एडी हाल्स्टेड को अपने मृत पिता की संपत्ति मिलती है,वह पियर्सन के नशीले पदार्थों के संचालन में अपनी भूमिका से अनभिज्ञ है, अपराध का कोई अनुभव नहीं होने के बावजूद, उसे ऑपरेशन संभालना होगा या सं... सभी पढ़ेंएडी हाल्स्टेड को अपने मृत पिता की संपत्ति मिलती है,वह पियर्सन के नशीले पदार्थों के संचालन में अपनी भूमिका से अनभिज्ञ है, अपराध का कोई अनुभव नहीं होने के बावजूद, उसे ऑपरेशन संभालना होगा या संपत्ति खोनी होगी.एडी हाल्स्टेड को अपने मृत पिता की संपत्ति मिलती है,वह पियर्सन के नशीले पदार्थों के संचालन में अपनी भूमिका से अनभिज्ञ है, अपराध का कोई अनुभव नहीं होने के बावजूद, उसे ऑपरेशन संभालना होगा या संपत्ति खोनी होगी.
- 1 प्राइमटाइम एमी जीते
- 2 जीत और कुल 29 नामांकन
एपिसोड ब्राउज़ करें
सारांश
Reviewers say 'The Gentlemen' series by Guy Ritchie impresses with its stylish storytelling and British eccentricity. The ensemble cast, including Theo James and Ray Winstone, delivers standout performances. The show boasts rich narratives, sharp dialogue, and complex characters. Visually, it excels with lush cinematography and meticulous costumes. However, some find pacing uneven and plotlines convoluted, occasionally prioritizing style over substance. Despite these issues, it remains an enjoyable and unique crime drama.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
If that makes any sense. What I'm trying to say while pointing Aristotle's quote into a mirror, is that this is worth watching simply for all of the outstanding individual performances. There are many other reasons to tune in, but the acting clinic on parade here is a lot of fun.
The Parts:
#1 - The Story
Of course, this story began with the film but has only a very tangential relationship with that work. Every episode has a beginning, middle, and an end, as well as a cliffhanger or something else to propel viewers onward. As with his movies, some of the stories worked for me, others didn't. Some of the conflicts were just way too facile with their resolutions. Eddie was pushed into way too many predicaments as he tried to extract his family from the business, accepting too many dangerous assignments for reasons not adequately explained, not to me.
#2 - The Dialogue
Ritchie seems to have developed his own form of dialogue in which street toughs and lowlifes converse with a sort of modern day Shakespearean banter, well above the vernacular of the average dirtbag, whether in real life or in other movies. While Tarantino was propelled into stardom for the way in which some of his characters lapse into long soliloquys, whether on their own or in a group, Ritchie's creations throw around a lot of word-a-day calendar vocabulary in their speechifying. It comes off affected at times, but more often than not his dialogue is a lot of fun.
#3 - The Characters
Bringing fun-as-hell characters to life on the screen is definitely Ritchie's strong point, or one of them. Eddie, Susie, Jimmy, Bobby, and Geoff could all walk away from this and carry their own series. It helps to have such talented actors reading you lines, and it definitely is important for actors to have great material to spin into the roles they help to create.
Compared to about 99% of what is out there in TV and movie land, this series was positively brilliant. Period.
The Parts:
#1 - The Story
Of course, this story began with the film but has only a very tangential relationship with that work. Every episode has a beginning, middle, and an end, as well as a cliffhanger or something else to propel viewers onward. As with his movies, some of the stories worked for me, others didn't. Some of the conflicts were just way too facile with their resolutions. Eddie was pushed into way too many predicaments as he tried to extract his family from the business, accepting too many dangerous assignments for reasons not adequately explained, not to me.
#2 - The Dialogue
Ritchie seems to have developed his own form of dialogue in which street toughs and lowlifes converse with a sort of modern day Shakespearean banter, well above the vernacular of the average dirtbag, whether in real life or in other movies. While Tarantino was propelled into stardom for the way in which some of his characters lapse into long soliloquys, whether on their own or in a group, Ritchie's creations throw around a lot of word-a-day calendar vocabulary in their speechifying. It comes off affected at times, but more often than not his dialogue is a lot of fun.
#3 - The Characters
Bringing fun-as-hell characters to life on the screen is definitely Ritchie's strong point, or one of them. Eddie, Susie, Jimmy, Bobby, and Geoff could all walk away from this and carry their own series. It helps to have such talented actors reading you lines, and it definitely is important for actors to have great material to spin into the roles they help to create.
Compared to about 99% of what is out there in TV and movie land, this series was positively brilliant. Period.
I thoroughly enjoyed this series, although I acknowledge that I easily cleared two hurdles that viewers with lower ratings might not:
I loved Guy Ritchie's style and didn't find it getting old on me;
I didn't know about any movie, so I'm seeing these as "fresh" takes from the start.
Every character in this series was fun to get to know and to try to understand. What complexity. What eccentricity along with believable nuance.
Every actor succeeded in pulling off finely crafted individuals that fit perfectly into the sometimes off-the-wall plot.
They lure viewers in, which is a great reason to keep going.
Another great reason, of course, is that plot.
What a ride!
Every character in this series was fun to get to know and to try to understand. What complexity. What eccentricity along with believable nuance.
Every actor succeeded in pulling off finely crafted individuals that fit perfectly into the sometimes off-the-wall plot.
They lure viewers in, which is a great reason to keep going.
Another great reason, of course, is that plot.
What a ride!
You can tell Guy Ritchie only wrote (co-wrote) and directed the first two episodes as the show starts off with a crack and runs into a muddy and convoluted plot in episodes 5-7 and a fairly uncreative ending in episode 8.
The show shines with the casting - primarily Kaya Scodelario as Susie Glass. Actually everyone is strong except for Theo James who I thought was miscast and would think he is a poor actor given his track record had it not been for White Lotus Season 2. I don't think he has found his acting niche yet but this isn't it.
There are still Guy Ritchie vibes in the rest of the show after episode 2 and a fun and entertaining cast of characters. Messy plot in the back half and a little uncreative for Ritchie standards but a fun and high energy show.
The show shines with the casting - primarily Kaya Scodelario as Susie Glass. Actually everyone is strong except for Theo James who I thought was miscast and would think he is a poor actor given his track record had it not been for White Lotus Season 2. I don't think he has found his acting niche yet but this isn't it.
There are still Guy Ritchie vibes in the rest of the show after episode 2 and a fun and entertaining cast of characters. Messy plot in the back half and a little uncreative for Ritchie standards but a fun and high energy show.
As a big fan of Guy Ritchie and the movie that this was based off, The Gentleman, I've been looking forward to this since I first heard about it, especially when I heard Ritchie was also creating it and even directing episodes. Even though it's not quite as good as the movie it's still very good and absolutely worth your time to watch this. I enjoyed the style of this series. It makes you enjoy every character and actually care about what happens to them. Theo James was terrific as the lead and between his performance in this and The White Lotus last year I hope it leads to even bigger things for him. If you're looking for a new show that is just a fun watch then this is it. I really hope they do several seasons of this because I'm fully invested.
If you like this sort of thing: wild, over the top and sometimes ruthless British blokes with a dark sense of humor, you'll probably watch in one binge sitting.
For myself, I found a lot of new faces, so I didn't know what to expect. The leads are entertaining. Vinnie Jones is a nice addition, as a more laid back, but don't mess with me fellow.
The old English estate setting is great to look at in itself.
Once again, Guy Richie has no problem creating a rich environment, and dialog is cleaver and sharp.
Grab a bottle of wine and enjoy the ride.
Never going to top Lock, Stock, Etc or Snatch, but this is great fun.
Highly recommended.
For myself, I found a lot of new faces, so I didn't know what to expect. The leads are entertaining. Vinnie Jones is a nice addition, as a more laid back, but don't mess with me fellow.
The old English estate setting is great to look at in itself.
Once again, Guy Richie has no problem creating a rich environment, and dialog is cleaver and sharp.
Grab a bottle of wine and enjoy the ride.
Never going to top Lock, Stock, Etc or Snatch, but this is great fun.
Highly recommended.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाDespite playing the younger brother on the show, Theo James is actually a year older than Daniel Ings, who plays the older Freddie.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in The 76th Primetime Emmy Awards (2024)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How many seasons does The Gentlemen have?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
- Is this show a continuation of the film of the same name?
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Quý Ông Thế Giới Ngầm
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- Badminton House, Gloucestershire, इंग्लैंड, यूनाइटेड किंगडम(Halstead Manor exteriors, hallway and stairs)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि50 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें