IMDb रेटिंग
4.6/10
13 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
1969 में एक युवा जज क्रैन्डल और उनके बचपन के दोस्त एक प्राचीन बुराई का सामना करने के लिए एकजुट हुए, जिसने उनके गृहनगर लुडलो को अपनी चपेट में ले लिया था।1969 में एक युवा जज क्रैन्डल और उनके बचपन के दोस्त एक प्राचीन बुराई का सामना करने के लिए एकजुट हुए, जिसने उनके गृहनगर लुडलो को अपनी चपेट में ले लिया था।1969 में एक युवा जज क्रैन्डल और उनके बचपन के दोस्त एक प्राचीन बुराई का सामना करने के लिए एकजुट हुए, जिसने उनके गृहनगर लुडलो को अपनी चपेट में ले लिया था।
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- पुरस्कार
- 1 जीत और कुल 2 नामांकन
Isabella LaBlanc
- Donna
- (as Isabella Star LaBlanc)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Quick review: I had really hoped I was going to enjoy 'Pet Sematary: Bloodlines', however very early on in the film I knew I was going to struggle with it. The reason? I could not find a single character who was likeable or charismatic enough to care about. Without that being there it is so hard to stay invested and care about the outcome of the film.
There are a lot of cheap jump-scares in this film. People and trucks just appear out of nowhere and we get a loud jolt of music with them. Otherwise though, the film really doesn't have a way to scare you. I was a bit let down by this one. I didn't expect a masterpiece, but I expected more than we got. 4/10.
There are a lot of cheap jump-scares in this film. People and trucks just appear out of nowhere and we get a loud jolt of music with them. Otherwise though, the film really doesn't have a way to scare you. I was a bit let down by this one. I didn't expect a masterpiece, but I expected more than we got. 4/10.
This is the weirdest directing I've ever seen in a movie, special mention to the editing part that made everything even more confusing and boring.
Basic TV movies are more entertaining than this and... based on Stephen King's amazing novel? How can someone ruin a beautiful horror story like this?
There were about 20 minutes left and all I could think was "what in the H am I watching?!".
This to be avoided, just know there is no "horror" in this movie and no direction whatsoever. Feels like someone had the money to play "let's direct a movie and then go eat pizza because I don't even care..."
Basic TV movies are more entertaining than this and... based on Stephen King's amazing novel? How can someone ruin a beautiful horror story like this?
There were about 20 minutes left and all I could think was "what in the H am I watching?!".
This to be avoided, just know there is no "horror" in this movie and no direction whatsoever. Feels like someone had the money to play "let's direct a movie and then go eat pizza because I don't even care..."
Great cast, I just wish Samantha Mathis had more of a role. A few good, creepy moments. Unfortunately, by the third act of the movie, some of the scenes/scenarios became completely absurd. There were the typical tropes of people doing incredibly stupid things-but it's a horror movie, so that's expected. Yelling at the TV doesn't help. I tried. The idiots died anyway. I found myself rolling my eyes more than anything else. The undead could seemingly teleport and do superman type of stuff. Sometimes people say a movie might have been better had they edited out 20-30 minutes. Not this movie. This was very tightly edited and could have used a bit more exposition. Just being familiar with the Pet Sematary story helped fill-in some of the blanks. Really wanted to like this. Given the caliber of the cast, I think a lot of people were rooting for this movie. Glad I saw it, just wouldn't watch it again.
This film is just bad. Pretty much in every way. They must have either ran out of budget or had to cut run time because this movie is utter nonsense. I kind of, maybe get what they were trying to do, but it's so poorly crafted and executed it's not worth watching.
Here are things that suck:
1. The plot doesn't make sense and really has nothing to do with the original Pet Sematery.
2. There's no one to root for and no one to care about. Live or die, I literally do not care what happens to any characters.
3. There's no point and the core premise is so confusing I really don't know why this was made.
4. The final act they just gave up. I don't know why characters are doing what they're doing. Nor do I care.
Bad filmmaking 101 - 2.2/10.
Here are things that suck:
1. The plot doesn't make sense and really has nothing to do with the original Pet Sematery.
2. There's no one to root for and no one to care about. Live or die, I literally do not care what happens to any characters.
3. There's no point and the core premise is so confusing I really don't know why this was made.
4. The final act they just gave up. I don't know why characters are doing what they're doing. Nor do I care.
Bad filmmaking 101 - 2.2/10.
Pet Sematary: Bloodlines managed to impress me, despite its lacklustre reception among the general public and its direct-to-tv or streaming release.
Make no mistake however, Pet Sematary: Bloodlines maintains an honest Stephen King vibe reminiscent of 80s-90s classics like "Stand by Me," "IT," or even a slight ambiance of the original Pet Sematary.
Adapting a story with established foundations is always a challenge, requiring a delicate balance of relevance, novelty, and faithfulness to the source material. In this regard, Pet Sematary: Bloodlines hits the mark rather admirably.
While not a masterpiece, the film deserves recognition for several reasons. The cinematography feels both vintage and fresh. Additionally, the cast includes well-known but somewhat forgotten actors like David Duchovny (X-Files, Californication) and Henry Thomas, (E. T, Legends of the Fall) evoking a sense of nostalgia reminiscent of films from that era.
The acting is solid overall, with Natalie Alyn Lind impressing me immensely and Jackson White delivering commendable performances. Although White's portrayal didn't captivate me as much, he still stood out as unique and likable character.
However, Pet Sematary: Bloodlines does fall short in some key areas. The kills are relatively tame, the suspense feels subdued, and the characters, while possessing personality, lack significant depth. Additionally, the ending feels rushed and somewhat cheap, detracting some chemistry and memorability from the overall viewing experience.
Despite these flaws, Pet Sematary: Bloodlines exceeded my expectations. While it may not offer many surprises due to its familiar story and lack of surprises, it still holds up as a solid stand-alone film. Surprisingly, I wouldn't hesitate to re-watch the film, as it provided me with a thoroughly entertaining experience.
6/10.
Make no mistake however, Pet Sematary: Bloodlines maintains an honest Stephen King vibe reminiscent of 80s-90s classics like "Stand by Me," "IT," or even a slight ambiance of the original Pet Sematary.
Adapting a story with established foundations is always a challenge, requiring a delicate balance of relevance, novelty, and faithfulness to the source material. In this regard, Pet Sematary: Bloodlines hits the mark rather admirably.
While not a masterpiece, the film deserves recognition for several reasons. The cinematography feels both vintage and fresh. Additionally, the cast includes well-known but somewhat forgotten actors like David Duchovny (X-Files, Californication) and Henry Thomas, (E. T, Legends of the Fall) evoking a sense of nostalgia reminiscent of films from that era.
The acting is solid overall, with Natalie Alyn Lind impressing me immensely and Jackson White delivering commendable performances. Although White's portrayal didn't captivate me as much, he still stood out as unique and likable character.
However, Pet Sematary: Bloodlines does fall short in some key areas. The kills are relatively tame, the suspense feels subdued, and the characters, while possessing personality, lack significant depth. Additionally, the ending feels rushed and somewhat cheap, detracting some chemistry and memorability from the overall viewing experience.
Despite these flaws, Pet Sematary: Bloodlines exceeded my expectations. While it may not offer many surprises due to its familiar story and lack of surprises, it still holds up as a solid stand-alone film. Surprisingly, I wouldn't hesitate to re-watch the film, as it provided me with a thoroughly entertaining experience.
6/10.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe dog that plays Hedricks is an Australian Cattle Dog named Jellybean. Jellybean was born in Reno Nevada. He holds three Guinness world records and is completely deaf.
- गूफ़When Timmy and Hendrix are brought back from the dead, this is clearly the first time Jud has experienced something like this. But in the first movie, it's established that Jud knew about the burial ground as a young boy, because he buried his dog there.
- भाव
[after Marjorie shows up to a meeting looking rough]
Dan Crandall: Marjorie. What... oh, my... what happened?
[Marjorie sits down]
Marjorie Washburn: I killed Baterman's fucking dog. Now we gotta get Timmy.
- कनेक्शनFeatures Pet Sematary (2019)
- साउंडट्रैकBad Moon Rising
Written by John Fogerty
Performed by Creedence Clearwater Revival
Courtesy of Craft Recordings, a Division of Concord
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Pet Sematary: Bloodlines?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Cementerio de animales: El origen
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $2,00,00,000(अनुमानित)
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 27 मि(87 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39:1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें