Abduction

... but all you would need is the DVD box for that, right? I bought my copy on eBay; five bucks down the drain! Thank you to the seller who gave me free shipping. My questions: Did the director read the script? WAS there a script? Was the editor on hallucinogenics while working? Is John Orrichio someone who inherited $100,000 and spent at least half of it asking people in his neighborhood if they wanted to be in a movie? Does he have another relative with a failing breast augmentation clinic who offered to get him laid in return for some free advertising? Was that surgeon on the same hallucinogenics as the editor? "Rocky Horror" was a low-budget classic. What is the opposite of classic? This is it.

I've watched a couple thousand movies in my lifetime, enjoying even the cheesy movies that are churned out.

This movie, though, is one of the few movies to ever leave a lasting impression and not in the good way. There's the poor cinematography, poor lighting, and plot that could have been good, if not for the horrific acting. Abduction has excellent cover art and that is where the excellence ends. The movie is so dull, I had trouble staying focused within the first ten minutes of it beginning. The acting is horrendous, wooden, and it seems as if lines were thrown in, just to help ease the pain of the awkward pauses of conversations. There are gratuitous scenes of bound and topless girls, but if that's what you want, you're much better off finding other stuff on the internet.

This movie is just so, so bad I'm having difficulty finding words to describe it. There are better low-budget films out there!

OK .. watched this on netflix last night - so did not have to spend extra money on this junk.

Made with little budget and devoid of any production value, the movie goes on for a little under two hours, often without purpose and always with poor acting.

In fact the acting is so bad, that it is worse than a porn movie.

The director tried to spice things up with some T&A. But the scenes had no real sex appeal as the women's faces were mostly covered in a hood. Actually not sure if the hood thing was a blessing in disguise. Most of the women who showed skin in this flick were by and large unattractive.

An earlier review mentioned that this is John Orrichio's best film. That may very well be.

But that speaks volumes of John Orrichio's other efforts.

Are you kidding me? This movie got distribution? If it's not the worse movie ever made it's certainly in the top three. And these people leaving positive reviews? are they serious? Or just family members that acted in the movie. Poor writing. Must be the worst i've ever heard. The lighting looks like it was done by a ten year old. The directing was done by a 5 year old, the acting couldn't be worse if they were actually trying to be the worst movie ever made. I feel sorry for everyone who had to sit thru this movie. Are you getting the point here? it's awful. Terrible. Lousy. Can you see that i was mad paying for it? It's a student film! And a BAD student film. Good God.

Alright so, I have come to the unfortunate, realistic conclusion that as of fifteen minutes ago, myself and my roommate have officially lost and will never be able to gain the- what? almost two hours of our life we had lost watching this atrociously filmed movie. I agree with everyone's negative comments, such as, not being able to believe that it was able to be filmed and both release. Or, about how they definitely put way more effort into the title cover rather than focusing realistically on the story and plot. There's absolutely no way this could ever happen, and be carried out successfully. I wonder how many individuals have this on Blue Ray? Not many I bet. And what the hell was up with Bella breast feeding a bloody stuffed bear? All I can say is that I'm kind of happy I wasn't on any source of hard core drugs use or else I think I would have had the trip of my life if I haven't already trying to figure out this crazy movie.