I Survived a Crime

The videos are somewhat interesting, albeit nothing that can't easily be found elsewhere. The bigger issue with the show is that it apparently suffered from a low budget. The host was an odd choice. When he narrates scenes he often sounds like he's reading from a notepad or teleprompter. The interviews he conducts with victims are equally cringeworthy. It's also somewhat annoying that a large number of the cases the producers selected have yet to be resolved in court. As a result, the viewer is left to wonder about the outcome in those cases. It's not a show I'd watch again or recommend to anyone.

I am not suprised that this show did only 1 season. Adding background noises to try and "match" what was going on was just Ridiculous, we do not need all that added noise, we know whats going on. Also, not having the cases resolved before being aired on tv, does not allow for a fully finished product. I know she is fighting for her life, do not disrespect it, By adding fake rustling noises. The noise, if there is any, from the actual cctv is more than enough. I hated having to pause, so I could go look up the namr of the suspect and see if ut was resolved. All around, not put together properly.

Most of the situations have results that as of production are still pending. This makes 90% of the episodes not even worth the time it takes to watch them as there is no resolution. Most of the situations have results that as of production are still pending. This makes 90% of the episodes not even worth the time it takes to watch them as there is no resolution. Most of the situations have results that as of production are still pending. This makes 90% of the episodes not even worth the time it takes to watch them as there is no resolution. Most of the situations have results that as of production are still pending. This makes 90% of the episodes not even worth the time it takes to watch them as there is no resolution.

It's got a trashy appeal and but there are YouTube true crime channels with editing and professionalism that would blow this garbage out of the water. That's not my main gripe, though. It's how this show overwhelming portrays black or other POC suspects. For every white suspect, there will be 3-5 segments with a POC. What is this, "COPS?" They also make the perplexing decision to show the suspects charges and sentence, if available. Having this information on the screen just highlights a further disconnect between what sentences white suspects get versus literally everyone else. In a single episode, they showcase a black man who was convicted of vehicular hit-and-run who gets 5 years. The very next segment is a white, middle class man viciously assaulting his wife (resulting in lifetime disability, pain and trauma) and he only gets 3 years, 2 of which were suspended. I get it, they're different states, different histories with law enforcement, and all the other stuff bootlickers say. I'm just wondering why they thought presenting this information side-by-side wouldn't raise some eyebrows.

There are too many dumb individuals in this show which creates apathy. Examples include a woman who just withdrew $75,000 in cash from a bank and is so unaware of her surroundings it's hard to feel bad for her, a couple who doesn't lock their front door, and a woman who doesn't look both ways before crossing the street.

The worst part of this show however is the interviews with the individuals who experienced these events. The last 3 minutes of every episode is unwatchable and doesn't add anything of value. The CC camera footage parts are great, but the host is brutal and nobody cares about the interview after.

If they were smart they would interview the idiots who committed these crimes because that would be worth watching. I'd be more interested in their mindset than the mindset of a person going into survival mode, the majority of which are just stupid individuals.