रिचर्ड अपनी प्लेब्वॉय जीवन शैली को छोड़ देता है जब उसकी प्रेमिका केट गर्भवती हो जाती है. चीजें तब बदल जाती हैं जब केट की बहन ओलिविया उनके जीवन में प्रवेश करती है.रिचर्ड अपनी प्लेब्वॉय जीवन शैली को छोड़ देता है जब उसकी प्रेमिका केट गर्भवती हो जाती है. चीजें तब बदल जाती हैं जब केट की बहन ओलिविया उनके जीवन में प्रवेश करती है.रिचर्ड अपनी प्लेब्वॉय जीवन शैली को छोड़ देता है जब उसकी प्रेमिका केट गर्भवती हो जाती है. चीजें तब बदल जाती हैं जब केट की बहन ओलिविया उनके जीवन में प्रवेश करती है.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I saw it said elsewhere, mockingly, what a great idea it is for a rom-com about a 60 year old professor and a 20 year old co-ed. Clearly they missed the point, since the movie itself shows the complications in this, and the point is NOT the romantic entanglement between the two, but instead about chasing dreams and growing up. It's about the thin line between them.
Pierce Brosnan's character is shown as being extremely successful...when he's in his world. He chooses to step out of his world, and in this new world he enters, one of a seeming fantasy, he looses his potency. It's psychological, as well as borrowing from classic fairy-tale themes. And it's not super deep, but it's not surface level either. It gives a viewer enough to think about, without being an exhausting exercise.
To further underscore this, in his world, the beautiful female is doting and filled with admiration. Once he leaves his world and enters hers, she becomes a bit of a power mad shrew. But he's faced with other factors and some are sympathetic issues, others are off-putting. He's a great dad, and was even a loyal husband, and this makes him sympathetic, but he's never had to exist in a place that didn't cater to him, and some of his ways of dealing with life are childish and embarrassing.
The only real problem I saw with this movie, and it was a major one, was that the person who cheated never had to apologize, or even act remorseful. I expected there to be SOME contrition at some point, but it was never addressed. This would have been bad enough had it just been left to the audience to hold the impression that they were a selfish turd, but as the movie drives towards it's conclusion, the other characters begin apologizing to the cheater for things that weren't a tenth as bad as the infidelity that had taken place. This really stood out and kept me from being totally taken in by the ending resolutions of the movie, but it didn't keep it from being worth watching; just really frustrated with how often movies gloss over major issues as if the audience is too dumb to catch on. In fact, I'd almost wonder if there were some scenes on the cutting room floor that tackled the whole angle but they felt would take too long to cover.
This movie is NOT a rom-com. It is a light-hearted romantic drama that assesses life decisions and directions that probably aren't relatable to anyone still in their younger years. It's not super-deep, but it has some allegory and symbolism if you know how see it.
The cinematography is excellent, with picture-postcard imagery of both London and LA, yet there is no saccharine to be found anywhere in the screenplay, which makes for an eye-candy feast that nourishes rather than nauseates.
Essentially a very well-written, grown-up, romantic film with beautiful scenery, attractive actors, solid dialogue, and a feel-good ending that is only a teeny bit contrived, but not enough to annoy.
This would have scored higher with me if not for the unfortunate casting of Malcolm McDowell, who I personally dislike intensely. His overacting and unsubtle characterisation was, as usual for him, only skin deep, and strained my suspension of disbelief to the point of discomfort.
I never get a sense from McDowell that he ever takes his characters any deeper than a two-dimensional caricature, which is what Brosnan was doing in the early days of his career. But unlike the older veteran, Brosnan has noticeably evolved and developed in his craft, and as he gets older and more grizzled, he taps ever more interesting depths.
Overall, though, this was a fab movie, and one that I'd happily watch again.
"How to Make Love Like an Englishman" has a comedic title, but it is not comedic at all. The three main characters are not only unsympathetic, but actually obnoxious. No one remains faithful to their partners, everyone is foul mouthed. People act irresponsibly at just about every occasion, such as ruining the alcoholic anonymous meeting, or playing with the sister when the green card appointment is in a few days. If Richard really wants to stay in USA, he should at least act a bit more responsibly. Many things in the film don't make sense either, such as Kate staying at the house next door to let her sister take care of the son.
Avoid this film. It's not funny at all, actually it's infuriating to watch.
A fairly predictable ending but didn't bother my interest in wanting to keep finding out what happens.
Give it a chance, you just might be glad you did.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाMalcolm McDowell plays Pierce Brosnan's father, even though McDowell is only ten years older than Brosnan.
- गूफ़Whenever Richard has a phone call he holds his cellphone (HTC One) upside down.
- भाव
Gordon: Good God, man. You've fallen for that little slice of American pie.
Richard: Dad...
Gordon: Now you listen to me. This might be the most important bit of advice that I ever give you. American women may be fun and Victoria Secret when you first met them, but as soon as they get their claws into you, they stop fucking and start eating, and the only ass you gonna get is a fat one.
- कनेक्शनReferences Remington Steele (1982)
- साउंडट्रैकWant You Today
Written by Mark Hart (as Mark G Hart) and Steve Dudas (as Stephen Emil Dudas)
Courtesy of: Extreme Production Music
टॉप पसंद
- How long is Some Kind of Beautiful?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- How to Make Love Like an Englishman
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $24,46,097
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 39 मि(99 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1