अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA woman finds romance with a handsome local when she returns home to help her father with the family vineyard.A woman finds romance with a handsome local when she returns home to help her father with the family vineyard.A woman finds romance with a handsome local when she returns home to help her father with the family vineyard.
Austin Highsmith Garces
- Alison
- (as Austin Highsmith)
Michael Anthony Page
- Walter
- (as Mike Page)
Lena Harmon
- Festival Goer
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Kenda Henthorn
- Festival Goer
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
- …
Howard Morey
- Office worker
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Avalon Rayne
- Festival Goer
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
6.5 stars.
Just barely rounds up to a 7. It's somewhat difficult to manage placing this story in the realm of possible for several reasons. The main actor is not straight, so envisioning him as it is already difficult. But that's the reality of Hollywood, once an actor comes out, there's no stuffing themselves back in. Sure, we could say it's no different than trying to believe a straight portraying a non character. So be it. It's all about getting into the romance and enjoying the experience of attraction between two leads, knowing that one of them isn't capable of being that for the other. Ok, like I said, so be it.
Now let's talk about the movie. This story is presented to us in slow motion. I am not kidding. The tempo of conversation is literally turned down to 65%. Every sentence is deliberate, so the 90 minutes of run time is telling a 60 minute story. The story itself is not original in any way. In fact, this is about as unoriginal and monotonous as they come. So what was good about it? It's very relaxing and ASMR-like. This is a good film to unwind and end your hectic day with. Just too slow moving for any entertainment, but it has value in other respects.
Just barely rounds up to a 7. It's somewhat difficult to manage placing this story in the realm of possible for several reasons. The main actor is not straight, so envisioning him as it is already difficult. But that's the reality of Hollywood, once an actor comes out, there's no stuffing themselves back in. Sure, we could say it's no different than trying to believe a straight portraying a non character. So be it. It's all about getting into the romance and enjoying the experience of attraction between two leads, knowing that one of them isn't capable of being that for the other. Ok, like I said, so be it.
Now let's talk about the movie. This story is presented to us in slow motion. I am not kidding. The tempo of conversation is literally turned down to 65%. Every sentence is deliberate, so the 90 minutes of run time is telling a 60 minute story. The story itself is not original in any way. In fact, this is about as unoriginal and monotonous as they come. So what was good about it? It's very relaxing and ASMR-like. This is a good film to unwind and end your hectic day with. Just too slow moving for any entertainment, but it has value in other respects.
Another tale of city girl coming back to her country town and falling for local farmer boy. Nothing original, nothing offensive, nothing relevant.
FILMING: Some views of the countryside are pleasant and inviting, probably the better part of the entire content.
SCRIPT: rather generic and bland, with little or no drama.
CHARACTERS: Cute the little girl, the others have no depth, little vitality, and no endearing qualities.
ACTING: subpar across the field. Jonathan Bennett appears ill-cast in the role of what should have been a rugged countryman. He seems uneasy and comes out unconvincing. Definitely far from his best. Alix Angelis is pretty, but her acting is wooden, almost stereotyped. Half of the time, she is seen on close-ups with goo-goo eyes and a faintly lost expression that, I suppose, was intended to show how smitten she is from the first moment on.
DIRECTING: Probably the cause of all above detracting elements. It must be, as I have seen the same actors do better in other production.
Overall, a production that lives no marks, rather insipid and forgettable.
FILMING: Some views of the countryside are pleasant and inviting, probably the better part of the entire content.
SCRIPT: rather generic and bland, with little or no drama.
CHARACTERS: Cute the little girl, the others have no depth, little vitality, and no endearing qualities.
ACTING: subpar across the field. Jonathan Bennett appears ill-cast in the role of what should have been a rugged countryman. He seems uneasy and comes out unconvincing. Definitely far from his best. Alix Angelis is pretty, but her acting is wooden, almost stereotyped. Half of the time, she is seen on close-ups with goo-goo eyes and a faintly lost expression that, I suppose, was intended to show how smitten she is from the first moment on.
DIRECTING: Probably the cause of all above detracting elements. It must be, as I have seen the same actors do better in other production.
Overall, a production that lives no marks, rather insipid and forgettable.
A man farmer, who is uncle to Curly Sue, falls in love with a robot on an adjacent grape farm. The acting is pretty bad. Main characters are as stiff and interesting as a cardboard box.
First off, Jonathan Bennett being cast as a heterosexual love interest in 2021 (and a "country farmer" role at that) defies logic. And it shows in his acting and his relationship with the female lead.
I actually watched this movie because it sounded troupe-y. And it did not disappoint here. It was incredibly generic...and I loved this. Hence why it is getting four stars. Otherwise it would get one.
Because the acting was incredibly wooden. This is somewhat surprising given the seasoned veterans cast in this one. But wow was it bad. It felt like no one (except the little girl) really wanted to be in this film. The chemistry is non-existent. Any attempted banter falls flat.
My theory is that everyone involved secretly was a little embarrassed in Jonathan Bennett's puzzling role, including Bennett himself. So it just all comes across as awkward.
I actually watched this movie because it sounded troupe-y. And it did not disappoint here. It was incredibly generic...and I loved this. Hence why it is getting four stars. Otherwise it would get one.
Because the acting was incredibly wooden. This is somewhat surprising given the seasoned veterans cast in this one. But wow was it bad. It felt like no one (except the little girl) really wanted to be in this film. The chemistry is non-existent. Any attempted banter falls flat.
My theory is that everyone involved secretly was a little embarrassed in Jonathan Bennett's puzzling role, including Bennett himself. So it just all comes across as awkward.
Nice harlequin vibes for a night on the couch but could not look past her foundation that was only on her face and not on her neck.
Anyway, if you like to know the plot after 5 minutes of watching (which is very nice at times) this is the movie for you!
Anyway, if you like to know the plot after 5 minutes of watching (which is very nice at times) this is the movie for you!
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाOne of the first productions in the U.S. to begin principal photography after the pandemic began. Shooting started in late May 2020.
- गूफ़Grape harvesting does not occur at the same time that daffodils are in bloom.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें