Nuevo orden

Michel Franco's NEW ORDER assaults the viewer, and that's not completely 'out of order' for a movie about a Mexican revolution. Unfortunately, Franco mostly delivers body blows with little attention given to feed the heads of his audience.

The initial scenes of the underclass trying to overthrow the bourgeoisie (at a rich wedding, no less) have a certain kick. Sadly, Franco (who also wrote) does very little with that advantage. The wedding family is decently sketched out, but, the characters aren't used very well once the siege fully takes hold. They, like the Mexican people as a whole, become pawns in Franco's rage game.

What gives the opening at the wedding it's effectiveness is that you have come to know them as individuals (Naian Gonzalez Norvind is particularly good as the Bride), but, by the end (actually, significantly earlier), they are just part of the bloody landscape. The various 'sides' are murkily drawn. Whatever political thoughts Franco might have are negligible, if not downright cynical. There is no sign of wit, little dramatic tension and a lack of humanity. The final act should have been devastating, but instead just becomes another nasty set-piece. In a movie full of violence, abuse and torture, Franco's biggest offense is that he has nothing to say.

Despite the title and in-your-face political overtones, "New Order" doesn't really say anything much about class struggle, conflict, or wealth distribution with any specificity or insight. It just takes the ruthless divide between the haves and the have-nots in Mexico (I totally agree with criticisms that whatever it does try to say is shown from the point of view of the 1%) and uses it as a pretext to showcase expert craft in creating tension and bathing the screen in blood. I know that it seems like it has something political to say, but aside from a kind of undeveloped (and generally cheap) cynicism about the corruption of the ruling elites (kind of undermined by zero development of the oppressed), this is just a taut, expertly directed thriller that happens to be set during a fictional uprising and coup. The sights of Mexico's flag waving occasionally onscreen are part of the exploitation of political symbols for what is ultimately an entertaining, tense B-movie thriller, with stylistic flourishes of Michael Haneke. If you watch it with that in mind, you can admire its craft.

Countries collapse quickly and this is one of the few movies that express that speed.

Set in Mexico, New Order takes from a wedding day through riot to a military coup and beyond.

The story focuses on the events around one family and their servants. Each subplot deals with the personal and family tragedy that evolves.

Each character reacts to their circumstances and the challenges they face - asking us how we would react faced with similar circumstances. Would we buckle under or would we stand for right.

It is well portrayed and acted but be warned it is graphic. The prison scenes in particular are difficult to watch.

The revolution will be bathed in, uh, green. An odd choice, and one that may excite environmentalists until it becomes quite clear that "New Order" is all about class struggle, and not climate change.

In his visceral dystopian Mexico City tale, director Michel Franco pushes buttons, many, many buttons. Class discrepancy is on crystal clear display via the glamourous wedding reception opening, interrupted by a former employee's desperate plea of funds to save his dying wife. Greeted with faint empathy, some not so well-disguised contempt, and an unsatisfactory handout, he is briskly and discretely ushered off the premises. When the heart of gold princess bride to be gets a whiff of the events, she bolts the mansion to save the day. The disrupted nuptial festivities is soon the least of the elites' niggling problems, as revolutionaries storm the grounds and matters get nasty mighty quick.

Touching similar themes (and cinematic flare) as "Parasite", "New Order" captures the explosive desperation when the haves meet the have-nots on level ground. Digging deep to turn the classes upside down, the focus is on the inherent greed and situational compassion dichotomy lurking in most everyone. It is uncomfortable, disruptive, vicious, anxiety inducing, and bluntly shocking. But unlike "Parasite", there are no moments of levity. No amusing interludes. No time to digest the revolving, evolving struggle. Barely time to take a breath. Many factions are involved, taking turns ruling the day, with corruption and merciless brutality the only common threads. It is a bleak, ninety minute commentary on a world that doesn't seem too far away, creating a provocative, powerful film.

The dystopia of fiction past is unfortunately an unsettling present day proposition in many parts of the world. How it plays out is anyone's guess. Franco's is now on the big screen.

• hipCRANK.

Because so little explanation was offered, the movie leaves you with an impression that it was all about the cruelty show. Or, the creators thought the explanation and conclusions will be obvious - they are not. Pity, cause it feels like a lost, flattened out potential because of a lack of an ending that would offer some answers, even if requiring further reflection.

The last sequence is completely confusing and suddenly the movie ends. I feel this could be (was supposed to be?) a cautionary tale about what happens when anarchy prevails and the exchange of "elites" which always quickly get corrupted - but it was not pointed enough in the movie.