IMDb रेटिंग
6.9/10
2.1 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
इतिहास से लेकर मतदाता दमन के खिलाफ वर्तमान सक्रियता तक, वोटिंग में होने वाले बाधाओं को दर्शाया गया है जो संयुक्त राज्य के ज्यादातर लोग नहीं जानते, और जो नागरिकों के मूल अधिकारों के लिए खतरा ... सभी पढ़ेंइतिहास से लेकर मतदाता दमन के खिलाफ वर्तमान सक्रियता तक, वोटिंग में होने वाले बाधाओं को दर्शाया गया है जो संयुक्त राज्य के ज्यादातर लोग नहीं जानते, और जो नागरिकों के मूल अधिकारों के लिए खतरा है.इतिहास से लेकर मतदाता दमन के खिलाफ वर्तमान सक्रियता तक, वोटिंग में होने वाले बाधाओं को दर्शाया गया है जो संयुक्त राज्य के ज्यादातर लोग नहीं जानते, और जो नागरिकों के मूल अधिकारों के लिए खतरा है.
- 1 प्राइमटाइम एमी के लिए नामांकित
- 6 जीत और कुल 16 नामांकन
Lyndon B. Johnson
- Self
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Obviously there are team sports being played in the reviews. Critics reviewed this perfectly. Although it's about Abraham's, the film did a great job of adding historic, factual info while also sprinkling 1st hand experiences of ppl affected by suppression.
You could argue it's preachy, but it's preachy for a very good reason.
While the presentation isn't too flashy either, this compellingly and coherently breaks down many of the current problems with the voting system in the USA, focusing on (but not always limited to) minority groups.
I learnt a good deal from watching this, and the way it cut back and forth between historical events in the America's past regarding voting rights and what was happening in the present day was really well done.
Great interviews, great editing, and great information. It's a little in terms of visuals and entertainment value, and some people are unfortunately going to remain unswayed by the arguments presented, but I thought it was a very good and extremely relevant documentary that's worth a watch in these trying times.
While the presentation isn't too flashy either, this compellingly and coherently breaks down many of the current problems with the voting system in the USA, focusing on (but not always limited to) minority groups.
I learnt a good deal from watching this, and the way it cut back and forth between historical events in the America's past regarding voting rights and what was happening in the present day was really well done.
Great interviews, great editing, and great information. It's a little in terms of visuals and entertainment value, and some people are unfortunately going to remain unswayed by the arguments presented, but I thought it was a very good and extremely relevant documentary that's worth a watch in these trying times.
"Then you ask yourself, why do we have this architecture of all of these obstacles - voter ID, gerrymandering, purging, poll closures - why do we have all of this if voter fraud is virtually nonexistent? When you ask that question that way, then it leads you down a path where America must look at itself again, the way that it looked at itself when it saw the cataclysm on the Edmund Pettus Bridge." -- Professor Carol Anderson
A documentary that works pretty well as a history lesson of voter suppression in America, covering its founding, Reconstruction, the Jim Crow south, and the Civil Rights movement in ways that are accessible and informative. More importantly, it connects the dots to the present day, leading to the shameful gutting of the Voting Rights Act in the Shelby County v. Holder Supreme Court decision, and its creation of "Jim Crow 2.0" as Carol Anderson put it. I liked how it reminds us of Chief Justice John Roberts' apprenticeship under William Rehnquist, and the latter's role on the front lines of voter suppression in Arizona in the 1960's. I liked how it also reminded us of the genesis of Florida's ban on ex-felons voting (hint: it's racist). The film puts a lot of its focus on Stacey Abrams and her narrow loss in Georgia's 2018 gubernatorial election, one rife with voter suppression and certainly a worthy topic (she's such a fantastic leader!), though I think it sacrifices a few things as a result, such as the disastrous Rucho v. Common Cause gerrymandering decision. It does present the case that change is only possible through sustained effort and protest, and that voting is a critical part of democracy, serving as an effective call to action. Overall, well worth watching, as the fight continues.
A documentary that works pretty well as a history lesson of voter suppression in America, covering its founding, Reconstruction, the Jim Crow south, and the Civil Rights movement in ways that are accessible and informative. More importantly, it connects the dots to the present day, leading to the shameful gutting of the Voting Rights Act in the Shelby County v. Holder Supreme Court decision, and its creation of "Jim Crow 2.0" as Carol Anderson put it. I liked how it reminds us of Chief Justice John Roberts' apprenticeship under William Rehnquist, and the latter's role on the front lines of voter suppression in Arizona in the 1960's. I liked how it also reminded us of the genesis of Florida's ban on ex-felons voting (hint: it's racist). The film puts a lot of its focus on Stacey Abrams and her narrow loss in Georgia's 2018 gubernatorial election, one rife with voter suppression and certainly a worthy topic (she's such a fantastic leader!), though I think it sacrifices a few things as a result, such as the disastrous Rucho v. Common Cause gerrymandering decision. It does present the case that change is only possible through sustained effort and protest, and that voting is a critical part of democracy, serving as an effective call to action. Overall, well worth watching, as the fight continues.
Unfair, undemocratic, biased, discriminatory, immoral, partisan, autocratic, oppressive; with a common denominator the world over - white middle aged and older men, who are the curse of freedom, truth and democracy (obvs. not all of them). They've been around a while, just search for 'A Rotten Borough' online to find out more.
Being able to vote as a legitimate resident in any country should be as easy as going outside and holding up your arm. If your views are then reflected in representatives appointed through proportional representation, you have democracy. Break either of those rules and, as much as you'd like to think otherwise, you're under the control of others and, most likely, through men with the common attributes and characteristics previously alluded to - another one of them being they don't like your right to vote if you're not like them.
Being able to vote as a legitimate resident in any country should be as easy as going outside and holding up your arm. If your views are then reflected in representatives appointed through proportional representation, you have democracy. Break either of those rules and, as much as you'd like to think otherwise, you're under the control of others and, most likely, through men with the common attributes and characteristics previously alluded to - another one of them being they don't like your right to vote if you're not like them.
Just watched "All In: The Fight for Democracy" and it's an excellent recap of the GA gubernatorial election (Stacey Abrams vs. Brian Kemp) and it does a great job of tying current day voter suppression efforts to their historical origins. Check it out! #VoterSuppressionIsReal
क्या आपको पता है
- कनेक्शनReferenced in Late Night with Seth Meyers: Stacey Abrams/David Byrne/Sonny Emory (2020)
- साउंडट्रैकTurn Tables
Written by Janelle Monáe, Nate 'Rocket' Wonder, and George A. Peters II
Performed by Janelle Monáe
Produced by Nate 'Rocket' Wonder and Roman GianArthur Irvin
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Her Şey Dahil: Demokrasi Mücadelesi
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 42 मि(102 min)
- रंग
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें