IMDb रेटिंग
4.3/10
4.3 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
एक पूर्व-हैकर को उच्च-स्तरीय बैंकिंग संस्थानों में सेंध लगाने के लिए मजबूर किया जाता है, एक अन्य व्यक्ति को युवक को हॉट सीट से निकालने के लिए इमारत में घुसने की कोशिश करनी चाहिए.एक पूर्व-हैकर को उच्च-स्तरीय बैंकिंग संस्थानों में सेंध लगाने के लिए मजबूर किया जाता है, एक अन्य व्यक्ति को युवक को हॉट सीट से निकालने के लिए इमारत में घुसने की कोशिश करनी चाहिए.एक पूर्व-हैकर को उच्च-स्तरीय बैंकिंग संस्थानों में सेंध लगाने के लिए मजबूर किया जाता है, एक अन्य व्यक्ति को युवक को हॉट सीट से निकालने के लिए इमारत में घुसने की कोशिश करनी चाहिए.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I give this film 2 stars for getting enough money or blackmail to compel some name actors into doing this film. I wonder if Britney Spears paid so she could cast her boyfriend, now husband, in this film. As someone else says, he laughingly acts his ass off, showing how much "chops" he has as an actor so he can be the most memorable, useless character of all with just a few minutes screen time. A dull tool.
That about explains this movie about a hacker, which has a story that couldn't even be sold 20 years ago to seniors who know almost nothing about computers and hacking. I couldn't stop laughing when Mel Gibson tries to sell something about a "DOS attack" as if it mmakes much sense in the context of this loser. Kevin Dillon, who has done some decent work, is given the hopeless task of carrying this film along with Gibson, who comes in from time to time to provide the cop shtick and he does what he can to try to sound credible. It works about half the time, the rest he's almost dialed in, brain gain. Shannon Doherty barely shows, barks orders like the police captain she is, perhaps just trying to remain relevant in film while she has unfortunately gone through her own health hell.
In the end, the villain is a laughable, non-stop babbling buffoon. If you're not watching this on a streaming where you can skip parts, you'll be in constant pain as there is little reason to want to stay for the journey since it's completely unconvincing. This is "bad Bruce Willis movie" level bad. Perhaps they needed the money. Owed a favor. I don't know but those must have been some really awful pictures the director and writers must have on the stars in this film.
That about explains this movie about a hacker, which has a story that couldn't even be sold 20 years ago to seniors who know almost nothing about computers and hacking. I couldn't stop laughing when Mel Gibson tries to sell something about a "DOS attack" as if it mmakes much sense in the context of this loser. Kevin Dillon, who has done some decent work, is given the hopeless task of carrying this film along with Gibson, who comes in from time to time to provide the cop shtick and he does what he can to try to sound credible. It works about half the time, the rest he's almost dialed in, brain gain. Shannon Doherty barely shows, barks orders like the police captain she is, perhaps just trying to remain relevant in film while she has unfortunately gone through her own health hell.
In the end, the villain is a laughable, non-stop babbling buffoon. If you're not watching this on a streaming where you can skip parts, you'll be in constant pain as there is little reason to want to stay for the journey since it's completely unconvincing. This is "bad Bruce Willis movie" level bad. Perhaps they needed the money. Owed a favor. I don't know but those must have been some really awful pictures the director and writers must have on the stars in this film.
Why Mel Gibson took part in this film at all is beyond me. The movie has a lot of flaws and is bad. I laughed several times when I shouldn't have, and when I should have, I didn't. That says a lot. It's a shame because the movie could have been much, much better, it has potential considering the plot.
The acting is so bad
The dialogue is terrible
The hacking and computer terms are wrong
Even the story is very shallow
It could be executed way better Total waste of time.
Even the story is very shallow
It could be executed way better Total waste of time.
Even with his resume full of filmmaking experience, director James Cullen Bressack still keeps giving us amateur C grade boring films. Once again he failed to direct his cast properly, especially Doherty. Only Gibson and Dillon (barely) held their own without cast direction. Then Bressack just kept giving us long dragged out and mostly unnecessary scenes. The writing by Leon Langford and Collin Watts was cliched, stale, inept, predictable and boring, especially making the normally comfortable 99 min film feel much longer with the slow pacing and constant computer screen garble. Don't get me started on the plot and technical issues that riddled this mess. You will lose your patience waiting for the ending credits that offer zero reward. It's a very generous 4/10 from me, mostly for the pity that Dillion and Gibson had to endure to get through this one.
I don't think this movie was intended to be a comedy, but it is certainly laughable. Low budget, bad edits, goofy dialog, and the most cheesy one-liners I've heard in a while. I had to keep watching to see how bad it could get.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाWhen Orlando (Kevin Dillon) first goes to work, there is a small poster hanging next to his locker that says, "There's no place like 127.0.0.1". This is a joke among techies, translated to "There's no place like home."
It is a reference to two items: an 18th century poem, "Home Sweet Home" and the more obviously recognizable line from the Wizard of Oz.
127.0.0.1, in layman's terms, means "this computer", or in relation to the joke, "home".
- गूफ़Character Orlando Friar receives an instant message dated Feb 28th when the movie is taking place during the winter holidays.
- भाव
Wallace Reed: [his partner wants to split up] No This Is Always Part Of The Film Where The Partners Split Up To Cover More Ground And One Of Them Ends Up Dying
- कनेक्शनReferenced in Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Qatar World Cup (2022)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Hot Seat?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Hot Seat: En la mira
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $68,798
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 39 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39:1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें