IMDb रेटिंग
4.0/10
1.5 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंIn the near future the world has entered a set of constant chaos with a massive immigration crisis birthing a rebellion against the last all encompassing world government.In the near future the world has entered a set of constant chaos with a massive immigration crisis birthing a rebellion against the last all encompassing world government.In the near future the world has entered a set of constant chaos with a massive immigration crisis birthing a rebellion against the last all encompassing world government.
- पुरस्कार
- 2 जीत और कुल 5 नामांकन
Eun-seo Yun
- Ji-Soo Paik
- (वॉइस)
Michael Scott Action
- BC2 US Engineer
- (वॉइस)
- (as Real Michael Scott)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Ok so every game launch is messy especially this one lots of bugs lots of missing features and lots of hit registration issues the main problem though is it seems kinda lifeless even with the new 128 players the some of the maps are too large the larger maps all the players just do there own thing so here you are traveling alone to the nearest objective i believe that later on it will change a lot i mean they even said that there will be a major update soon I personally want more chaos more explosions more life so thats it dont take the bad reviews into consideration because this games gonna change a lot bf4 was like this at launch only one other review said that so yeah thats my review.
Plot
In the near future the world has entered a set of constant chaos with a massive immigration crisis birthing a rebellion against the last all encompassing world government.
Cast
Not familiar.
Verdict
I grew up with first person shooters, but by that I mean Doom, Wolfenstein, Hexen, Rise of the Triad and more. When the multi-player generation kicked in I was rarely impressed, Medal of Honor? No thanks. Call of Duty? Meh. Online CoD bored me whereas Battlefield I got a level of enjoyment from. I could never understand why anybody would choose CoD over Battlefield.
Battlefield had bigger environments, more players in battles, vehicles (Ground, water and air) it was just superior in every way to me.
When Battlefield 2042 came out I remember hearing wall to wall complaints, people hated it so when I went in I assumed the worst. The thing is the complaints were never really specific, they were just claims they didn't like the game but rarely an explanation of why. Yes it had bugs, but what AAA games doesn't shortly after release? The trouble is it's over two years later and there are still bugs present, mostly frustrating graphical ones.
The game itself is solid enough, though a bit all over the place as it's set across multiple time periods and tries to be a bit too grandiose for its own good. WW2 battles? Sure. Modern battles? Sure. Futuristic battles? Sure. It makes loadouts a pain in the butt and I didn't like that it was so all over the place.
Everything else however is fine, the mechanics are solid, the locations are varied, every box is ticked so why the hatred?
It's not the best Battlefield game, but it's a decent enough entry.
Rants
No seriously, why do people choose CoD over Battlefield? I believe it's changed recently but prior the environments were tiny by comparison. You couldn't turn a corner without running into an enemy. No vehicles, fewer players....why!? Battlefield saw you riding a jeep across a sprawling environment, tanks roaring beside you, planes engaged in dogfights above, superior in every conceivable way.
Breakdown
Lots of environments Great logistics Multiple time periods don't work Unforgivable bugs.
In the near future the world has entered a set of constant chaos with a massive immigration crisis birthing a rebellion against the last all encompassing world government.
Cast
Not familiar.
Verdict
I grew up with first person shooters, but by that I mean Doom, Wolfenstein, Hexen, Rise of the Triad and more. When the multi-player generation kicked in I was rarely impressed, Medal of Honor? No thanks. Call of Duty? Meh. Online CoD bored me whereas Battlefield I got a level of enjoyment from. I could never understand why anybody would choose CoD over Battlefield.
Battlefield had bigger environments, more players in battles, vehicles (Ground, water and air) it was just superior in every way to me.
When Battlefield 2042 came out I remember hearing wall to wall complaints, people hated it so when I went in I assumed the worst. The thing is the complaints were never really specific, they were just claims they didn't like the game but rarely an explanation of why. Yes it had bugs, but what AAA games doesn't shortly after release? The trouble is it's over two years later and there are still bugs present, mostly frustrating graphical ones.
The game itself is solid enough, though a bit all over the place as it's set across multiple time periods and tries to be a bit too grandiose for its own good. WW2 battles? Sure. Modern battles? Sure. Futuristic battles? Sure. It makes loadouts a pain in the butt and I didn't like that it was so all over the place.
Everything else however is fine, the mechanics are solid, the locations are varied, every box is ticked so why the hatred?
It's not the best Battlefield game, but it's a decent enough entry.
Rants
No seriously, why do people choose CoD over Battlefield? I believe it's changed recently but prior the environments were tiny by comparison. You couldn't turn a corner without running into an enemy. No vehicles, fewer players....why!? Battlefield saw you riding a jeep across a sprawling environment, tanks roaring beside you, planes engaged in dogfights above, superior in every conceivable way.
Breakdown
Lots of environments Great logistics Multiple time periods don't work Unforgivable bugs.
Bad graphics make everything look plastic. Sound design is bad. Maps are uninteresting. Movement is slow with no way to adjust sensitivity. Feels unfinished. I have no idea how this was approved for release.
Battlefield 2042 has gone through a pretty significant overhaul since its horrid launch. However unlike the Battlefield 4 overhaul, the game was designed so poorly from the ground up that it ends up being mediocre at best.
Cons:
Pros:
TLDR: It's a fun for a few hours and then it's painfully obvious that its not very good.
Cons:
- The gunplay has zero depth(more reminiscent of Call of Duty)
- The maps are the worst in the franchise
- The tone is way to cartoonish
- The specialist is system is horrible
- 128 players just does not work
- The visuals don't match the standard of past Battlefield titles
Pros:
- Maps are in diverse locations
- Some maps look beautiful
- Iwo Jima plays pretty well on breakthrough
- Remastered maps play pretty well
- Portal is cool idea executed poorly
TLDR: It's a fun for a few hours and then it's painfully obvious that its not very good.
Alot of bad choices mad here, including the "no pats" undertones and rubbish class system which doesn't make any sense when you are fighting russian vs usa anyway? ?
the game when it is working is actually a hep[ of fun, when it works, 9 times out of 10 in the first month your lucky not to have to restart at least 4 times an hour on pc.
Probably better to go play hello kitty island adventure.
the game when it is working is actually a hep[ of fun, when it works, 9 times out of 10 in the first month your lucky not to have to restart at least 4 times an hour on pc.
Probably better to go play hello kitty island adventure.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाIt is the Seventeenth installment of the Battlefield series. Continues the first-person shooter that features futuristic weapons and gadgets
- कनेक्शनFeatured in AniMat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: E3 2021 and Why Only Nintendo Matters (2021)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रंग
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें