फ़र्डिनेंड मैगलन द्वारा एकत्र किया गया एक खज़ाना, जिसे पांच सौ साल पहले मोंटकाडा हाउस द्वारा खो दिया गया था, उसे पुनर्प्राप्त करने के लिए अनुभवी खजाना शिकारी, विक्टर सुली सुलिवन, स्ट्रीट स्म... सभी पढ़ेंफ़र्डिनेंड मैगलन द्वारा एकत्र किया गया एक खज़ाना, जिसे पांच सौ साल पहले मोंटकाडा हाउस द्वारा खो दिया गया था, उसे पुनर्प्राप्त करने के लिए अनुभवी खजाना शिकारी, विक्टर सुली सुलिवन, स्ट्रीट स्मार्ट नेथन ड्रेक को नियुक्त करता है.फ़र्डिनेंड मैगलन द्वारा एकत्र किया गया एक खज़ाना, जिसे पांच सौ साल पहले मोंटकाडा हाउस द्वारा खो दिया गया था, उसे पुनर्प्राप्त करने के लिए अनुभवी खजाना शिकारी, विक्टर सुली सुलिवन, स्ट्रीट स्मार्ट नेथन ड्रेक को नियुक्त करता है.
- पुरस्कार
- 3 कुल नामांकन
सारांश
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
The story begins with young Nathan Drake, a bartender who had one day planned on finding treasure with his brother Sam. After the disappearance of his brother, he never felt the need to get back into the game. When Victor Sullivan (Sully) appears after his shift one night, he brings up the past, saying that he worked with his brother Sam. This instantly makes Nathan want to be a part of this story and the two of them form a bond. These two believe that a fortune left behind by Ferdinand Magellan over 500 years ago is still sitting somewhere in the world. They take this journey together, but they're not the only ones after this treasure, which leads to a lot of predictability as well.
When I first heard that Tom Holland was cast to play Nathan Drake and Mark Wahlberg would be playing Sully, I, like many other fans, was left scratching my head. It was clear that they wanted to start these characters younger than they were in the game in order to build a long-running franchise, but it just didn't seem right. Again, I'm wasn't about to let my love of the games sway me in any direction though. I'm a huge fan of both Holland and Wahlberg, so here's the catch-22 happening in my head. Did I enjoy this movie overall and did I enjoy these two in their respective roles? I absolutely did! Do I still feel that it was a little miscast and that they should've been older? I absolutely do! For both of those reasons and for a few negatives I'm about to get into, I believe Uncharted is an okay, entertaining movie for the most part.
Ruben Fleischer has been a very hit-or-miss director for me, directing both Zombieland films, which I think are great, as well as Venom, which I had some fun with, but he has also done some pretty bad films in Gangster Squad and 30 Minutes or Less. His films always have a very clean look to them and a silly/fun tone. I was worried that tone wouldn't fit an Uncharted movie and I do feel that way after having seen the film as well. Bright and colourful (other than landscapes around them) is not how I ever saw an Uncharted movie looking, but again, it was adapted and I'm not going to complain about the look. What I feel is the weakest aspect of this film is the fact that there's absolutely no grit. Nobody is ever dirty, there's barely any blood, and it never feels like stakes are high because these characters can go through a lot without a scratch.
Overall, I probably have more to critique than praise when talking about Uncharted, but that's just because the Screenplay felt like it was hitting random bullet points instead of fleshing out the world they're living in. It never felt lived-in. Still, I love the cast (including Antonio Banderas and Sophia Ali as well), the banter between Nathan and Sully was fun, the action is cool, and I left the theatre feeling positive enough about the film that I would love to see them continue. I will gladly go back for a sequel, but I just hope they evolve these characters more and get down to a grittier, dirtier story. Yes, the point of Uncharted is to have fun and tell a great story, but I felt the story was a little hollow here. I think it's a movie worth seeing and I recommend it because I think there is potential for so much better in the future. This film is just okay overall, but the groundwork has now been laid for something even better.
Not any good? The CGI effects are pretty special, but personally I often get bored when the CGI effects are the only thing keeping a movie afloat. And there are basically only 2 CGI spectacle scenes that are noteworthy and even those I found somewhat overkill and boring.
Let's forget about the story. This is merely another adventure movie, like the Pirates of the Carribean meets National Treasure. It'll do if there is nothing else to watch, but dont expect any originality, dont expect many laughs and dont expect much thrillling action either...
Or you may not like the casting. Holland aside, it is Wahlberg who seems missplaced as Sully. I reckon since he was considered for the Nathan Drake part (which I guess tells you how long this must have been in development, no offense), they thought "well at least he can play this mentor role".
Well Mentor may be stretching it a bit .. but you get where I am going with this. Drakes and Sullys relationship is explored or rather established in a different light and tone ... which you'll either find fine or disturbing I guess. Also Holland still seems so incredibly young you may feel he's too young ... again, you have to get over certain things.
There's enough entertainment and action in this to keep you on the edge of your seat. Solid stunts and digital effects work. Not all twists work, but even the weird choice for Wahlberg as Sully actually can work for the viewer (again: suspension of disbelief) ... one thing is for sure: the chemistry between the two leads is incredible! Try to enjoy this for what it is .. even if you are a hardcore fan of the games ... or not.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe film is the first feature production of Sony's PlayStation Productions.
- गूफ़As depicted in the film, the types of ships used by Magellan on his voyage were carracks. At the time of their use, these were not ships known for their resistance to the elements. In fact, constant maintenance was required lest they literally deteriorate while in use. Such ships, after having been abandoned and partially submerged, while also in a tropical climate, would likely have rotted away to nothing after such a time.
- भाव
Hotel Guest: [on seeing Nate and Chloe coming out of the ocean] Whoa! What the hell happened to you two?
Nathan Drake: [exasperated] Fell out of a car that fell out of a plane.
Hotel Guest: [bluntly] Huh. You know something like that happened to me once.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटThere are two post credit scenes, one of which plays right after the movie finishes
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Chris Stuckmann Movie Reviews: Uncharted (2022)
टॉप पसंद
- How long is Uncharted?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Uncharted: Fuera del mapa
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $12,00,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $14,86,48,820
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $4,40,10,155
- 20 फ़र॰ 2022
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $40,71,41,258
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 56 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1