Minor Premise

It was a really interesting concept with the split personality angle but difficult to grasp the thread of what was happening for much of the film. This would have been fine if you were invested in the characters but they were hard to root for as their motivations just did not seem convincing. I didn't really believe in the protaganists passionate, single minded pursuit of "the work" nor his partner's total commitment to stick by him in the most extreme circumstances. A great example of how to execute this kind of story really well is Shane Carruth's 2004 film 'Primer' and although Minor Premise evoked some aspects of that film it was much less enjoyable, for me.

Minor Premise: In ways a bit like Split because neuro-scientist has split his consciousness into ten different parts, Trouble is he did it deliberately to troubleshoot a memory editing device , the different segments control him for six minutes at a time. Leaving him with blackouts, some his personalities are creative others are violent. This affects his lif and continuing grants as a researcher, his relationships and even his continued existence. The editing is good ar tines especially when he tries to get the maths of his experimental machine to work out. But it can also be confusing as it chops and cuts between timelines. Pay close attention. To this interesting SF tale about memory and consciousness.. Directed by Eric Schultz in his directorial debut. He co-wrote the script alongside Justin Moretto and Thomas Torrey. 7/10.

I'm much more interested in the genre when it trades in big ideas over big effects and Minor Premise delivers this in spades. You've just got to marvel at the creativity involved in conjuring up a scenario where the brain's hemisphere's are split into ten separate personalities in a chess mach against each other. They mine this concept for an effective race against time thriller that makes the most out of it's minimalist setting.

Sathya Sridharan's delivery is on point, but also a little understated, as many of the sub-personalities are never even fully explored. You can only imagine what would happened were the role given to someone like Jim Carrey, and while an over the top performance may have been more impressive, it would likely border on parody.

For such a heady film, it's kind of hard not to overthink the glaring flaws in logic it stumbles through along the way. Sure, such an outlandish premise requires a little willing suspension of disbelief, but one can't help but feel they could have tightened up some of the details. It's not enough to derail the train for me, but if you get hung up on the little things, there's sure to be a couple that rub you the wrong way.

**** "SPOILER / ONLY RELAVENT IF YOU'VE SEEN THE FILM" SECTION****

We're expected to believe each personality accomplishes everything within 6 minutes? One of the personalities buys and installs a security camera, in 6 minutes? It would take longer than that waiting in line at the store. Why didn't they take any precautions to keep the more erratic personalities away from the irreplaceable, life altering equipment? He just leaves the embodiment of anger, prone to smashing things, in a room with his life's work, like there's no alternative? The way they treat having an equation like some sort of secret password/skeleton key? I'm no neuroscientist, but I doubt they're all just one line of algebra away from taping into the inner mechanics of the brain. Honestly, the whole thing is preposterous really, and for the most part, I'm all for it, I just needed to vent a few gripes.

I'm not sure if this film is very, very smart or very, very stupid, which probably says more about me than the film. I will say one thing definitively and that is it's fairly intriguing if you let yourself get into it. The lead actor, and more or less the whole show with one smaller exception, is played by an actor who seemed so familiar to me yet there is nothing in his credits that I have seen. His name is Sathya Sridharan this is a whale of a role for any actor and he mostly pulls it off. This low budget budget film, and it shows now and then, is about a man dealing with 10 aspects of his consciousness as he has separated them from being one entity. Beyond this intricate scenario he changes from one aspect to another every 6 minutes. So we see him jumping from apathy, exuberance, anger, psychosis, etc. He is sometimes at war with himself somewhat like a split personality. While a lot of this is very interesting some of it is not very clear at times particularly the time jumping. He has brought this dilemma on to himself by following in the footsteps of his father who pops up every now and then as well though I'm not so sure how much this character is needed. As an on and off assistant to him in all of this is his very patient ex-girlfriend who is the one exception that I mentioned. This will either be boring, nonsense or intriguing depending upon the individual watching. I suspect that the first choice will be the most common, but for serious sci-fi buffs you probably want to take a peek at this.

I'm not sure what the point of this movie was. I really did not enjoy it. Tedious and seemed much longer than the actual run time. Not sure why so many people found this to be a good movie.