IMDb रेटिंग
5.2/10
11 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपने पिट्यूटरी ग्रंथि में एक सौम्य ट्यूमर को सफलतापूर्वक हटाने के बाद, एक वयस्क व्यक्ति तीन सप्ताह की अवधि में यौवन के सभी परिवर्तनों और प्रभावों का अनुभव करता है.अपने पिट्यूटरी ग्रंथि में एक सौम्य ट्यूमर को सफलतापूर्वक हटाने के बाद, एक वयस्क व्यक्ति तीन सप्ताह की अवधि में यौवन के सभी परिवर्तनों और प्रभावों का अनुभव करता है.अपने पिट्यूटरी ग्रंथि में एक सौम्य ट्यूमर को सफलतापूर्वक हटाने के बाद, एक वयस्क व्यक्ति तीन सप्ताह की अवधि में यौवन के सभी परिवर्तनों और प्रभावों का अनुभव करता है.
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 2 जीत
Diana Lyubenova
- Marilyn
- (as Diana Lubenova)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
The Late Bloomer made me laugh out loud on more than one occasion. Maybe that's because I'm spectacularly childish being as all the humour was of the awkward sexual kind. I don't care, I loved it! I'm surprised by the negative reviews... Maybe I just have a penchant for pre-pubescent 30 year old's because I actually found myself having a crush on Johnny Simmons which made his angsty teenage strops particularly amusing to me. Loved his parents characters, loved his two sidekicks. Didn't find his love interest particularly appealing. But this is a comedy and to me it totally served it's purpose and kept me entertained and amused throughout.
I came on here before watching The Late Bloomer and came across mostly negative comments but went ahead and thought id watch the film as i thought it has comedy potential. I am glad i watched it as i did laugh a couple of times and thought the actors were very well played. the plot was interesting as its not something ordinary. In my opinion this is a funny, quirky film.
This film is okay for adults but no children please. Not really my cup of tea but some really liked it.
I turned into this because it seemed like a good premise and there were like 500 stars in this thing. I was a bit confused by the start of this movie. We are introduced to Peter Newmans, a therapist. For me though, this part went on wayyyy too long. But it is to establish that Peter has no sexual desires and, due to that, a very successful life as a sex addiction therapist. Eventually at about the half way point Peter is hurt and goes to the ER and during the examination it comes to light that he has a tumor on his pituitary gland and has not "matured" properly. I have a bit of a problem buying that this was never discovered by a doctor before this or brought to the doctor's attention. After removal of his tumor puberty decends on Peter and his perfect asexual life - confusing and upsetting just about everyone. The second half of this movie is played for crass laughs - when it should have been played for heartfelt humor about what would happen to a 30 year old entering puberty. I thought everyone tried and there was good talent, but it was the script and writing.
First off, let me state that I don't like movies like this. The only reason I watched this movie was because I saw Brittany Snow was in it. And honestly, she killed it. I loved her character as Michelle. She was so sweet, and her performance, along with the great J.k. Simmons, really carried this film.
However, the rest of the film left a lot to be desired. The film's premise was interesting enough (And supposedly, the movie is loosely based on the life of Ken Baker. Baker told his son that a third was pure fiction, a third was partially true, and a third was straight out of his life). An adult going through puberty could be funny. But honestly, it felt like they forced all the sexual jokes, which is sad because I thought the start of the film was really sweet. Also, going through puberty doesn't make you a jerk. The main character is a straight jerk. But then again, all the men in this movie are selfish jerks.
I didn't have high hopes for this film going to end, and I left disappointed. But if you have nothing else to do, give it a watch if only for Brittany Snow.
However, the rest of the film left a lot to be desired. The film's premise was interesting enough (And supposedly, the movie is loosely based on the life of Ken Baker. Baker told his son that a third was pure fiction, a third was partially true, and a third was straight out of his life). An adult going through puberty could be funny. But honestly, it felt like they forced all the sexual jokes, which is sad because I thought the start of the film was really sweet. Also, going through puberty doesn't make you a jerk. The main character is a straight jerk. But then again, all the men in this movie are selfish jerks.
I didn't have high hopes for this film going to end, and I left disappointed. But if you have nothing else to do, give it a watch if only for Brittany Snow.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe movie is loosely based of of the life of Ken Baker. Baker told his son that a third was pure fiction, a third was partially true, and a third was straight out of his life.
- गूफ़In the beginning of the movie, when Peter is talking to Michelle in her kitchen, his wine glass switches hands and then completely disappears from his hand.
- भाव
James Newmans: I think the biggest change we go through is discovering the difference between acting like a man and being a man.
- कनेक्शनReferences The Godfather (1972)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is The Late Bloomer?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $35,00,000(अनुमानित)
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 30 मि(90 min)
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें