A Mistake
- 2024
- 1 घं 41 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
5.7/10
1.4 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंIn the midst of a new scheme to publicly report surgeons' performance, a gifted surgeon's life is thrown into disarray as her colleagues begin to close ranks, and even her partner who is a n... सभी पढ़ेंIn the midst of a new scheme to publicly report surgeons' performance, a gifted surgeon's life is thrown into disarray as her colleagues begin to close ranks, and even her partner who is a nurse at the hospital turns her back on her.In the midst of a new scheme to publicly report surgeons' performance, a gifted surgeon's life is thrown into disarray as her colleagues begin to close ranks, and even her partner who is a nurse at the hospital turns her back on her.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
Chelsie Preston Crayford
- Registrar
- (as Chelsie Preston-Crayford)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Elizabeth Banks is among my most favorite actresses - her latest movie was a must-see.
But, in hindsight, I am asking why.
1) This movie is set in New Zealand.
First of all, why do so many actors in this movie have an accent which doesn't resemble the Kiwi one? I have loads of friends from New Zealand and none of them sound like in this movie.
If anything, some of the actors sound very British instead.
2) While the premise of the movie is a decent one, the pace of this movie isn't keeping up with it. At times it feels a bit slow and boring.
3) Many of my family members are doctors, nurses or work in key roles in a hospital. While mistakes do happen, the details of the movie aren't likely under many circumstances. The medical devices used, protocols followed, and education/mentorship received is very exact these days and follows a strict regime.
4) Several story elements don't make much sense. Why was it such a big deal that some dog stays with her? How come that a lead surgeon/medical degree holder who isn't into cars drives a BMW E30 (a classic which would need a huge amount of effort/passion/tech to be on the road)? Why the crass language and swearing all the time by a degree-qualified doctor... profanities to show the extreme situation she is in? It can be done with a better script.
Why don't the lead actress and the protege have no chemistry at all?
Elizabeth Banks is still a great actress, but I don't think a medical drama is something she should do often.
Maybe the standards of movie making are lower for films set in New Zealand.
But, in hindsight, I am asking why.
1) This movie is set in New Zealand.
First of all, why do so many actors in this movie have an accent which doesn't resemble the Kiwi one? I have loads of friends from New Zealand and none of them sound like in this movie.
If anything, some of the actors sound very British instead.
2) While the premise of the movie is a decent one, the pace of this movie isn't keeping up with it. At times it feels a bit slow and boring.
3) Many of my family members are doctors, nurses or work in key roles in a hospital. While mistakes do happen, the details of the movie aren't likely under many circumstances. The medical devices used, protocols followed, and education/mentorship received is very exact these days and follows a strict regime.
4) Several story elements don't make much sense. Why was it such a big deal that some dog stays with her? How come that a lead surgeon/medical degree holder who isn't into cars drives a BMW E30 (a classic which would need a huge amount of effort/passion/tech to be on the road)? Why the crass language and swearing all the time by a degree-qualified doctor... profanities to show the extreme situation she is in? It can be done with a better script.
Why don't the lead actress and the protege have no chemistry at all?
Elizabeth Banks is still a great actress, but I don't think a medical drama is something she should do often.
Maybe the standards of movie making are lower for films set in New Zealand.
In writer / director Christine Jeffs' tv-standard New Zealand medical drama "A Mistake" senior surgeon Elizabeth Banks leads a team in an operation in which an error is made, that MAY have contributed to the patient's death hours later. The patient's parents formally complain, Banks & team are scapegoated by the hospital's administration (led by Simon McBurney (excellent)), and their lives begin to miserably crumble. Being so dry, downbeat, & depressing it was perhaps a mistake for star name Banks to get involved. Its noble message is that healthcare workers are over-worked & under-appreciated, but there must be more effective ways of conveying that.
I love New Zealand and its people, I really do. But we are a very safe and predictable people, and so we tend to write terrible books (I should know I was forced to read a number of them in school) and make extremely bland films. 'A Mistake' is no exception. Sure, we got some Hollywood talent across the Pacific for this one, but the result was the same.
In fairness its not all bad. I quite like a film that bases itself around a simple concept, or one minor event that leads to a number of consequences. For a film like that, this is about as good as you can expect. Yes a lot of the drama feels very forced and the characters are absolutely ridiculous and in no way resemble how normal people act, but hey, I guess you have to jazz things up a bit for the sake of the film.
I don't know, I guess it's just disappointing because you almost always know exactly what you're going to get with a New Zealand made film. I keep waiting for the day someone breaks the mold, but this wasn't that occasion. A generous 6/10.
In fairness its not all bad. I quite like a film that bases itself around a simple concept, or one minor event that leads to a number of consequences. For a film like that, this is about as good as you can expect. Yes a lot of the drama feels very forced and the characters are absolutely ridiculous and in no way resemble how normal people act, but hey, I guess you have to jazz things up a bit for the sake of the film.
I don't know, I guess it's just disappointing because you almost always know exactly what you're going to get with a New Zealand made film. I keep waiting for the day someone breaks the mold, but this wasn't that occasion. A generous 6/10.
We are living in an age of two conditions. On the one hand we have too much information out of context and so, this becomes misinformation. On the other hand we have the withholding of critically important information that could attest truth. In some cases the margins of life and death are defined by one small fact that could have made the difference.
I see people criticising the movie and the acting. I disagree with their opinions and their ratings.
Why?
I have experienced medical malpractice.
A doctor was forced by governmental and hospital rules to prescribe steroid injections for an ocular occlusion, injections directly into the eye that would further exacerbate liver failure and damage the endocrine system.
The alternative was Avastin, a drug used in chemotherapy, the lesser evil and less damaging. Avastin costs only $10 to make but is charged at $1500 per application.i have suffered considerable damage as a direct consequence of the treatments, with no recourse or accountability.
Sure, this movie isn't an action blockbuster. Here we have Elizabeth acting just like a real surgeon. With all the understated mannerisms. Very good acting. Just understated, as it should be for authenticity.
For this reason I think the reviews are unfair.
This is what the medical system is really like.
Political. Manipulative. Selfish.
Administration.
I see people criticising the movie and the acting. I disagree with their opinions and their ratings.
Why?
I have experienced medical malpractice.
A doctor was forced by governmental and hospital rules to prescribe steroid injections for an ocular occlusion, injections directly into the eye that would further exacerbate liver failure and damage the endocrine system.
The alternative was Avastin, a drug used in chemotherapy, the lesser evil and less damaging. Avastin costs only $10 to make but is charged at $1500 per application.i have suffered considerable damage as a direct consequence of the treatments, with no recourse or accountability.
Sure, this movie isn't an action blockbuster. Here we have Elizabeth acting just like a real surgeon. With all the understated mannerisms. Very good acting. Just understated, as it should be for authenticity.
For this reason I think the reviews are unfair.
This is what the medical system is really like.
Political. Manipulative. Selfish.
Administration.
Gifted surgeon Elizabeth Taylor (Elizabeth Banks) finds her life thrown into disarray following a mistake by one of her team during surgery appears to lead to a patient's death. The bureaucratic Head of Surgery Andrew McGrath (Simon McBurney) seems to hold her responsible somehow and tries to control her and what she can say publicly about the incident. He also suspends her and treats her almost as 'the enemy' during the coming weeks.
I suspect most hospitals are run by people like Andrew McGrath and I suspect many health practitioners suffer the heavy hand of that type of bureaucracy. Despite seeming to want transparency and accountability, they seem to only want it on their own terms. It reminded me of course of the many investigations into health care in the UK where hospitals spend many years fighting in court to hide their malpractice. Malpractice that often -when the reports are finally made public- show that the hospital either knew about and tried to hide it, or engineered that malpractice through overly bureaucratic processes that did not fit with quality health care. The parents of the patient who died simply wanted to know the truth about what happened, and yet that was not easily available.
Although this is just a story I suspect it is highlighting the fact that this goes on, every day, in healthcare settings. Politics should have no place in healthcare but sadly it seems most hospitals are run by people like Andrew McGrath.
It's a very thought provoking film and Banks does a brilliant job of bringing Dr Elizabeth Taylor to life. I give it a solid 7.
I suspect most hospitals are run by people like Andrew McGrath and I suspect many health practitioners suffer the heavy hand of that type of bureaucracy. Despite seeming to want transparency and accountability, they seem to only want it on their own terms. It reminded me of course of the many investigations into health care in the UK where hospitals spend many years fighting in court to hide their malpractice. Malpractice that often -when the reports are finally made public- show that the hospital either knew about and tried to hide it, or engineered that malpractice through overly bureaucratic processes that did not fit with quality health care. The parents of the patient who died simply wanted to know the truth about what happened, and yet that was not easily available.
Although this is just a story I suspect it is highlighting the fact that this goes on, every day, in healthcare settings. Politics should have no place in healthcare but sadly it seems most hospitals are run by people like Andrew McGrath.
It's a very thought provoking film and Banks does a brilliant job of bringing Dr Elizabeth Taylor to life. I give it a solid 7.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाBased upon the novel of the same name by Carl Shuker.
- भाव
Elizabeth Taylor: We have a covenant with out patients.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is A Mistake?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $30,212
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $20,656
- 22 सित॰ 2024
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $96,692
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 41 मि(101 min)
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें