Return to Dust

The government of China killed this movie in September 2022. It removed Return to Dust from all streaming platforms, deleted comments on the Weibo social media platform, and outlawed a hashtag for the movie. Possible reasons:

* The protagonist is pretty much compelled to give his blood of a rare type in order to save a local exploiting businessman. The protagonist does not resist, but his wife tells him don't do it.

* The protagonist couple are hounded out of one home after another so that housing developers can make money on land cleared by demolishing the home.

* In a supposedly socialist country, nearly all relatives and villagers treat the protagonist - a man content to be a farmer - and his wife - a woman with medical problems leaving her unable to have a child - with contempt. This is socialist morality and culture? However, we foreign viewers do not know whether this depiction is accurate for rural China as a whole.

In short, Return to Dust shows how much capitalist scramble for riches there is in China today, despite the mouthings of the "Communist" Party of China. The protagonist couple are collateral damage as far as the government is concerned.

Return to Dust is a humanist movie. Its strength is that it puts the fate of the oppressed couple in the viewer's heart. In part this happens when the movie immerses you in the rhythm of their farm labor. The tools are primitive, the toil is backbreaking, and the cycle of seasons is immortal.

The weakness is that the only social change depicted is an onslaught of capitalist exploitation. In reality, the peasants backed the Communist Party when it fought for liberation from landlord exploitation and foreign, especially Japanese, oppression. The peasants heartily backed Communist initiatives to improve their agriculture by cooperative, egalitarian, modernizing methods from the early 1950s to the mid-1970s. If you keep this real history in mind while you watch Return to Dust, it deepens the tragedy.

A couple are matched together for their families' convenience - abused and sickly woman, and put upon, hard-working man. Together they find a measure of happiness and belonging that was missing in their lives.

The movie is beautifully shot, with picturesque landscapes and the images of the shifting seasons. It is a slow film - really a slice of life. The actors played their characters very well.

Beyond the story, the movie left me with a sense of the difficulties of life in rural areas.

Express various details and rural life scenes with the most tactile audio-visual, the slowest and slowest rhythm without driving force, and the gentle lens, depict the rustic rural characters, build the most stable and peaceful picture of rural life, and write the happy and beautiful love story of two people who met each other under the traditional "power" of the Chinese relative without any sex that only Chinese directors can do it. But in the end, they could not escape the heartbreaking elegy.

It can be used as the color scheduling of allusion psychology, but it is not in place. It is very realistic and too gentle. The artistic atmosphere is strong, but in the fast-paced society, it is too arrogant.

This is the most artistic art film in my heart, and it is also the epitome and portrayal of China's rural society today.

It is the farmers that give free blood to the city time and again. How ironic!

What retreats is the dust of love, and what returns is the dust and smoke of the city.

--2022.07.17.

Immensely ethereal scenes paired with a gut wrenching story. The story unravels like a cloth covering the true nature of a persons intentions slowly, but with an impact so strong, making you doubt, and question with great dissapointment the nature of the human behaviour. And in all of the chaos of greed two beacons shine throughout the movie...the two protagonists, the outcasts of the rotten society they've been brought up in...highlight the outmost beauty in human relationship. Youre always followed and reminded of the courage and the absoute humanitarian spirit of the couple and it makes you complete...Complete, for you need it if you want to make it to the ending.

By far the most humanitarian movie ive seen in a while.

A pushover obsessed with working the land, an invalid woman who has only known abuse all her life and a poor donkey come together in a harsh environment where big landowners farm out land in exchange for a year's worth of crops that they buy for next to nothing. Everybody takes advantage or everybody, even the poor despise those poorer or the meek who do not fight back.

What land is this that can grow such rich crops next to sand dunes?

It's a precious insight into how some people still live today. And how sometimes, maybe all too often, family does not raise you up, but drags you down and takes advantage of your kindness.

It's a slow movie that shows the sad reality of living in these remote communities in remote areas, underdeveloped, undereducated, malnourished, effectively abused and manipulated. That initiative to compensate for demolishing old houses in order to make villages more appealing sounds preposterous. It does not paint a pretty picture of contemporary rural China. Not surprisingly, it got pulled from circulation despite winning a bunch of national and international awards.

I love how he cares for her and how they become close. Except for that one time. But it was so obvious she was becoming thinner and thinner and more hunched over. His obsession with work reminds me of a lot of people in my grandma's generation. Working themselves to the ground. Return to dust.