Damon's Revenge

After surviving the Liberty Manor massacre in Rhode Island, Adrianna (Chelsea Vale) is viewed as a sort of local celebrity. Her wild child friend from college (Hannah Dannelly) invites her out to a rural vacation home to party with friends and recover. Unfortunately, Tina has an unhealthy interest in the massacre and, worse, the Wampanoag mafia chief might no longer be in custody. Havoc ensues.

"Damon's Revenge" (2022) adequately relays what happens to the survivors of the film from the year before, but you won't find much elaboration on the title character. Disregarding his appearing in a recap, Damon doesn't surface until the very end. I was hoping for details on why he likes to torment Indian lasses in his torture chamber, as well as why the Wampanoag mafia hired him (no doubt because he's an effective killer, huh?).

Another issue is that this isn't as ambitious as the first movie, but at least it's a little creative with the hackneyed cabin-in-the-woods plot. The nudity is way toned down and there are no torture chamber sequences (not that I care about either). The women aren't as notable either. Still, the voice dubbing has been fixed (compared to the prior film) and Chelsea Vale makes for a serviceable protagonist, plus there are enough interesting things to keep one's attention, like the Wampanoag chief convincing an Indian deputy to do such-and-such.

The film runs 1 hour, 29 minutes, and was shot in Cromwell, Connecticut, which is in the heart of the state just south of Hartford on the Connecticut River.

GRADE: C+

Do not watch this movie high. Beware it is the worst acting ever. Especially Michael madsen in the first scene. He sounds like he is reading his lines for the first time and having a hard time seeing the words. That's about as far as I got into the movie while writing this review. You've been warned. Enjoy! I'm sad I never saw the movie that came before this. Also ladies, do not flash boobs for alcohol. There is an Edward Norton (younger years) evil character lookalike. I honestly have no idea what is going on in this movie but it makes for a good distraction and background noise. Probably should watch the first movie.

It's a sequel to Burial Ground Massacre. I knew something was wrong, but when everything is wrong, it's easy to miss it. Anyway, the plot you read on IMDB starts about 1 hour into the movie, don't even remember what happened before that. It has some hilariously bad moments, and overall the line deliveries, sound editing and dialog are all so terrible that you may get a decent laugh out of it. Not 100% sure there was a plot though.

The more stupid, the rougher names the dafter the games, loads of names of the past, some have had some real good assisting roles back then, but their stardome has faded since then, and itll soon be time to shut the cuffin due to lack of talent.

A film produced and acted this way, where inconsistence are the rule, and tunnelvision seems to be the norm, and worst of all dragging indigeonous peoples mythological mysteries into the salad is not very honourable filmaking at all, cause its all coming from the idea of halloween, just a bit more testosterone filled and stashly bearded styled men, and bellybuttonringed lesbianistic experimentrialismic females, trying to run away form a nightmare, a nightmare thats imposed on you like youve seen 10 prequels to this one...

no, look at the brand, and look at the names, tom sizemore wont get bigger, and michael madsen wont become mads mikkelsen, thats for sure. And the grumpy old man wont be any younger, wastng valuable time left to live on homebreed stuff like this, its just a notch above one...''hud'' by løckeberg is better than this.

It's not over until the fat man sings, and 10 minutes in I'm singing soprano with gusto. Feels like Tom Sizemore has given up on his craft and Michael Madsen must have been there for the free food. If you manage to keep watching, you will be rewarded with bad acting and vocal fry. The movie should have used Robert LaSardo more, he was the best actor in this thing. Not even the brief nudity at 56:38 and the following shower scene could raise my rating. Would I recommend this, nope.