Quislings siste dager

Quislings siste dager attempts to delve into the psyche of one of Norway's most infamous historical figures, yet it struggles to bring his inner turmoil to life in a truly cinematic way. The film presents a compelling subject-Quisling's fears, loathing, and psychological unraveling in his final days-but fails to fully capitalize on its potential for visual storytelling.

While the script aims for introspection, the execution leans too heavily on dialogue, making it feel more like a staged theater production than an immersive film. The editing lacks dynamism, often slowing the pacing rather than enhancing the tension or emotional weight of the story. Likewise, the cinematography is competent but uninspired, doing little to elevate the film beyond a functional historical reenactment.

The performances, while dedicated, are hampered by the film's restrained approach. Quisling's descent into paranoia and despair should have been an intense and harrowing experience, but the film's stylistic choices mute much of that potential. There are moments where the film hints at something deeper-a fleeting glance, a subtle hesitation-but these are often undercut by the theatrical blocking and over-reliance on exposition.

Perfectly realized film probing the mind of one of the most famous collaborators in WWII. His name is still heard today, as a symbol of unforgiveable treasonous acts. The film shows how the man deceived himself, believing he had done a service for Norway and its people. The younger hospital chaplain, who is charged with eliciting a confession from Quisling goes through self-examination in the process. We also see the wives of these men and the differing reactions they have. Courtroom scenes of the trial are brief, but revealing, even shocking when an Auschwitz survivor testifies. Brilliant performances by Danielsen and Eidsvold who plays Quisling with fervor and ferocity. A great addition to the enormous list of films portraying important figures and events of the war.

An absolute masterpiece from start to finish! The acting was nothing short of brilliant, with each performance delivering a depth and authenticity that truly brought the characters to life. The slower pacing worked beautifully, giving the audience time to fully immerse themselves in the story and appreciate every subtle nuance.

The film provided an insightful and thought-provoking portrayal of Quisling, his wife, and Peder the priest. It struck the perfect balance between personal drama and historical context, offering a unique perspective on this dark chapter of history. The restrained use of CGI was impeccable, enhancing the scenes without ever detracting from the emotional weight of the performances.

The storyline was gripping, full of tension and reflection, leaving you to ponder the moral complexities long after the credits rolled. It didn't rely on heavy-handed depictions of brutality, but rather focused on the psychological and emotional layers, making it all the more impactful.

As with many great Norwegian films, the atmosphere was dark and intimate, and the smaller cast only added to its charm. Each character felt fully realized, contributing to a rich and immersive viewing experience. A truly exceptional film that showcases the best of what Norwegian cinema has to offer.

It probably was about time that Norwegian cinema tackled this elephant in the room and made a biopic on Vidkun Quisling, the man who appointed himself Minister President and collaborated with the Nazis during the German occupation of Norway between 1940 and 1945, and paid the ultimate price for his actions when in October 1945 he became the last person to be executed in Norway. The director is Erik Poppe, who has handled Norwegian national traumas skilfully before, notably with Utøya 22. Juli in 2018, and he manages to portray Quisling with a fairly dignified level of balance, even if his dissection becomes lingering at times. The running time most certainly could have been trimmed a little; there are a few too many meetings behind closed doors. And although there is a disruptive dissonance between Eidsvold's imitative rendition of Quisling's intonation and demeanour on the one side, and Danielsen Lie's overly modern approach and delivery, their final scene together ultimately does evoke some of the intended emotion and bond between their two characters. With beautiful CGI recreations of 1940s Oslo which elevate the overall impression.

Unlike Sweden Norway has a limited film history. Little was heard about Erik Skjoldbjærg after "Insomnia" (1997) and Thea Hvistendahl ("Handling the undead", 2024) still has to prove herself. The only two vested Norwegian directors seem to be Joachim Trier ("Thelma, 2017 and "The worst person in the world", 2021) and Erik Poppe.

"Quisling the final days" is the last film in a trilogy Poppe made about right wing extremist ideology.

"The King's choice" (2016) is about the resistance of King Haakon VII of Norway against the Nazi's in the Second World War. In other words the film is about an historical hero.

"Utoya, 22 july" (2018) is about the terrorist attack on a childrens summer camp in 2011 by Anders Breivik. It is about current right wing extrimism and is told from the point of view of a victim.

"Quisling, the final days" (2024) is again situated in (or more precisely just after) the Second World War. It is about the Prime Minister of Norway who collaborated with the Nazi's until the end of the war. The main character of the story this time is a villain. In most Second World War movies the German's are the ultimate villians, but "Quisling, the final days" is about a collaborator for a change.

The addition "final days" in the title of the movie indicates that this is not really a biopic. The film starts at the end of the Second World War with the arrest of Quisling. The film essentialy is about Quisling meditating about his deeds during his trial. He does so together with the priest Peder Olsen, who is assigned to him for the salavation of his soul (not his body!).

In effect Peder Olsen is just as much a main character as Quisling is. The essence of the film is their relationship and their communication, mostly about religion. With this Poppe firmly stands in the tradition of Ingmar Bergman. The film reminded me very much of "Winter light" (1963, Ingmar Bergman). In "Winter light" a priest doesn't manage to alleviate the fears and doubts of his parishioner. In "Quisling, the final days" on the other hand the priest doesn't manage to sow any doubts in the character of Quisling until almost the very (strong and surprising) end.

Quisling stubbornly keeps beleiving that he did nothing wrong and that he saved Norway from Bolshevik Russia. Years ago Quisling had witnessed the famine Stalin created willfully in Ukraine. The rule of thumb "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" (wrong as always) drove him in the corner of the Nazi ideology.

Coincidentally, "Quisling, the final days" was released in more or less the same period as "Riefenstahl" (2024, Andres Veiel). Whereas Leni Riefenstahl downplayed her relationship with the Nazi's after the Second World War, Quisling almost seems proud of it.

Cinema is visual storytelling. In "Quisling, the final days" Poppe uses a color palette in which green and red are very dominant colors. It creates an uncanny mood. In "Beanpole" (2019, Kantemir Balagov) the same colors were used to create the same effect.