The Lord of the Rings: The War of the Rohirrim

The good thing is: animation is good and buitifully made.

All the rest is awfull. The plot is unbelievebly stupid and predictable at evey turn. It lacks any coherence and depth, grown man behave like five-years-old, the authors do not posses the essential minimum understanding of medieval warfare to make the audience take the battles a bit seriously.

The pratagonist is a Mery Sue to the extreme, she is the smartest, the fastest, the bravest and the strongest, she always have the best solution to any tactical or political problem. Well, actually her ideas are naive and shallow, but all the rest on the set are so incredibly dumb that hers seems to pass.

The movie is a waste if time, it comes nothing near the original and just rides on its name.

The lesson here is that it is dangerous to monkey around with Tolkien. Unless you have something that will enhance the story, without mangling it, you will make a lot of people very angry, and angry people don't put their bums on cinema seats.

It is also not a good idea to make the characters do absurd things every 30 seconds or so. The audience are not going to react well to being faced with ridiculous, or improbable situations all the time. They will grumble to their friends about them, and those friends will decide not to bother seeing it.

I am a big anime fan. I think it's fantastic, and I watch a lot of it. It is NOT a good idea to have a film like this directed by an anime director. Anime has a different perspective to story telling. Another reviewer said that he found it strange that people just stand around when someone is in danger. Quite often that is the way that anime scenes are filmed. One defender, one attacker, or even when there is only one defender, and there are a lot of attackers. One attacker at a time, like they are taking turns.

Héra's costumes were frequently a little wrong for the same reason. The style was out of character with the universe it was in. There were also some ragged areas of the animation, where it looked like something from a decade or two ago.

I won't be watching it a second time.

I am a long time (40+ years) Tolkien fan, and arguably fall into the category of being hard to please. I saw this film on IMAX and I must say that it looks pretty nice, with the scenery being exemplary. The animation style might put some people off, depending on preference, but I think it holds up. In summary, overall production value is up to expectation for me (picture, sound, voice acting etc).

Now, where it falls short is definitely on the script side, and I join the (growing) crowd who has a hard time understanding why they decided to change the storyline from the book instead of just building on it. I get the motive and all, but it is still a mystery why they decided to go in this direction, despite the fact that they know EXACTLY what will happen when it hits the Tolkien fandom.

Filmmakers could easily have done more or less the same story, including the Hera perspective, but without tampering with the source material and they would have gotten through this in a much better shape.

I guess it is a sign of the times. Sadly.

This movie is based on a one-page story (mostly) about Helm Hammerhand from Appendix A of the LoTR book (which is a pretty nice read btw). The book's dialogue and events are actually kept to quite an extent, with only minor alterations in detail. The film does an especially good job capturing the epic character of Helm Hammerhand, as depicted in the books. However Hera, introduced in the movie, is not in the books at all and some of her deeds are actually done in the original work by her cousin, Fréaláf.

What many people like about Tolkien's universe is its pre-industrial, simple world, where this simplicity highlights the theme of human nature/values and the moral order of the universe. In the 'classic' movies there is a lot of wisdom hidden in everyday conversations, like "All we have to do is decide what to do with the time given to us" (LoTR) or "It is the small things, everyday deeds of ordinary folk that keep darkness at bay" (Hobbit), which I would say are timeless truths about our world, and these are lines I think about sometimes even after the movie ends.

However, this movie has nothing to add in this front. It introduces modern issues (feminism), into Tolkien's world in a way that feels both foreign and forced, ultimately undermining both Tolkien's vision and the cause of feminism it seeks to support. It's not as bad as RoP, but still shows. Of course it's not about that women can't do any of the things depicted in the movie, or that the book should be followed exactly. It's just that it's not guided purely by the love of Tolkien's work and legacy, and it really shows.

But besides that, it's not a terrible movie. I would say it's worth a watch.

Story is good. I mean its Tolkien. But animation is so bad. So many problems where they mix 2D and 3D. Textures are horrible. Fake Depth of field, characters floating in the air while walking. Directing mediocre. Voice acting mediocre. Such a shame for such good story. All in all solid 6. If it appeared 20 years ago would be 8 probably. But as Art Director my self I cant over look such rookie mistakes regarding art style, cutting corners by reducing action of a characters and there movement. Comparing to modern Japanese anime this is super bad. As someone who does art, and review art in daily bases this is amberesing for such big budget movie.