Repeaters
- 2010
- 1 घं 29 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
5.7/10
7.2 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंThree twenty-somethings find themselves in an impossible time loop, where each day they awaken to the same terrifying day as the preceding one.Three twenty-somethings find themselves in an impossible time loop, where each day they awaken to the same terrifying day as the preceding one.Three twenty-somethings find themselves in an impossible time loop, where each day they awaken to the same terrifying day as the preceding one.
- पुरस्कार
- 1 जीत और कुल 9 नामांकन
Ben Immanuel
- Bob Simpson
- (as Benjamin Ratner)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Excellent cast decent story kept me watching till the very good ending. Not an oscar contender but worth the watch decent cast decent cinematography and I was never bored. It's a basic concept but works starts a little slow but kicks in after the premise is set.
This isn't for everyone, but I do think they accomplished what they were attempting and the acting is mostly good, especially the leads.
It is like Groundhog Day, but way darker and less fun. The major twist is there are three people stuck, and since they are scum bags in rehab, they do all sorts of questionable things on their repeated day.
What really makes it interesting is when they start turning on each other... and remembering it the next day.
Not the best ever. The tone kind of reminds me of The River's Edge and Boys Club.
But ultimately it is surprisingly touching and you feel sad for the person you don't expect to.
It is like Groundhog Day, but way darker and less fun. The major twist is there are three people stuck, and since they are scum bags in rehab, they do all sorts of questionable things on their repeated day.
What really makes it interesting is when they start turning on each other... and remembering it the next day.
Not the best ever. The tone kind of reminds me of The River's Edge and Boys Club.
But ultimately it is surprisingly touching and you feel sad for the person you don't expect to.
Where do I even start with this trash. Dear Arne Olson, Stop it. Just stop it. I can't begin to understand how a sane person could sit down to create a movie and think, "I have an idea. How about we make Groundhogs day. But this time it will be about a few drug abusing lunatics." The acting was amateur at best. I can't altogether blame the actors as the dialogue of the script likely resembled a high school play. The character's were very difficult to identify with in any way. What bother's me the most is that there are two people on earth, the writer, and the director who actually think that this is a real mind twisting, deep, original work of cinema. I wouldn't recommend this movie to anyone outside of an animal in a coma.
Any movie set in the country where trees outnumber the cast/crew and plausible town population is well on its way to drawing me in. The scene sets the mood for any film and it was chosen wisely for this Canadian country thriller. The filmmakers gave a taste of the natural surroundings of the location to give some of its own say in the plot which is a big win. It had a bit of feel from Rambo/First Blood where you get the environment playing a part in the characters with strong sounds from the river and a dirt bike. The dialog came across as unforced and played out creatively into a spire of events that held high entertainment value. Mid level psychological value but more entertaining than trying to draw on conceptual values over its own path and plot. This film kept me watching without a yawn and did a quality job of taking the expected state of affairs to the next level. While admittedly most movies drawn up these days use a bit of the same sleazy concepts, this one I believe nestles down into its own unique little fortified holding and fires upon the viewer with a quality helping of raw.
Three delinquents experience the same day over and over again. So what do they do?
Not much, really. The key is "Carston! Seven thirty." And so we go again. But from this enjoyable concept nothing clever or insightful ensues, and we end up with a midwestern family values story. Just like that other movie, but without Bill Murray's delightful cynicism.
What would it be like to live without consequences for your actions? A bit dull, mostly miserable, do the same. So, not much different from real life, which technically makes this a documentary.
This really needed some perverse behaviour from the characters, however foul according to the taste of the intended audience. Without the perversity it simply failed to explore the concept. The good guys were good, the bad guy was bad. Completely dull.
Pace, direction, editing all excellent, but concept cooked as flat as a pancake. I did like the actress with her slopey nose and woolly hat.
Not much, really. The key is "Carston! Seven thirty." And so we go again. But from this enjoyable concept nothing clever or insightful ensues, and we end up with a midwestern family values story. Just like that other movie, but without Bill Murray's delightful cynicism.
What would it be like to live without consequences for your actions? A bit dull, mostly miserable, do the same. So, not much different from real life, which technically makes this a documentary.
This really needed some perverse behaviour from the characters, however foul according to the taste of the intended audience. Without the perversity it simply failed to explore the concept. The good guys were good, the bad guy was bad. Completely dull.
Pace, direction, editing all excellent, but concept cooked as flat as a pancake. I did like the actress with her slopey nose and woolly hat.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियासभी एंट्री में स्पॉइलर हैं
- गूफ़At about 46 minutes in, Kyle and Mike have an argument that gets physical. Mike slams Kyle into the rear passenger side of Kyle's truck behind the back wheel, which apparently creates a huge bash/dent. You can't miss seeing this huge dent when Mike then pulls away with his Chevelle after the fight is over.
Then in the very next scene, Kyle, with Sonia as passenger, pulls his truck into a parking lot and parks. And even though it's dark, that huge dent is OBVIOUSLY not there.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटPre-credits title card: "Don't wait for the last judgement. It happens every day." - Albert Camus
- साउंडट्रैकKettering
Performed by The Antlers
Written by Peter Silberman
Courtesy of Frenchkiss Records
By arrangment with The Orchard
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Repeaters?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $16,00,000(अनुमानित)
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 29 मि(89 min)
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.78 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें