Balaur
- 2021
- 2 घं 3 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
6.7/10
1.3 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
इकातेरिना, एक हाई स्कूल धर्म शिक्षक और शहर पुजारी की पत्नी, एक अशांत अतीत वाले 16 वर्षीय छात्र इउलियू से जुड़ जाती है. इकातेरिना उसे नियंत्रण में रखने की कोशिश करती है, लेकिन वह इस प्रक्रिया... सभी पढ़ेंइकातेरिना, एक हाई स्कूल धर्म शिक्षक और शहर पुजारी की पत्नी, एक अशांत अतीत वाले 16 वर्षीय छात्र इउलियू से जुड़ जाती है. इकातेरिना उसे नियंत्रण में रखने की कोशिश करती है, लेकिन वह इस प्रक्रिया में खुद की नियंत्रण की भावना खो देती है.इकातेरिना, एक हाई स्कूल धर्म शिक्षक और शहर पुजारी की पत्नी, एक अशांत अतीत वाले 16 वर्षीय छात्र इउलियू से जुड़ जाती है. इकातेरिना उसे नियंत्रण में रखने की कोशिश करती है, लेकिन वह इस प्रक्रिया में खुद की नियंत्रण की भावना खो देती है.
- पुरस्कार
- 3 जीत और कुल 19 नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Tonight I saw Octav Chelaru's debut feature film, which is based on (or rather is inspired by) a real love story with a tragic ending, which happened some years ago, between a priest's wife and a high school student. The story ended with the suicide of the young man.
I won't narrate the movie here, just a few highlights.
The film has all the characteristics of the low-budget Romanian film, which relies a lot on the psychological mindset of the characters, in order to impress the audience! With all the good and the bad that derives from here!
The film has a good flow, it is not preaching anything and it's quite honest, not forcing the viewer towards limited interpretations.
I still don't know what to say about how believable the characters are presented. Maybe because of my familiarity with the setting, maybe because of the exceptionality of the story.
Dialogues are, most often, natural; sometimes slightly touched by hysteria, as in all Romanian films. Or maybe it's just my feeling...
All in all, it is not an anti-clerical film at all! On the contrary! Beyond some awkwardness, the church, the priesthood, the priest's family are approached very respectfully!
It's a film about wounded and unfulfilled eros, maybe also about a confused past of a woman, maybe incapable of happiness, maybe forced to live a life that didn't make her happy!
But more than that, I think it's about the devastating effect that migration and the lack of family love has on children and teenagers!
The conclusion drawn by me, let's call it "moral conclusion", is that man without love is nothing and tends towards self-destruction. The lack of love places the soul in an entropic desire, which, at best, destroys destinies, and at worst, puts the equal sign between life and death!
I say it's a movie worth seeing!
I won't narrate the movie here, just a few highlights.
The film has all the characteristics of the low-budget Romanian film, which relies a lot on the psychological mindset of the characters, in order to impress the audience! With all the good and the bad that derives from here!
The film has a good flow, it is not preaching anything and it's quite honest, not forcing the viewer towards limited interpretations.
I still don't know what to say about how believable the characters are presented. Maybe because of my familiarity with the setting, maybe because of the exceptionality of the story.
Dialogues are, most often, natural; sometimes slightly touched by hysteria, as in all Romanian films. Or maybe it's just my feeling...
All in all, it is not an anti-clerical film at all! On the contrary! Beyond some awkwardness, the church, the priesthood, the priest's family are approached very respectfully!
It's a film about wounded and unfulfilled eros, maybe also about a confused past of a woman, maybe incapable of happiness, maybe forced to live a life that didn't make her happy!
But more than that, I think it's about the devastating effect that migration and the lack of family love has on children and teenagers!
The conclusion drawn by me, let's call it "moral conclusion", is that man without love is nothing and tends towards self-destruction. The lack of love places the soul in an entropic desire, which, at best, destroys destinies, and at worst, puts the equal sign between life and death!
I say it's a movie worth seeing!
This film exceeded my expectations and the group of filmmakers who did this have a lot of potential!
I didn't think it was mediocre at all, the performance of the main actress was excellent, you could feel that constant tension, especially in the scene when she was looking for her son and was teaching him how to cover her lies. She transforms very unexpectedly into a different person she couldn't know she could be.
The ending was somehow surprising and served exactly what it needed. It made me think and it still does. There are lots of interpretations for the final scene and I recommend everybody to see the film and find the suitable meaning for themselves.
I didn't think it was mediocre at all, the performance of the main actress was excellent, you could feel that constant tension, especially in the scene when she was looking for her son and was teaching him how to cover her lies. She transforms very unexpectedly into a different person she couldn't know she could be.
The ending was somehow surprising and served exactly what it needed. It made me think and it still does. There are lots of interpretations for the final scene and I recommend everybody to see the film and find the suitable meaning for themselves.
The slow pace, deliberate classicism, and thematics of this debut film would easily serve as arguments for shipping it off as "another one of those East European dramas" that have been practically mass-produced in recent years. This would be to overlook the fact that Chelaru's feature film unmasks the patriarchal workings with astonishing maturity, often at the turn of a shot or a dialogue.
Passed under all the major radars, this story about the perilous relationship between a Religion teacher married to an Orthodox priest and one of her underage students certainly does not have the subversive charge of a Radu Jude, but can boast of a beautiful suspense where we can guess the influence of Michael Haneke.
Passed under all the major radars, this story about the perilous relationship between a Religion teacher married to an Orthodox priest and one of her underage students certainly does not have the subversive charge of a Radu Jude, but can boast of a beautiful suspense where we can guess the influence of Michael Haneke.
A truly enjoyable cinema experience. It has humour, tension, rhythm and very, very good performances from all the main cast. Alexandru Papadopol is very convincing as a the dispassionate priest.
A film that makes you think of French cinema. Alexandru Papadopol was well chosen for the role of the priest. His physique and the level of his performance help the character a lot. I never liked this actor and I don't like priests in general, so for me this role is a very pleasant and unexpected surprise. Alexandru Papadopol plays his part well until the end, being very credible. Mãlina Manovici is a sensual, expressive actress who conveys a lot, knowing how to hide a girl full of carnal desires under an angelic face. There would be a lot to say about the subject matter of the film, but that's another topic. In conclusion, a well-made film, along with Neidentificat (2020).
क्या आपको पता है
- गूफ़In Romania the local police have plates with the region (in this case VL), not MAI, which is the national police plates.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is A Higher Law?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- A Higher Law
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- Râmnicu Vâlcea, रोमानिया(location)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $30,133
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 3 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें