IMDb रेटिंग
7.7/10
3.5 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
डेविड एटनबरो और वैज्ञानिक जोहान रॉक्स्ट्रॉम पृथ्वी की जैव विविधता के पतन और इस संकट को कैसे टाला जा सकता है इसकी जांच करते हैं.डेविड एटनबरो और वैज्ञानिक जोहान रॉक्स्ट्रॉम पृथ्वी की जैव विविधता के पतन और इस संकट को कैसे टाला जा सकता है इसकी जांच करते हैं.डेविड एटनबरो और वैज्ञानिक जोहान रॉक्स्ट्रॉम पृथ्वी की जैव विविधता के पतन और इस संकट को कैसे टाला जा सकता है इसकी जांच करते हैं.
फ़ोटो
Elena Bennett
- Self - McGill University, Montréal
- (as Prof. Elena Bennett)
Jason Box
- Self - Geological Survey of Denmark & Greenland
- (as Prof. Jason Box)
Terry Hughes
- Self - Arc Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies
- (as Prof. Terry Hughes)
Anne Larigauderie
- Self - Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
- (as Prof. Anne Larigauderie)
María Neira
- Self - World Health Organisation
- (as Dr. María Neira)
Carlos Nobre
- Self - Institute of Advanced Studies University of Säo Paulo
- (as Prof. Carlos Nobre)
Daniella Teixeira
- Self - Environmentalist at University of Queensland
- (as Dr. Daniella Teixeira)
Greta Thunberg
- Self - Environment Activist
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
Ricarda Winkelmann
- Self - Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
- (as Prof. Ricarda Winkelmann)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
David Attenborough is a hopeless optimist and in connection with the concept of Planetary Boundaries this gets to a point where it becomes nearly comical.
A major flaw of the film is that it is sometimes so unprecisein it's science that it verges on being incorrect. It insinuates, for example, that if we start living inside Planetary Boundaries today we cound somehow get all the toothpaste that has already left the tube back in. This is, especially for the climate boundary (and consequentially for the ocean acidification boundary, the connection of which is clearly explained in the film), simply not the case.
Another flaw is that the things we actually can do, right now, are given not very much space in the film. Especially the connection between a meat-centric diet an the bondaries land-use change, biodiversity loss and nitrogen/phosporous cycle are nor at all explained,
But what can I say? Johann Rockström on Netflix. All is not lost. This should receive a huge audience.
I also think that science is only one part of solving this puzzle. Mr. Rockstöm and Mr. Attenborough telling us that we can solve the crisis by cutting, as private citizens, our emissions in halfge every decade, is really, REALLY oversimplifying things. We as private citizens can rearrange the deckchairs but without politics steering the whole ship away from the iceberg this will not do, not by a long shot.
A major flaw of the film is that it is sometimes so unprecisein it's science that it verges on being incorrect. It insinuates, for example, that if we start living inside Planetary Boundaries today we cound somehow get all the toothpaste that has already left the tube back in. This is, especially for the climate boundary (and consequentially for the ocean acidification boundary, the connection of which is clearly explained in the film), simply not the case.
Another flaw is that the things we actually can do, right now, are given not very much space in the film. Especially the connection between a meat-centric diet an the bondaries land-use change, biodiversity loss and nitrogen/phosporous cycle are nor at all explained,
But what can I say? Johann Rockström on Netflix. All is not lost. This should receive a huge audience.
I also think that science is only one part of solving this puzzle. Mr. Rockstöm and Mr. Attenborough telling us that we can solve the crisis by cutting, as private citizens, our emissions in halfge every decade, is really, REALLY oversimplifying things. We as private citizens can rearrange the deckchairs but without politics steering the whole ship away from the iceberg this will not do, not by a long shot.
One of the eye opening documentary I ever watched. Must watch/ Must recommend for everyone, watch for sake of the saving the our planet.
It is definitely worth of your 1 hour 13 minutes time to watch this science-based documentary about how humanity has the dominant role, as Sir David Attenborough perfectly highlighted on his closing narrative, as the only Earth's conscience and brain, whether to lead the world and its ecosystems to the danger zones by continuously doing our business as usual, or to secure the future with a healthy and fresh air, clean water, stable climate, nutritious land, and resilient planet, by doing everything we can to not break the planetary boundaries.
It's easy to see how humans are responsible for the devastation done to the environment. Industrialists and the governing bodies of every country are 100% responsible for this. It's the end. I'll be gone, and you may be gone, but the future of humanity is without doubt going to be filled with strife, and probably extinction of 99.9% of life on the planet. No one cared, so no one will live. It's the apocalypse, and you are all here to witness.
A great flood is coming after fires that burn the planet. Wild stuff.
A great flood is coming after fires that burn the planet. Wild stuff.
10aerkiner
This is years of research, science-backed information being shared about what has happened due to current normalized daily practices and what will happen if we continue the same way without changing our approach of how we live on plant earth. We all have to take action now!
क्या आपको पता है
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Breaking Boundaries: The Science of Our Planet?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Руйнуючи межі: Науковий погляд на нашу планету
- उत्पादन कंपनी
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 13 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
टॉप गैप
By what name was Breaking Boundaries: The Science of Our Planet (2021) officially released in Japan in Japanese?
जवाब