De storm
- 2009
- 1 घं 36 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
6.2/10
3.2 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
1953 की विनाशकारी उत्तर सागर बाढ़ के दौरान, एक युवा महिला और एक नौसेना अधिकारी ने अपने खोए हुए नवजात बेटे की खोज की.1953 की विनाशकारी उत्तर सागर बाढ़ के दौरान, एक युवा महिला और एक नौसेना अधिकारी ने अपने खोए हुए नवजात बेटे की खोज की.1953 की विनाशकारी उत्तर सागर बाढ़ के दौरान, एक युवा महिला और एक नौसेना अधिकारी ने अपने खोए हुए नवजात बेटे की खोज की.
- पुरस्कार
- 4 जीत और कुल 6 नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Really, just read the book. I cannot even begin to compare it to this film. Bad acting, bad lines, wrong accents, and a thousand things missing in (and different to) the storyline.
The book catches the feelings and circumstances of main character Julia so well, you'll actually start feeling the same way she does and will want to pursue her goal of finding her baby even beyond the very end. The true tragedy and injustice of her situation will still hold you in it's grasp for a long time after finishing the book.
By the by, also there is more attention to the flooding and it's consequences to the people living there.
(Book is called '1953' by Rik Launspach)
The book catches the feelings and circumstances of main character Julia so well, you'll actually start feeling the same way she does and will want to pursue her goal of finding her baby even beyond the very end. The true tragedy and injustice of her situation will still hold you in it's grasp for a long time after finishing the book.
By the by, also there is more attention to the flooding and it's consequences to the people living there.
(Book is called '1953' by Rik Launspach)
A real-world tragedy deserves a respectful recounting of events. But this movie opted to reïmagine the dramatic Christmas flood of 1953 in an absurd fictional storyline where the plot and the characters are so shallow you start wondering what the problem is. De Storm fails as a historical film, fails as a drama and fails as a thriller.
The film promotes the dated idea that "a woman needs a man no matter how strong she is". Additionally, it praises idiotic actions of stupidity as "heroic rescue attempts". None of the actors managed to deliver their lines with any level of truth. And I would not have been able to muster the two stars I rated it if the special effects hadn't been this decent.
De Storm, in essence, is an insult to the victims of the flood and a disgrace to Dutch filmmaking. Tedious, disastrously dated and offending.
The film promotes the dated idea that "a woman needs a man no matter how strong she is". Additionally, it praises idiotic actions of stupidity as "heroic rescue attempts". None of the actors managed to deliver their lines with any level of truth. And I would not have been able to muster the two stars I rated it if the special effects hadn't been this decent.
De Storm, in essence, is an insult to the victims of the flood and a disgrace to Dutch filmmaking. Tedious, disastrously dated and offending.
I might be a bit prejudiced, because I am from The Netherlands, where this all happened. I've seen this movie this weekend, I was overwhelmed by its reality. I didn't see it all happen, but some folks in the theater did, and they were crying about all memories coming back. This means, in my humble opinion, that the movie is very realistic, even with a budget so low, game-studios can't make a decent game with this amount of money. I guess that the people in New Orleans also need to see this movie, so they know why the Dutch are now helping with their struggle against water. Watch this movie, it might be an Oscar-winner! Also keep checking out Dutch movies, some of them are real gems. Try to watch movies like TBS, Van God Los and Lek. These are some of the best Dutch movies. And of course, Zwartboek, Blackbook(by Paul Verhoeven!)!
If you had red the book, you do not want to watch this film. It is a huge disappointment in comparing to the detailed description of the book. I doesn't come close to the (much better) storylines and the feeling they want to bring over. Overall bad acting, no emotions noticeable, very very fast told, unbelievable how they made such a good book to such a horrible movie.
56 years after the devastating 'big flood' of 1953 the tragedy finally makes it to to the big screen. After a wait this long it's even more a shame that such a big event in Dutch history turned out to be such a disappointing movie. Where other movies, like for instance Titanic, successfully use a personal drama as a metaphor for the bigger picture, 'De Storm' gets lost in a totally unrealistic and very one dimensional story about a woman losing her baby. The movie ends up almost ignoring the tragedy all those other thousands of people where facing during this flood. The characters in this movie aren't properly introduced so as a spectator you feel no connection at all with the leading roles. The dialogs are very poor and the acting, especially from leading lady Sylvia Hoeks, is a disgrace!!!
Just do yourself a favor and avoid this movie
Just do yourself a favor and avoid this movie
क्या आपको पता है
- गूफ़The flood happened in February 1953, during mid-winter, when the water was a few degrees above freezing, but the main characters spend a considerable amount of time in the water without developing hypothermia.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in De wereld draait door: एपिसोड #5.9 (2009)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is The Storm?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- €63,00,000(अनुमानित)
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $69,31,925
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 36 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें