Grrr...

With such a solid cast and crew, it isn't wrong to expect some quality writing, production design, and performances here. The film's key selling point (two people getting stuck in a zoo enclosure with a lion) merely comes across as an unnecessary plot diversion, which neither resolves any core character conflicts nor explains the poorly scripted (and crafted) tail-end. This is not even close to the vintage Suraj Venjaramood you'd love to see in a premise like this. There are a couple of oddly fun one-liners, but 99.8% of attempts at humor fail to evoke even a chuckle. VFX, animatronics, and even capturing a real lion's antics on camera couldn't make the entire "dealing with a lion & a drunkard" scenes any better-those are just difficult to sit through.

I remember laughing more for an atrocious film like Crocodile Love Story than this one - at least, it had fun interventions from Kalabhavan Mani, Prem Kumar, and company. Here, despite the presence of performers like Manju Pillai, Rajesh Madhavan, Ramesh Pisharody, Alancier Ley Lopez, and Malayalam cinema's new-gen master of satire Ratheesh Balakrishnan Poduval, it simply feels like a potpourri of characters. This also contributes to diluting the stakes of the central plot, which lacks any sort of emotional hook. I have always loved seeing Anagha, and she does fine even with the limited character development.

Grrr is a straightforward comedic show with no complex structure or storyline. In the film, a young man who becomes drunk and goes into the lion's cage at the zoo is saved. You will undoubtedly laugh for a long time. But there's no sign of acting prowess. A movie that is typically only seen once. Director obviously tried to add something to the movie. However, everything proved to be a nightmare. Because you can only experience the movie's content if you give it some thought. It might have been seen for some time without any further transgressions. The presence of a lion suggests that something interesting will occur. It is possible to argue that the movie is insufficient even with additions. The direction and the screenplay are both mediocre.

This movie is plain DULL. The songs and the lyrics are worst. The makers should be eaten by lion.

There is zero creativity. The end.

This movie is plain DULL. The songs and the lyrics are worst. The makers should be eaten by lion.

There is zero creativity. There is zero creativity.

This movie is plain DULL. The songs and the lyrics are worst. The makers should be eaten by lion. There is zero creativity. There is zero creativity.

This movie is plain DULL. The songs and the lyrics are worst. The makers should be eaten by lion. This movie is plain DULL. The songs and the lyrics are worst. The makers should be eaten by lion.

I'm not getting how kunjako boben is not concerned with the script. I hole he blindly pick movies. The only good character is done by suraj venjaramud.

I'm not getting how kunjako boben is not concerned with the script. I hole he blindly pick movies. The only good character is done by suraj venjaramud.

I'm not getting how kunjako boben is not concerned with the script. I hole he blindly pick movies. The only good character is done by suraj venjaramud.

I'm not getting how kunjako boben is not concerned with the script. I hole he blindly pick movies. The only good character is done by suraj venjaramud.

Lack of Depth in the Story: While the film is based on an unusual incident, the story lacks depth and feels shallow.

* Flat Comedy: Despite being marketed as a comedy, the humor falls flat in many parts. Most jokes feel forced and fail to elicit laughter from the audience.

* Average Acting: The acting performances from some of the actors are mediocre. They struggle to fully embody their characters.

* Special Effects: The special effects, especially the lion scenes, appear inadequate and out of place.

* Screenplay: The screenplay has several weaknesses, such as unnecessarily long scenes and weak dialogues.

* Direction: The direction lacks a clear vision. The film's pacing is slow, and it fails to move the story forward effectively.

Specific Negative Reviews (Without Watching the Film): * "The story is so unbelievable that it's hard to believe it's based on a true incident." * "The comedy is offensive to the audience. The jokes are not funny at all." * "The acting is so bad that it's painful to watch." * "The special effects are so poor that it seems like a children's film." * "The screenplay has no emotion. It's just a sequence of events." * "The director had no vision for making such a film." If you can provide more information about the film, I can create a more specific and accurate review.

* Have you watched the film?

* What did you like and dislike about the film?

* What kind of films do you prefer?

Based on your feedback, I can tailor a more personalized review.

Other potential negative points: * The film's length might be excessive.

* The background music might seem faded.

* The film's message might not be clearly conveyed.