Molke Soleiman

Yes the Visual effects -which the Chinese did by the way -were not great,the pace of movie is not acceptable and it has many flaws and is far from great by cinematography measures But...and yes it is a very big But,It tells the TRUTH which seems to be omitted in the Great movies (Then again by cinematography measures)of today,the time when God is never mentioned (if not in blasphemy)& his prophets are made known as merely KINGS & SEERS. Some of us just think of demons as subjects of tales & myths & aren't even aware of their huge role now and even more in the future as our enemies,the sworn enemies of humans. Watch this movie to know who Solomon the prophet was & What role did he have, and will have in the world of Today and in the future.

In The Name Of God

when first I went to the theater to watch this movie I expected A well Written script with poor production. However I was proved wrong. Of course the Director has done a great job making this movie since all Iranian movies has turned into poor romance comedies which are not by the way funny at all.

But this was a great experience for me. I hope the director makes the sequels better than this one. The music too wasn't good... at least it wasn't what I expected.

It's a good movie. It sure is better than movies like Percy Jackson... But not as good as a first rate movie like The Lord Of The Rings.

The Kingdom of Solomon is simulation and imitation of some Hollywood movies . You can't see anything interesting in this movie , and it's like a reminder of some movies and TV series . If you watche this movie you can see the old zombies of 80's and you can see the Lost TV series smoke thing or you can see the 80's spaceships in the case of a ship with an average visual effect for all effects .

The other issue is this that the story is not completely defined , the characters are not completely introduced to viewer ;for example even you will recognize the Solomon's wife when she is going to die ... and so on .

The viewers in cinema laughed to drama and visual effects that was in this movie , the film is full of horse riding that makes the viewer tired , and , and , and , and ...

So at last I recommend to you to not to watch this movie . It's wasting time , It has nothing , Not story , not any interesting visual effects and in fact it's a repetitive movie with a lower level that you ever seen before . The 5 million dollars wasted for nothing .

Thank you. Best Regards.

First - Amin does a brilliant acting job at Sulaiman, not only as a strong and powerful king when he needs to be, but as a grounded and humble prophet too! Also - The film crew did a brilliant job of showing how the son of the Prophet Dawud would rule, it gives you a glimpse of Sulaiman would have actually ruled in his time. Education- The film does a brilliant job in giving us an insight into what Sulaiman did and how as it is quite hard to research into this particular character compared to others such as Jesus (PBUH) or Muhammad (PBUH). Film - The film does a brilliant job in entertainment, it has neither too much or too little action and neither too much or too little dragging bits. (and no cheesy scenes! :) ) I HIGHLY recommend you watch this and the 2 following films that, INSHALLAH!, will come out.

a Muslim story. and an universal message. Antisemitic references. and good intentions. visual effects who reminds many Asian films. and an impressive effort of entire artistic team. short, a film who could be defined in many ways. waste of time, artificial, ambitious, childish, great or impressive. but who has the virtue to present a story who lives in the faith of Muslims, Jews and Christians. the high price of piece. the challenge of battle against personal demons. the image of wise leader, strong and humble who represents the ideal of every society. Shahriar Bahrani does a decent work and this is the only important fact. it is important not only for the great effort to make the film but for ambition to give a special story. because Molke Soleiman is a testimony of faith. not a story because it seems be a sketch. but as first part of a series, the hope of viewer remains at optimistic level. not copy of Hollywood blockbuster for the simple detail than the purpose is profound different. not as part of chain of the Iranian cinematography masterpieces because the acting, script, image and dialogues are far by it. for an European, Orthodox Christian, like me, it is a definition of Islam in middle of too many controversies. it is the best manner to send a message about essence of faith. like a spiritual wake up.sure, the source is The Quran but this fact has not a challenge for a Christian public. or, maybe, for the Jew public. because the message is the only significant in the case of this poor film. not coherent, too poetic, not real convincing. but useful. and that is the basic motif to see it.