IMDb रेटिंग
4.6/10
8.8 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
जब एक नकलची हमला करता है, तो दो जासूस एक शीर्ष सीरियल किलर से मदद मांगते हैं.जब एक नकलची हमला करता है, तो दो जासूस एक शीर्ष सीरियल किलर से मदद मांगते हैं.जब एक नकलची हमला करता है, तो दो जासूस एक शीर्ष सीरियल किलर से मदद मांगते हैं.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
Nikola Chupin
- Asian Boy
- (as Nikola S. Chupin)
Lizz Lane
- Brunette Woman
- (as Elizabeth Jarnagin)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Love the concept,love this genre. That's where it starts and well ends.
We tried to watch it twice,it landed up being background noise and then we decided to find literally anything else to watch.
This movie has A grade actors but thats all.
The lead actress was not a great choice for this role.
It's comes across as her reading her lines rather than becoming the character. She is like an amber Heard choice pretty face no depth.
It was badly written I felt bad for the actors having to act out those lines.
If they got better writers and a better leading lady it would be an awesome movie. Its meh.
We tried to watch it twice,it landed up being background noise and then we decided to find literally anything else to watch.
This movie has A grade actors but thats all.
The lead actress was not a great choice for this role.
It's comes across as her reading her lines rather than becoming the character. She is like an amber Heard choice pretty face no depth.
It was badly written I felt bad for the actors having to act out those lines.
If they got better writers and a better leading lady it would be an awesome movie. Its meh.
Serial killer movies is quite difficult to make. Much like horror movies, they are constructed around cliche. The key is character build up and craftmanship. Mindcage is full of cliche and none of craftmanship and character build up.
At times the movie seem to be over the top constructed around the cliches, and at that at beginner level, i.e. The red herrings are too obvious, and theses are crucial to mystery movies.
The movie also lacks fluency, i.e. The scenes are mechanically put together in segments with disturbedly incoherency.
Actorwise the selection is poorly made, especially the supporting roles. The husband of the lead character and the prison psychologist is a joke. Martin Lawrence will never be able to pull of a serious character/movie. Malkovitch tries his best, but delivers his standard unsettling character. Knepper is good as the sheriff and is always watchable.
It is not a terrible movie as such, but could have been done better by working the script more and used other actors. The movie uses some tricks to make it different from other serial killer movies. I cannot reveal them here since it would spoil the movie, but I would have used these tricks more and created fusion of horror/serial killer/mystery movie.
All in all, it is not a terrible movie, I have seen much worse. The movie is just flat. IMDB rates it, to this date, 4,1/10 and that is quite correct.
At times the movie seem to be over the top constructed around the cliches, and at that at beginner level, i.e. The red herrings are too obvious, and theses are crucial to mystery movies.
The movie also lacks fluency, i.e. The scenes are mechanically put together in segments with disturbedly incoherency.
Actorwise the selection is poorly made, especially the supporting roles. The husband of the lead character and the prison psychologist is a joke. Martin Lawrence will never be able to pull of a serious character/movie. Malkovitch tries his best, but delivers his standard unsettling character. Knepper is good as the sheriff and is always watchable.
It is not a terrible movie as such, but could have been done better by working the script more and used other actors. The movie uses some tricks to make it different from other serial killer movies. I cannot reveal them here since it would spoil the movie, but I would have used these tricks more and created fusion of horror/serial killer/mystery movie.
All in all, it is not a terrible movie, I have seen much worse. The movie is just flat. IMDB rates it, to this date, 4,1/10 and that is quite correct.
Martin fan here. I'll also candidly admit, we watched to see if he could pull off a strictly serious role because we didn't remember any movie in which he previously did so... NOPE. It was just, strange. Not sure if it was the acting, script or chemistry or a combination but just.. NO. Secondly, there were so many scenes that just screamed careless. Driving while the car was obviously in park... ect. Did even they TRY? All in all, the had an interesting premise (albeit a ripoff in large chunks) that given to the right team could have been interesting. The twist at the end was cute. Husband fell asleep and I sat there.. SOUR.
This is such a blatant rip off of silence of the lambs that it doesn't even try to hide it. They should've just name the two characters Clarice and Hannibal and got it over with. With that being said, it's not a terrible movie by any stretch but so many parallels to SOTL that's it's hard to ignore and enjoy.
John Malkovitch is excellent as always, but I'm surprised that he took the role knowing about the rip off. In the movie they are chasing a copy cat killer which is interesting because this is a copy cat movie.
They even trick the serial killer into leaving his cell so they can go in and investigate just like they did to Lecter in SOTL.
John Malkovitch is excellent as always, but I'm surprised that he took the role knowing about the rip off. In the movie they are chasing a copy cat killer which is interesting because this is a copy cat movie.
They even trick the serial killer into leaving his cell so they can go in and investigate just like they did to Lecter in SOTL.
I mean I could look it up but I just don't have the energy or the care. This plot is so bad it's actually kind of funny. I knew from the first minute this movie would be a pile of poop. But I like B movies.
Lionsgate man, why? I mean I guess Jon and Martin needed some cash or something, but at least use a workable script. I can't wait to see the score on this movie in a few weeks. My guess is it's sub 4.
I liked he creativity a little, but overall it's just so bad and poorly done it can't be redeemable. I did like the lead female character.
Watch this movie if you want to chuckle but make sure you're at least 2-3 wines deep. 3/10 just because I laughed a lot and the plot is so bad. So bad 😂
Lionsgate man, why? I mean I guess Jon and Martin needed some cash or something, but at least use a workable script. I can't wait to see the score on this movie in a few weeks. My guess is it's sub 4.
I liked he creativity a little, but overall it's just so bad and poorly done it can't be redeemable. I did like the lead female character.
Watch this movie if you want to chuckle but make sure you're at least 2-3 wines deep. 3/10 just because I laughed a lot and the plot is so bad. So bad 😂
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाDirector Mauro Borrelli was initially surprised that a producer suggested that he cast Martin Lawrence, a comedian, in this movie. However, when Borrelli met Lawrence, he liked the sound of Lawrence's voice and because of Lawrence's stand-up background and ability to remember two hours worth of comic material, Borrelli believed that Lawrence would be easy to work with.
- गूफ़The photo of Mary Kelly's father at his funeral was captioned "Elias Kelly". Mary Kelly's maiden name was Allen, as seen earlier on her marriage certificate, married to Dale Kelly, so obviously her dad would have been Elias Allen.
His name is very not important to the story. Neither helpful nor interesting.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Mindcage?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Jaula mental
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- Fayetteville, अर्कांसस, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका(Mindcage - Wikipedia)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $4,59,522
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 36 मि(96 min)
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39:1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें