Psyhi vathia

This film is visually a masterpiece. The same thing can also be told for its haunting music. Sadly, these two elements are hardly enough to make this war drama a memorable film.

Politically speaking, Voulgaris tries his best to overcome his leftist biases and take an objective outlook of the civil war that devastated Greece from 1946 to 1949. His effort, however, falls rather short and the reason for that is not so much his implicit sympathy towards the Left as his exaggerated enthusiasm to maintain an equal distance between the two camps. There are times that Voulgaris becomes so keen on being objective that he actually neglects some other basic elements of the film, such as plot, character development and dramatic conflict (not to speak of historical accuracy or authenticity). Of course, when you make a film of this nature, the last thing you want is to be accused of trying to manipulate the audience. However, telling the viewer at every step of the way "I'm not taking sides, I'm not manipulating you" is also a sort of manipulation and it ultimately kills the dramatic tension on which this picture hugely depends.

History and politics, however, are not the main flaws of the film. In my humble opinion, the reason why this picture fails to make an impression is rather an artistic one. First of all, the characters come across really shallow. No real depth to make us empathize with their cruel destiny. Wooden and non-realistic dialogues play also an essential part in creating a huge distance between us, the viewers, and the dramatic action that takes place in the film. Furthermore, there are problems with the script and the contrived storytelling. The story is mainly based on the "brother against brother" cliche. This is not necessarily a flaw. In fact, it starts as one of the film's strongest points. It's a pity that, as the story progresses, the film doesn't seem to know how to handle it, in order to explore its full dramatic potential. This is also the case with most of the film's themes. They are executed in such a rushed and heavy-handed manner that the viewer ultimately loses all interest in the story. As for the sound and the visuals, they are both of the highest quality. Nevertheless, good photography and music cannot always make up for weak storytelling, especially when we are talking about a war drama.

With these in mind, is no real wonder why the film was reproached by many with being melodramatic. With no solid characters, uninteresting sequences (with a few exceptions) and a rather weak script, a melodrama is all you get in the end.

However, one should not forget that the Greek Civil War is something that still stirs up painful memories in Greek society and trying to make a film about it, takes undoubtedly a certain degree of courage. Voulgaris took a risk where others wouldn't and that does him credit. But, for better or for worse, not all risks pay off.

The issue is sovereignty.

When you visit the military museum in Athens you will find that Greek history is blacked out between 1944 and 1949 jumping from the Nazi retreat in 1944 to The Korean war.

This Movie tells some of that missing story and is a good start for the healing process of the Hellenic Nation. It is impossible to understand what is being undone now by means of reforms under brutal austerity which will bring back old conflict and strive and direct the nation on course of a new civil war. The meddling of exterior parties in Greek affairs has never been greater since the civil war of 1944-49. The war on Greeks is waged financially economically, with information as primary weapon. In 2012 people die, not by napalm but because of lack of Medication and increased suicide rate. And again, they die on both sides.

Given the seriousness of the subject-matter about a period that has left an indelible mark in Greek history and bearing Pantelis Voulgaris's strong directorial credentials in mind, it's astonishing to come across a movie as shallow as this. The main plot about two brothers fighting in opposite sides in Greek Civil War is contrived and unconvincing, and when the movie loses its footing it simply resorts to lyricism flatly deploring the effects of civil war. Psyhi Vathia, in its inability to decide what it wants to be or how it should say what it wants to say, loses any real interest in politics as well and it is finally reduced to a rather naive statement of patriotism depriving the audience of a thorough and credible insight at the machinations that brought this war. A few good battle scenes and beautiful woods cinematography do not save the day.

The movie tries to portray all the suffering and pain that a civil war brings. At times the emotions are high, especially in after-battle scenes. The director tries to focus on both parties (maybe with a a little left-party bias).. Overall the movie succeeds in creating an engaging atmosphere although some scenes seem a bit rushed and unclear (towards the end).

Definitely worth watching,

There were some brilliant scenes in the movie, especially some of the scenes when the two brothers meet and the scene in the snow and the tent. Really captured the pain of a civil war.

As Guns and Roses say: what's so civil about war anyway?

My biggest gripe about the film was that it seemed to paint the communist guerrillas in much more favorable light than they deserved. Americans come across as the nasty guys. Very stereotype. Anyone wonder what Greece would have been like if the Soviets did come to the guerrilla's rescue (as some of the characters long)?

A film worth watching.