IMDb रेटिंग
4.2/10
2.8 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
दिवंगत संस्थापक और टेक टाइटन फिनले हार्ट के प्रति उनकी भक्ति से जुड़े, पांच लोगों को उनके सबसे गुप्त आविष्कार को बंद करने के लिए एक साथ काम करना चाहिए, एक ऐसी मशीन जो या तो मानव जाति की समस्... सभी पढ़ेंदिवंगत संस्थापक और टेक टाइटन फिनले हार्ट के प्रति उनकी भक्ति से जुड़े, पांच लोगों को उनके सबसे गुप्त आविष्कार को बंद करने के लिए एक साथ काम करना चाहिए, एक ऐसी मशीन जो या तो मानव जाति की समस्याओं का समाधान है या पृथ्वी पर जीवन का अंत है.दिवंगत संस्थापक और टेक टाइटन फिनले हार्ट के प्रति उनकी भक्ति से जुड़े, पांच लोगों को उनके सबसे गुप्त आविष्कार को बंद करने के लिए एक साथ काम करना चाहिए, एक ऐसी मशीन जो या तो मानव जाति की समस्याओं का समाधान है या पृथ्वी पर जीवन का अंत है.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I did find the concept interesting, and I felt that the acting was reasonably good. Sadly, the things I hate on every Zoom, FaceTime, Teams, or other virtual meeting existed here. If I had been able to mute certain participants at certain times, I may have made it through the movie, but the quiet clacking drove me nuts. I had to tap out.
The rest of the elements brought on by the pandemic existed as well. The isolation, the loss of "safety in numbers," the inability to respond to emergencies because you're all in very different locations, and the constant intrusion into our lives of cameras were all highlighted in the film.
The rest of the elements brought on by the pandemic existed as well. The isolation, the loss of "safety in numbers," the inability to respond to emergencies because you're all in very different locations, and the constant intrusion into our lives of cameras were all highlighted in the film.
Academy Award winner? Absolutely not. But I do not understand why all of the hatred with this film.
It was a challenge to make this movie during the COVID-19 pandemic, so that alone is a type of cinematic breakthrough and the film and directorial/production staff should get a positive acknowledgement for trying something different.
Is the plot line a bit sloppy? Absolutely. Tricky to follow at times? Yup. But movies are supposed to be a form of escapism. This qualifies as that. Different type of story with a unique production value and let's not forget Sir Anthony Hopkins....always a pleasure.
It was a challenge to make this movie during the COVID-19 pandemic, so that alone is a type of cinematic breakthrough and the film and directorial/production staff should get a positive acknowledgement for trying something different.
Is the plot line a bit sloppy? Absolutely. Tricky to follow at times? Yup. But movies are supposed to be a form of escapism. This qualifies as that. Different type of story with a unique production value and let's not forget Sir Anthony Hopkins....always a pleasure.
Starts off with a long, boring philosophical soliloquy by Anthony Hopkins. Once that tedium is over the movie begins and gains a little traction with 5 people being summoned to a critical conference call, each taking it from their home. We learn that they are being asked to sign off on finalizing a highly secret and scary futuristic machine. With that little bit of interesting dilemma, the movie showed promise. But it goes downhill in nearly every respect. Featuring Anthony Hopkins, I figured it had to be good. Five loosely connected individuals all of whom had a close relationship with a tech genius (Hopkins) who recently died. Quickly we learn that they are brought together to provide the go-ahead of a cutting edge device that can lead to teleportation. The project poses risks to the continued survival of the Earth. But it's not clear if turning it on fully or not will be the trigger for a cataclysmic doomsday. Meanwhile there are strange happenings during the call and we suspect there is a 6th menacing participant. The whole movie occurs as part of a few one-on-one video calls and the majority of the movie takes place on a video conference and the audience gets views of covert texting or calling discretely between participants on the video . This novel style is the only "edge" of interest. The movie never really pulls together, and the cutting edge secret project is barely discussed. It does wrap up, but it makes little sense. Not only does the main conference call gets old fast, but the side communications often add no value whatsoever. The sets are idiotic. Even though each person was among the closest business associate with the dead top 5 tech billionaire, they all appear (except for the son that moved into the billionaire home) to have homes that are nice but not "high end." It's as if while the billionaire makes a $100+ million a year,, his closest righthands make a few hundred thousand.a year. Not likely!
This movie was so awful I really have nothing to say. I am dumbfounded that Hopkins was in this and I can only assume he did this as a favor for someone. Probably the worst movie I've ever seen.
I cracked about to submit this at the "Does this contain spoilers" button... The script was so awful there's really no spoilers that could be given. There's basically no plot, no suspense, no surprises, no twists, just 90 minutes of nothingness. So no, it does not contain spoilers lol. For the love of god don't waste your time like I did. Find another movie.
I cracked about to submit this at the "Does this contain spoilers" button... The script was so awful there's really no spoilers that could be given. There's basically no plot, no suspense, no surprises, no twists, just 90 minutes of nothingness. So no, it does not contain spoilers lol. For the love of god don't waste your time like I did. Find another movie.
A movie made with "Zero Contact" between the actors. The first (and hopefully last) Covid19-movie. This is not a movie, this is a replay of saved internet zoom sessions with so called actors which do their trick before their laptop camera (or something). It gets annoying within 10 minutes. One starts to ask "What am I viewing?" Then at some point I called it a day, waste of time to watch. An experiment gone bad (i'm referring to the movie, not the story which is basically near absent). To summarize: please skip this one, not worth any attention.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाJamie Schultz, played by Lilly Krug, is the daughter of Veronica Schultz (Veronica Ferres). Off-screen, Lilly is in fact Veronica's daughter.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Zero Contact?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 37 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें