1996 की फिल्म 'ट्विस्टर' का एक अपडेट, जो तूफान का पीछा करने वालों की एक जोड़ी पर केंद्रित है जो एक प्रायोगिक मौसम चेतावनी प्रणाली का परीक्षण करने की कोशिश में अपनी जान जोखिम में डालते हैं.1996 की फिल्म 'ट्विस्टर' का एक अपडेट, जो तूफान का पीछा करने वालों की एक जोड़ी पर केंद्रित है जो एक प्रायोगिक मौसम चेतावनी प्रणाली का परीक्षण करने की कोशिश में अपनी जान जोखिम में डालते हैं.1996 की फिल्म 'ट्विस्टर' का एक अपडेट, जो तूफान का पीछा करने वालों की एक जोड़ी पर केंद्रित है जो एक प्रायोगिक मौसम चेतावनी प्रणाली का परीक्षण करने की कोशिश में अपनी जान जोखिम में डालते हैं.
- पुरस्कार
- 35 कुल नामांकन
सारांश
Reviewers say 'Twisters' is a mixed bag, drawing comparisons to the original 'Twister'. Praise is given for its visual effects, Glen Powell and Daisy Edgar-Jones' performances, and updated technology. However, criticisms include lack of originality, shallow plot, and underdeveloped characters. Action sequences and special effects are well-received, but the film's pacing and lead chemistry receive varied feedback. Despite its flaws, 'Twisters' is considered an entertaining, though not entirely satisfying, experience.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Recently saw the 90s version with the same title starring Hunt & Paxton which was an epic disaster thriller. It was better than this one in every sense be it casting, acting, emotional connect or gravity & intensity of scenes. One thing though seemed to have improved is the visual effects and why not, it's been 30 years since the previous one got released. It's the least they could have done.
Kate, a former tornado chaser is lured back to study a series of tornados expected to hit Oklahoma. Still haunted by a devastating encounter with a tornado during her college years, she crosses paths with fearless Tyler Owens, a modern day tornado chaser cum blogger and his awesome team. In 1996 version they had this alert system called Dorothy which was supposed to track the nature of the tornado. In this film they go next level to mitigate the tornado itself.
Daisy Edgar Jones looks great but disappoints with her portrayal of Kate. Her performance lacked the vigor and magnitude that Hunt's character had. Glen Powell carries the whole movie with his ever-charming role. Though this movie lacked the thrill that the other Twister had, maybe because of the better cast involved in the earlier installment, current version excels in the visual department. Those Tornados looked realistically awesome on the big screen.
Kate, a former tornado chaser is lured back to study a series of tornados expected to hit Oklahoma. Still haunted by a devastating encounter with a tornado during her college years, she crosses paths with fearless Tyler Owens, a modern day tornado chaser cum blogger and his awesome team. In 1996 version they had this alert system called Dorothy which was supposed to track the nature of the tornado. In this film they go next level to mitigate the tornado itself.
Daisy Edgar Jones looks great but disappoints with her portrayal of Kate. Her performance lacked the vigor and magnitude that Hunt's character had. Glen Powell carries the whole movie with his ever-charming role. Though this movie lacked the thrill that the other Twister had, maybe because of the better cast involved in the earlier installment, current version excels in the visual department. Those Tornados looked realistically awesome on the big screen.
Twisters is certainly well made with a talented core cast. It is far from a bad film, but I found the story to be familiar and predictable as far as disaster films go.
I was happy to settle into something fun and entertaining; I don't think my expectations were too high, but I think Twisters was missing tension, which is a vital part of a film like this. At no point did I feel any of the central cast of characters were under real threat as they bounced between set piece stunts.
Glen Powell and Daisy Edgar-Jones are very watchable in the leads and Anthony Ramos does well to give dimensions to a difficult role. There are however, simply too many peripheral characters.
A large portion of the film's runtime focusses on the relationship between the two leads and, aside from Anthony Ramos, there is no time left to flesh out the rest of the supporting cast, who operate largely as comic relief.
I was happy to settle into something fun and entertaining; I don't think my expectations were too high, but I think Twisters was missing tension, which is a vital part of a film like this. At no point did I feel any of the central cast of characters were under real threat as they bounced between set piece stunts.
Glen Powell and Daisy Edgar-Jones are very watchable in the leads and Anthony Ramos does well to give dimensions to a difficult role. There are however, simply too many peripheral characters.
A large portion of the film's runtime focusses on the relationship between the two leads and, aside from Anthony Ramos, there is no time left to flesh out the rest of the supporting cast, who operate largely as comic relief.
Nowhere near as good as the original. Why did they feel the need to remake this? Why can't studios come up with their own new ideas instead of remaking past great movies? What has happened to Hollywood? Where has creativity gone to? It's like they fired or all the best creators quit in Hollywood. I just don't get it. Why are so many movies so horrible today? It's so sad what's been going on lately.
I would highly recommend just watching the original again instead of this mess. The visuals are OK (sometimes), but the original's effects were really good as well, and that was decades ago. The acting and story was subpar at best.
2 out of 10 - save yourself some money and watch the original instead.
I would highly recommend just watching the original again instead of this mess. The visuals are OK (sometimes), but the original's effects were really good as well, and that was decades ago. The acting and story was subpar at best.
2 out of 10 - save yourself some money and watch the original instead.
Twister is an almost three decades older movie yet it has unquestionably superior cinematography, editing, sound editing, surround sound mixing, score and soundtrack. It also has much more creative and visually memorable tornado sequences.
Does Twisters have higher resolution CGI? Yes, the CGI is higher resolution but it's not used right and the quality has barely improved since the one decade older tornado movie "Into The Storm".
There is zero mention of climate change and the human causes of more extreme weather.
There's a rodeo sequence (really?) that could have easily been replaced with some other activity like monster truck show or whatever.
They could have made the tornadoes more dark, ominous and violent like in Twister. It also lacks thrilling shots of crazy debris almost hitting the characters.
The could have made it suspenseful and less predictable by adding and killing off some well developed and likable characters.
High frame rate 3D would have been the appropriate choice for an action movie like this, but they cheaped out..
The budget of Twisters is double the budget of Twister. Unbelievable.
You can clearly tell that it was directed by someone who has no talent or experience with directing action.
Twisters is not a sequel to Twister. It's a pointless re-imagining of Twister.
There would have been a chance for some cinematic magic again if they hired the right people to make a sequel to Twister: Director: James Cameron or Jan De Bont Writers: David Koepp and Anne-Marie Martin.
Does Twisters have higher resolution CGI? Yes, the CGI is higher resolution but it's not used right and the quality has barely improved since the one decade older tornado movie "Into The Storm".
There is zero mention of climate change and the human causes of more extreme weather.
There's a rodeo sequence (really?) that could have easily been replaced with some other activity like monster truck show or whatever.
They could have made the tornadoes more dark, ominous and violent like in Twister. It also lacks thrilling shots of crazy debris almost hitting the characters.
The could have made it suspenseful and less predictable by adding and killing off some well developed and likable characters.
High frame rate 3D would have been the appropriate choice for an action movie like this, but they cheaped out..
The budget of Twisters is double the budget of Twister. Unbelievable.
You can clearly tell that it was directed by someone who has no talent or experience with directing action.
Twisters is not a sequel to Twister. It's a pointless re-imagining of Twister.
There would have been a chance for some cinematic magic again if they hired the right people to make a sequel to Twister: Director: James Cameron or Jan De Bont Writers: David Koepp and Anne-Marie Martin.
So the graphics and visuals are outstanding! It looks like devastation is actually happening. Some of the scenes looking down on the towns were cool but the scenes in the air were incredibly detailed and beautiful. Beyond that I didn't care for it. I wanted to love it but just couldn't . I didn't care or root for any character. I wanted them to all be sucked up into the tornado! There was on scene, early in the movie , that disposed of a character that was awesome. All the performances were hackneyed and just trying to hard. Save your money and wait for it to come on TV or your favorite streaming service.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाJames Paxton: The son of Bill Paxton, appears during the rodeo scene as the angry hotel guest.
- गूफ़In the movie, tornadoes kept popping up and catching crowds unaware.
In Oklahoma TV stations compete aggressively to offer the best severe weather coverage. When conditions are right for potential severe each station would have at least three - if not more - teams of trained spotters deployed, a helicopter for each station, and multiple forms of advanced radar to track storms.
While there are a number of amateur, academic and even weather-tourism spotters around, the majority of spotters would be affiliated with television stations, and citizens know to be following weather reports, resulting in significant advanced notice of approaching storms.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटThe Warner Bros and Amblin Entertainment logos have stormclouds in the background.
- साउंडट्रैकSalio el sol
Written by Paul Irizarry, William Rivera, and Armando Rosario
Performed by Don Omar
Courtesy of Machete Music / VI Music
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Twisters?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $15,50,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $26,77,62,265
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $8,12,51,415
- 21 जुल॰ 2024
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $37,22,62,265
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 2 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें