IMDb रेटिंग
7.9/10
1.6 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अमेरिकी इतिहास के साथ साथ यह श्रृंखला दर्शकों को यह सवाल करने के लिए मजबूर करती है कि असल में संयुक्त राज्य का वास्तविक मतलब क्या है.अमेरिकी इतिहास के साथ साथ यह श्रृंखला दर्शकों को यह सवाल करने के लिए मजबूर करती है कि असल में संयुक्त राज्य का वास्तविक मतलब क्या है.अमेरिकी इतिहास के साथ साथ यह श्रृंखला दर्शकों को यह सवाल करने के लिए मजबूर करती है कि असल में संयुक्त राज्य का वास्तविक मतलब क्या है.
- पुरस्कार
- 4 कुल नामांकन
एपिसोड ब्राउज़ करें
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Awesome up to the last episode when Grover Norquist was a spokesman in favor of equality. He has one single agenda, to keep the rich as rich as they can get off of the working class. Beyond his 3 or 4 interjections it was superb in its presentation, its scope and its choice of voices. I have to believe there was some reason GN got face time on this gem.
Watch it and learn about the 14th amendment. Learn about some history. Just be receptive and thats it.
This is a good introduction to the topic of civil rights in the USA during the last two centuries. It's easy to watch, well presented, and has good choices in music and actors/presenters that should make it appealing to those who are not particularly interested in long documentaries about civil rights. That, in itself, is an achievement.
Having said that, I must also point out that this is NOT a definitive guide to the topic it deals with. If you want to get a full history of civil rights in the country, use the documentary as a trampoline to help you reach other, more in-depth works. Because this documentary cuts on some details that in my opinion are very important.
I won't go in too much detail but I think episode 3 (about the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s) is a good example of this. The entire episode focusses on Martin Luther King's efforts to force John F Kennedy to act against racism, and finally the US President gives in and becomes a 'good guy' who does what was required. Two very important angles are missing. Firstly, the documentary makes no mention whatsoever of other civil rights leaders who also played important roles, such as Malcolm X or Stokely Carmichael. And secondly, the fact is that John F Kennedy did very little in the area of human rights, and it was his predecessor, Lyndon B Johnson, who actually implemented the defining civil rights legislation of the 20th century.
Leaving out such figures as Malcolm X or Lyndon Johnson is understandable because they were very complex and controversial characters. For the general public, it is easier to follow a storyline of good guys and bad guys, and Kennedy and King are both established good guys in American imagination. However, this lack of nuance means that the documentary doesn't quite convey how complicated the fight for civil rights really is.
Having said that, I must also point out that this is NOT a definitive guide to the topic it deals with. If you want to get a full history of civil rights in the country, use the documentary as a trampoline to help you reach other, more in-depth works. Because this documentary cuts on some details that in my opinion are very important.
I won't go in too much detail but I think episode 3 (about the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s) is a good example of this. The entire episode focusses on Martin Luther King's efforts to force John F Kennedy to act against racism, and finally the US President gives in and becomes a 'good guy' who does what was required. Two very important angles are missing. Firstly, the documentary makes no mention whatsoever of other civil rights leaders who also played important roles, such as Malcolm X or Stokely Carmichael. And secondly, the fact is that John F Kennedy did very little in the area of human rights, and it was his predecessor, Lyndon B Johnson, who actually implemented the defining civil rights legislation of the 20th century.
Leaving out such figures as Malcolm X or Lyndon Johnson is understandable because they were very complex and controversial characters. For the general public, it is easier to follow a storyline of good guys and bad guys, and Kennedy and King are both established good guys in American imagination. However, this lack of nuance means that the documentary doesn't quite convey how complicated the fight for civil rights really is.
Good documentary about the 14th amendment and the fight for equality (racial, gender, etc.) in the US. More focused in the history and not so much in discussing the present times. Smart decision.
Excellent documentary on America and how since before the civil war conservators were leading the country, how the south and their frustrations after losing the war destroyed and manipulated everything to control the resistance to racism, human rights movement, women liberation. Quite an eye opening. Everyone that dislike this are certainly descendants of the white supremacy sinners and cause of all that is negative in the country...From Lincoln to Reagan to Trump...From Confederate illness to manipulation of the truth....to be seen and used as reference...
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाJoseph Gordon-Levitt puts voice to Andrew Johnson, Vice-President to Abraham Lincoln. In the movie Lincoln, he played Lincoln's son, Robert.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How many seasons does Amend: The Fight for America have?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Değişiklik Yap: ABD'de Eşitlik Mücadelesi
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- रंग
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें