एक महिला पत्रकार एक पुरानी हत्या की गुत्थी सुलझाने की कोशिश करती है, लेकिन जैसे-जैसे वह अधिक गहराई में जाती है, उसे शहर की अंधेरी सच्चाइयों और अपने खुद के रहस्यों का सामना करना पड़ता है.एक महिला पत्रकार एक पुरानी हत्या की गुत्थी सुलझाने की कोशिश करती है, लेकिन जैसे-जैसे वह अधिक गहराई में जाती है, उसे शहर की अंधेरी सच्चाइयों और अपने खुद के रहस्यों का सामना करना पड़ता है.एक महिला पत्रकार एक पुरानी हत्या की गुत्थी सुलझाने की कोशिश करती है, लेकिन जैसे-जैसे वह अधिक गहराई में जाती है, उसे शहर की अंधेरी सच्चाइयों और अपने खुद के रहस्यों का सामना करना पड़ता है.
- पुरस्कार
- 2 कुल नामांकन
एपिसोड ब्राउज़ करें
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
It's 1966 Thanksgiving in Baltimore. A little Jewish girl gets taken by Santa Claus. Maddie Schwartz (Natalie Portman) has a connection to the girl and has a passing encounter with Cleo Johnson (Moses Ingram). Both women are mothers and struggling with the men in their lives. Both are downtrodden in different ways. Maddie leaves her husband and goes searching for the little girl. Cleo Johnson (Moses Ingram) is the narrator trying to survive her corrupt boss who runs the numbers and a savvy politician looking to clean up the corruption.
This limited series starts with a problem. I don't always like narrations and this one promises something. It's Cleo Johnson talking. She claims that Maddie comes in to write about her but doesn't actually know her life while she's alive. With that opening, I expect Cleo to be dead by the first episode. Instead, it's another character and let's not talk about the twist. Basically, it promises one thing and does a switch or two switches. I actually like the style and the story until the ending. This show has some good elements like Natalie Portman, but it keeps on dropping the ball.
This limited series starts with a problem. I don't always like narrations and this one promises something. It's Cleo Johnson talking. She claims that Maddie comes in to write about her but doesn't actually know her life while she's alive. With that opening, I expect Cleo to be dead by the first episode. Instead, it's another character and let's not talk about the twist. Basically, it promises one thing and does a switch or two switches. I actually like the style and the story until the ending. This show has some good elements like Natalie Portman, but it keeps on dropping the ball.
Drama and story-telling for grown-ups.
I can see why some people don't like this. It's not conventional and simple story-telling. The two main characters, Cleo Johnson and Maddie Schwartz are deeply flawed people. Schwartz especially so, as she is quite unsympathetic and unlikeable. Johnson's story is that of a smart person who can't stop making bad choices. I find all this refreshing and relatable. It's so much more like real life. If you're bored with it, good for you - go back to your Marvel movies or 'Emily in Paris'.
I also get to play one of my favorite TV and movie games - spot the twist in advance. I know there's one or two big ones here, but by episode three they aren't revealed, so it's fun to try and guess. Maddie Schwartz was suspiciously quick in finding a murder victim in a very remote location; something tells me that will have a bearing on things.
Kudos also to Jennifer Mogbock in episode 1. Her character is forced to sing on stage while severely intoxicated and manages to turn it into something strange and beautiful. Actually 'strange and beautiful' sums up the best about this show when it's hitting its high notes.
I can see why some people don't like this. It's not conventional and simple story-telling. The two main characters, Cleo Johnson and Maddie Schwartz are deeply flawed people. Schwartz especially so, as she is quite unsympathetic and unlikeable. Johnson's story is that of a smart person who can't stop making bad choices. I find all this refreshing and relatable. It's so much more like real life. If you're bored with it, good for you - go back to your Marvel movies or 'Emily in Paris'.
I also get to play one of my favorite TV and movie games - spot the twist in advance. I know there's one or two big ones here, but by episode three they aren't revealed, so it's fun to try and guess. Maddie Schwartz was suspiciously quick in finding a murder victim in a very remote location; something tells me that will have a bearing on things.
Kudos also to Jennifer Mogbock in episode 1. Her character is forced to sing on stage while severely intoxicated and manages to turn it into something strange and beautiful. Actually 'strange and beautiful' sums up the best about this show when it's hitting its high notes.
A drama about two women fighting two different battles to achieve a common goal. A drama about freedom told with magnificent visuals supported with great music. Dynamic set of characters that enables a wide exploration into the western society that's undergoing rapid change. Sincere performances by the cast full of expression. There are no heroines even the central characters are criticized for their selfish desperations. It's different not the typical thriller most of us come looking for yet succeeds in keeping any viewer engaged till the very end. Absence of a one central theme makes this watch even more worthwhile.
The series first episodes are captivating but gradually, once well within the story, starts to take you through long dream sequences which is a lazy way of bringing a little insight into certain aspects of the caracter. By the third one I was climbing up the walls and resisting the fast forward button. Great cinematography, costumes, settings but some caracteres such as the journalists are depicted in a very obvious cartoony way. Some acting is very good, some scenes not so much. This series could have been at least two episodes shorter and would've strengthened the plot. It took a little effort to plow through the last episodes.
Beautifully shot, well acted but ultimately dull. Far too long to get to the point. I've given up after episode two.
This should have been an hour and a half long made for television film not a short series. I really dislike when programme makers drag a story out just to make it so many episodes long. They turn a good story well acted into something that turns viewers off because of the length of time it takes to tell that original good story.
Please programme makers just make a good film! Is it because they have to pay Natalie Portman a fortune to have a name on the cast and need to get their moneys worth? I don't know but I'm bored so 5 stars and I won't be watching any more.
This should have been an hour and a half long made for television film not a short series. I really dislike when programme makers drag a story out just to make it so many episodes long. They turn a good story well acted into something that turns viewers off because of the length of time it takes to tell that original good story.
Please programme makers just make a good film! Is it because they have to pay Natalie Portman a fortune to have a name on the cast and need to get their moneys worth? I don't know but I'm bored so 5 stars and I won't be watching any more.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाWhile filming, production used the name Flamingo, a reference to the defunct Flamingo Lounge in Baltimore, Maryland, which appears in the novel.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How many seasons does Lady in the Lake have?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें