura" does not necessarily suggest a man craving wisdom.

    I also like some of the folks he sought out. There is clearly a liberal bias with Chomsky, Hartman and Zinn being the models, but it was still good to hear from these thinkers. What would the right-wing think tank members say on what is wrong with the world?

    In the end, though, I give it a moderate rating because it never really gets in any depth. The question is vague, and without looking for specific answers, you cannot get the best advice. We all know the world is better if we love one another and pass on a smile, but what is the fundamental problem?
    9curtis-lori

    Be the change

    This is a complete change of pace from the man who brought us Ace Ventura and Liar, Liar. Here Tom looks at the deeper questions of what is wrong with our world and what can we do to change it. Unfortunately, that makes it sound like homework and it is anything but. Tom uses his skill as a filmmaker and his humor to bring us on a journey of enlightenment with him. He has thoughtful conversations with many of the worlds best thinkers and puts the question "what's wrong with our world" to them. Are aggression and competition really the natural order? Is there a better way? This movie asks the questions and gives some possible answers in an entertaining and non-preachy way. The world is what we make of it, and our experience of life is ours to control.

    See this movie!!
    ajpoltz

    Good moral premise falls flat & insulting

    I like the moral premise and idea that all life is connected and happiness is not directly related to money once basic needs are met, but when the filmmaker resorts to pseudoscience trickery he alienates me . Somethings can't or don't need to be proved.The filmmaker shows yogurt with meter probes "reading" his feelings.The next one that got me was the"random number generators that all stopped when there was a major catastrophe. What they are used for anyway? Why they stopped did not impress me.What does a computer care about a tsunami? Is it alive? If you want to prove something with science you have to show more data. So if you want a show that starts with a nice warm cooperative premise and ends with trickery this is a good "bait and switch" for you.

    PS:Happiness is living in a Malibu beach mobile home with 10 million in the bank and a career in Hollywood film directing.Does that compare to the the average struggling person in a mobile home park with no other options? Now I must stop myself.
    7bradfregger

    A philosophical/political personal journey of discovery

    Right up front, I'm a political/social conservative who is okay with marijuana and gay marriage. This may have prejudiced this review a bit.

    First, this is a beautiful movie of self-discovery. And, I do mean self- discovery. There really wasn't a single concept discussed that hasn't been discussed since I was in high school and I'm 70 years old. Actually, these concepts have probably been discussed for the past 5,000 years or more.

    However, if you want to experience a man living through his moment of "enlightenment," this movie will give you that. Essentially, he discovers that happiness doesn't come from material things, but from being involved in something bigger than himself, something that makes a difference.

    He's very careful to state that you don't need to make a big difference to gain a sense of worth and happiness, even the small, little things make a difference. He supports these concepts with some relatively recent scientific research, that points to the power of matters of the heart and the impact our negative and positive thoughts can have on ourselves as well as others; in fact, the environment around us. As I said earlier, toss out the research and you're left with what philosophers and mystics have been telling us for ages.

    One of the major themes sounded very socialistic (this was the political part) , pretty much: From those who have too much, to those who have too little. This is, of course, a common theme amongst progressives (redistribution of wealth). However, something he hinted at was a bit different. He seemed to say that this had to come from the heart, from a personal commitment to help others, to help the community. I would agree and add, that this means that it can't be instigated by any government, you can't order people to love their neighbor. Nothing good comes from trying to do that.

    The big disappointment for me, was the lack of any discussion concerning what I consider to be the two most important questions that this line of thought must deal with.

    1) What do you do about those who decide to take full advantage of the situation and choose only to take and not to give? In other words, live off of the efforts of others.

    2) What do you do about those who decide to manipulate the system to their own personal advantage, both from the financial and the position of power perspectives?

    This type of society leaves itself wide open to that, without a very strong central government that makes sure that things stay fair. However, usually those in the government are the ones to take advantage, and no real gains are achieved by the vast majority of the population.

    I really wish, someday, someone with these Utopian thoughts would honestly approach the tough questions. ... and yes, this is a movie about Utopia ... but, alas, I'm afraid the tough questions will remain unanswered, utopias will continue to fail and humanity will still be having this dream 5,000 years from now.
    9xtratime90

    Asking a controversial question

    I had the pleasure of seeing this movie last evening at my daughters high school. Tom & his team brought a unique perspective to the kids of our world. The film asks some interesting questions, but does not presume so much as to provide answers to something so unanswerable. Instead, it challenges the viewer to look inside themselves a bit & to consider how they interact with the world around them. To be open minded to a world of possibilities and more importantly; to not take your role in this world nor the size of your act as insignificant.

    To often we adults layered with our cynicism, skepticism & selfishness forget that the world is still brand new to our children. The film reaches out to empower the young & reminds them they have the power to create the world they wish to live in.

    Do yourself and your children a favor, take a moment to see this film when it comes out!

    इस तरह के और

    Heal
    7.0
    Heal
    Awake: The Life of Yogananda
    7.2
    Awake: The Life of Yogananda
    Inner Worlds, Outer Worlds
    8.4
    Inner Worlds, Outer Worlds
    Brian Banks
    7.2
    Brian Banks
    Dr. Sensitive
    The Line Up
    The Line Up
    Becoming Nobody
    7.7
    Becoming Nobody
    Platonically Incorrect
    7.2
    Platonically Incorrect
    What If? The Movie
    8.1
    What If? The Movie
    Samadhi
    8.2
    Samadhi
    ड्रैगनफ्लाय
    6.1
    ड्रैगनफ्लाय
    Frankenstein: The College Years
    4.6
    Frankenstein: The College Years

    संबंधित रुचियां

    Morgan Freeman in The Story of God with Morgan Freeman (2016)
    आस्था और अध्यात्म वृत्तचित्र
    Dziga Vertov in Chelovek s kino-apparatom (1929)
    डॉक्यूमेंट्री

    कहानी

    बदलाव करें

    क्या आपको पता है

    बदलाव करें
    • ट्रिविया
      Tom Shadyac described making the documentary as "freeing", giving himself complete creative control along with his small crew.
    • भाव

      Tom Shadyac: An ocean, a rainforest, the human body, are all co-operatives. The redwood tree doesn't take all the soil and nutrients, just what it needs to grow. A lion doesn't kill every gazelle, just one. We have a term for something in the body when it takes more than its share, we call it: cancer.

    • कनेक्शन
      Features वॉल स्ट्रीट (1987)

    टॉप पसंद

    रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
    साइन इन करें

    अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल17

    • How long is I Am?Alexa द्वारा संचालित

    विवरण

    बदलाव करें
    • रिलीज़ की तारीख़
      • फ़रवरी 2011 (यूनाइटेड स्टेट्स)
    • कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
      • यूनाइटेड स्टेट्स
    • आधिकारिक साइट
      • Shady Acres Entertainment (United States)
    • भाषा
      • अंग्रेज़ी
    • इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
      • Ben
    • उत्पादन कंपनियां
      • Flying Eye Productions
      • Homemade Canvas Productions
      • Shady Acres Entertainment
    • IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें

    बॉक्स ऑफ़िस

    बदलाव करें
    • US और कनाडा में सकल
      • $15,91,034
    • US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
      • $10,092
      • 20 फ़र॰ 2011
    • दुनिया भर में सकल
      • $15,91,034
    IMDbPro पर बॉक्स ऑफ़िस की विस्तार में जानकारी देखें

    तकनीकी विशेषताएं

    बदलाव करें
    • चलने की अवधि
      • 1 घं 18 मि(78 min)
    • रंग
      • Color

    इस पेज में योगदान दें

    किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
    • योगदान करने के बारे में और जानें
    पेज में बदलाव करें

    एक्सप्लोर करने के लिए और भी बहुत कुछ

    हाल ही में देखे गए

    कृपया इस फ़ीचर का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए ब्राउज़र कुकीज़ चालू करें. और जानें.
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    ज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करेंज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करें
    सोशल पर IMDb को फॉलो करें
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    Android और iOS के लिए
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    • सहायता
    • साइट इंडेक्स
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb डेटा लाइसेंस
    • प्रेस रूम
    • विज्ञापन
    • नौकरियाँ
    • उपयोग की शर्तें
    • गोपनीयता नीति
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, एक Amazon कंपनी

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.