IMDb रेटिंग
4.9/10
44 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
न्यूयॉर्क शहर में एक हत्या का गवाह रहे एक विरक्त हो चुके जोड़े को गवाह संरक्षण कार्यक्रम के हिस्से के रूप में छोटे शहर व्योमिंग में स्थानांतरित कर दिया जाता है.न्यूयॉर्क शहर में एक हत्या का गवाह रहे एक विरक्त हो चुके जोड़े को गवाह संरक्षण कार्यक्रम के हिस्से के रूप में छोटे शहर व्योमिंग में स्थानांतरित कर दिया जाता है.न्यूयॉर्क शहर में एक हत्या का गवाह रहे एक विरक्त हो चुके जोड़े को गवाह संरक्षण कार्यक्रम के हिस्से के रूप में छोटे शहर व्योमिंग में स्थानांतरित कर दिया जाता है.
- पुरस्कार
- 2 कुल नामांकन
Natalia Klimas-Bober
- Monique Rabelais
- (as Natalia Klimas)
Sándor Técsy
- Anton Forenski
- (as Sandor Tecsy)
Kevin Dotcom Brown
- U.S. Marshal Henderson
- (as Kevin Brown)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I am very disappointed so many people have trashed this movie. There were so many funny jokes made by Hugh Grant and Sarah Jessica Parker; and Hugh Grant's accent and phrases are hysterical. For example, in the beginning the Federal Marshall tells Sarah Jessica Parker she has to make a choice between dying and leaving New York and there is a long pause as they all stare at her and she says, "Hold on I'm thinking." I think the combination of them together was very funny. Also, if you have ever lived in a big city or a very rural area - you can identify with this! I love their interactions with Sam Elliot and Mary Steenburgen. In another scene, Hugh Grant is served a plate of eggs, sausage, bacon, home fries covered in country gravy by Mary Steenburger and she asks him if he needs anything else, and he replies, "Just an angiogram." They are complete opposites. Plus I am sure there are many women out there who can sympathize with Sarah Jessica Parker's character. I recommend giving this movie a chance!!
If you're expecting an original groundbreaking comedy, you're probably going to be disappointed by this film. But if you're looking for a bit of sweet entertainment, it will fit the bill.
The acting was pretty decent, and there were quite a few chuckles throughout the movie. If you're looking for much more than that, you'll probably want to pick another movie. The biggest disadvantage was that the plot was absolutely predictable.
However, I was impressed with the way it showed a couple trying to work through a very serious problem in their relationship. The romance part was fairly believable.
It's not a movie that I'm dying to see again or rushing to go out and buy, but it was an enjoyable way to spend some time. I went to see it with family, and we all more or less enjoyed it.
The acting was pretty decent, and there were quite a few chuckles throughout the movie. If you're looking for much more than that, you'll probably want to pick another movie. The biggest disadvantage was that the plot was absolutely predictable.
However, I was impressed with the way it showed a couple trying to work through a very serious problem in their relationship. The romance part was fairly believable.
It's not a movie that I'm dying to see again or rushing to go out and buy, but it was an enjoyable way to spend some time. I went to see it with family, and we all more or less enjoyed it.
I really did enjoy this movie, it was predictable, yes. But which chick flick isn't? However, I stayed to see how they showed how their "Wyoming" was. It was fairly accurate. The actors dud pretty well were pretty good, we really do have horses, hunt, fish and some of the houses look exactly like that. There were some differences of course. In the larger cities, we don't always leave the cars unlocked but in smaller towns for sure. Friends and family are always allowed to take our truck or car. I say give the movie people a chance, maybe eventually they will film a correct Wyoming. At least this one was actually in the USA. Most of them are filmed in Canada... which looks nothing like the real Wyoming.
I really don't understand why this movie has such a low rating. The people who's been voting must have had sky high expectations? It isn't that bad, really it isn't. I considered if I should see it or not, after seeing the rating 3.6 here at IMDb.com. Of course I was discouraged by it, but I needed a movie in the background this morning while I did some other things, and thought this was perfect, since it didn't need my full attention. But I ended up ignoring my chores, giving the movie my attention anyway. Because it wasn't bad. It was what I expected (even better, considering the rating). A predictable romantic comedy. The chemistry between Hugh Grant and Sarah Jessica Parker wasn't great, but it wasn't lousy either. And Hugh Grant is Hugh Grant, and he used his dry, British humor (which I personally love) as in many other movies. Sarah Jessica Parker did okay in acting too. The movie didn't make me roll on the floor laughing, but it did make me smile a couple of times. And sometimes all you need is a feel-good-movie without any deep conflicts, and with an end you can foresee.
So I really, really, really don't understand why people have been trashing this movie in particular. Give it a chance, at least.
So I really, really, really don't understand why people have been trashing this movie in particular. Give it a chance, at least.
Don't be fooled by most of the reviews here. I can't explain them, but it may have something to do with the fact that some of the jokes in the movie are not immediately perceptible to those who haven't worked/lived in a big city.
I just watched this last night and had a blast! It's not for the quality of the movie itself. In fact, some of the acting is quite bad. But one of the points in going to the movies is to have fun. Movies entertain you. And this one did an exceptional job in that matter!
As a comedy, it is one of the best I've seen in the last couple of years or so. It's a good laugh that is worth a watch.
I just watched this last night and had a blast! It's not for the quality of the movie itself. In fact, some of the acting is quite bad. But one of the points in going to the movies is to have fun. Movies entertain you. And this one did an exceptional job in that matter!
As a comedy, it is one of the best I've seen in the last couple of years or so. It's a good laugh that is worth a watch.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe cabin in Ray that the Morgans stay in is actually owned by Val Kilmer.
- गूफ़(at around 44 mins and 1h 7 mins) The same footage of Paul getting up off the couch and saying goodnight while Meryl lays on the couch is repeated.
- भाव
Meryl Morgan: Actually, I'm a member of PETA. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.
Emma Wheeler: So am I. Except mine's People for Eating Tasty Animals.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटAfter the credits, Meryl Morgan's answering machine is heard once again.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Live from Studio Five: एपिसोड #1.62 (2009)
- साउंडट्रैकFools
Written and Performed by Diane Birch
Courtesy of S-Curve Records
[Played during the first scenes at Meryl's place]
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
Everything New on Hulu in August
Everything New on Hulu in August
There's a whole lot to love about Hulu's streaming offerings this month — get excited for brand-new series premieres and film favorites to watch at home.
- How long is Did You Hear About the Morgans??Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Untitled Hugh Grant/Sarah Jessica Parker Project
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- 325 Chicosa St, Roy, न्यू मैक्सिको, यूएसए(Annette's Cafe)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $5,80,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $2,95,80,087
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $66,16,571
- 20 दिस॰ 2009
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $8,52,80,250
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 43 मि(103 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें