इंतज़ार खत्म हुआ, अमरीका -- रॉन बर्गंडी लौट आया है! अपनी नौकरी खोने के बाद, रॉन अपना समाचार दल फिर जुटाता है और एक नए प्रतिद्वंदी का सामना करता इस हास्य फ़िल्म में, जिसे समालोचक "साल की सबसे... सभी पढ़ेंइंतज़ार खत्म हुआ, अमरीका -- रॉन बर्गंडी लौट आया है! अपनी नौकरी खोने के बाद, रॉन अपना समाचार दल फिर जुटाता है और एक नए प्रतिद्वंदी का सामना करता इस हास्य फ़िल्म में, जिसे समालोचक "साल की सबसे मज़ेदार फ़िल्म" कहते हैं!*रिचर्ड रोपर, शिकागो सन टाइम्सइंतज़ार खत्म हुआ, अमरीका -- रॉन बर्गंडी लौट आया है! अपनी नौकरी खोने के बाद, रॉन अपना समाचार दल फिर जुटाता है और एक नए प्रतिद्वंदी का सामना करता इस हास्य फ़िल्म में, जिसे समालोचक "साल की सबसे मज़ेदार फ़िल्म" कहते हैं!*रिचर्ड रोपर, शिकागो सन टाइम्स
- पुरस्कार
- 1 जीत और कुल 23 नामांकन
- Narrator
- (वॉइस)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Will Ferrell remains a delight as Ron Burgundy. His exaggerated delivery continues to make every single line of dialogue even funnier and since he's once again aided by David Koechner, Paul Rudd, and Steve Carell, the absurdity continues to be the film's greatest strength. The way each of them is introduced is hilarious with each scenario being the ideal fit for the characters.
Adam McKay's direction has obviously improved thanks to all the films he's done between making these two. The best example of this is the news fight which is a lot bigger in the amount of stars who are involved as well as how the action is staged and serenaded. The plot is just as threadbare as last time and like last time, it's stitched together about as well as it could be.
It comes as no surprise that there has been clamor for a sequel- the only issue is that Paramount had strong misgivings about making one. The box office wasn't strong for the first film, and farce comedies don't generally perform well. It's wonderful that this did get made, however. Not only does it satisfy fans of the first film, but it contains enough fresh material and biting sarcasm to go around. It may not be as crisp as the first, and it contains a few awkward moments, but overall, it deserves kudos for continuing to take risks, and I laughed out loud multiple times.
Summarizing the plot should be rather straightforward. The blustering Ron Burgundy (Farrell) has now married the daring anchorwoman from the first film, Veronica Corningstone (Applegate), with whom he has fathered young Walter. Life is beautiful for them until Mack Tannen (Harrison Ford) decides to retire at the network and makes Veronica, not Ron, the lead nightly anchor. Ron can't handle it, leaves the network, leaves Veronica & Walter, and ends up back in San Diego, drunk in front of Sea World crowds. Luckily for him, he meets a recruiter looking to start a 24 hour news network in New York City. The idea sounds ludicrous to Ron, but perfectly normal and sane to us.
Aside from the jokes and scenarios you can imagine after seeing the first film, the sequel offers a biting satire of today's version of the "news". With news networks on all the time, it's necessary to fill that space with CONTENT. How do these networks acquire this content? Is it possible that the content isn't always 'newsworthy'? Is it possible the boundaries of acceptable news stories have stretched a tad over the years? Answers to all questions are a resounding yes. The fact that news and news anchors are now trusted less by the public are part of the reason that these two films exist, and that the farce is so resonant. It's an unfortunate but true part of our society.
Thankfully, "Anchorman 2″ understands the folly that is a good portion of news today. By showcasing Ron Burgundy on a screen surrounded by multiple talking heads, with headlines running across the top and bottom of the screen, we can clearly see how crowded news delivery is today. Creating a scene with Brick Tamland (Carell) going postal in front of a green screen points out the hilarity that is broadcast meteorology. After all, do we need high- tech graphics to tell us what weather is coming our way? The whole thing is silly, really, which is most likely the reason why these films work so well.
If there are downsides to having this much fun at the theater, it's the occasional overkill. Farce is susceptible to such things, and at nearly two hours, the film occasionally runs into that. The subplot involving Ron going blind and living in exile could have been skipped. Also unnecessary are the oddly repetitive and off- putting actions of Champ Kind (Koechner), illustrating the need for a more well-rounded character (or perhaps actor? This film illustrates why Koechner hasn't been nearly as successful as his comrades). Poor Christina Applegate doesn't have much to do this time around except react to what Will Ferrell's character does to her, and the attempt to give Meagan Good's producer a meaty role falls a bit short.
For its' minor drawbacks, "Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues" is still the year's funniest film. It's also an obvious achievement, not only to get these actors together again, but to give us a film that is worthy of our attention, all while inventing a few new laughs and trying its' hand at social commentary. If there is another sequel, I'm not sure there is anything left to comment on. We know the 'news' is no longer news, and so we, the audience, have to choose what we consume. It's a laborious task- perhaps one of the reasons why so many flock to The Onion, 'The Daily Show', and for all intents and purposes, 'Anchorman' films.
The premise is simple - it's now the 80s and Ron and the gang are in New York to start the first 24-hour-news network (CNN, or 'GNN' in the film - this provides some decent satire), and since it's the 80s, they have to progress with the times, including having a female boss (who's also black). The eight guest-star cameo's - don't worry, I won't ruin the surprise - for the news team battle are pretty funny and will have you going "is that really ___?!"
That's my one issue with the film - it's a little long. Some scenes - such as the shark and the above-mentioned "battle" - go for longer than necessary and probably make it about 15min too long, clocking in at almost two hours. Also, was Josh Lawson the best choice as an Aussie to play a Rupert Murdoch-like character? But it's made up for by some truly laugh-out-loud moments, from finding out what they've all been up to since the first film and then some great sight gags and truly absurd moments.
The first film was very close to comedic perfection; it had everything that was needed and much like any film that you thoroughly enjoy you want to see more, but in the back of your mind you don't want the film to become tainted.
And although this film has its droves of fans, for me it was incredibly disappointing. They took it too far. The stupidity in the first film was perfectly balanced. It was funny. This however was over the top. There are certain scenes that are very uncomfortable to watch as they try so hard to make you laugh. And as the ridiculousness accelerated, my gut began to churn and any smile that wanted to force it's way out to stay loyal to the first film was obliterated and all that was left was me,- insert summary here -.
Disappointment is too feeble of an explanation to how gutted i was at the way this film played out. So much of the first film was regurgitated. First couple of carbon copy moments i tried to ignore and enjoy but it eventually became so obvious and so desperate. The continual "by the beard of...", like quotations from Ron was tedious. And the shark....well i'll let you see that farcical moment for yourselves.
I tried, i really tried to enjoy this film, and yes, it had it's fair share of moments that made me laugh, but it is nothing more than a moneymaker. And it will do its job. But that doesn't stop it from being a massive let down. Sequels tend to work when they are planned, not when they are demanded.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाTo promote the movie, Will Ferrell appeared in character as Ron Burgundy anchoring several events, including Canadian Olympic curling trials, and a local North Dakota newscast. Ferrell was set to anchor ESPN's flagship program SportsCenter in character, but his appearance on the famed 6 PM EST of the program was canceled.
- गूफ़Ron is told by his doctor: "Looks as if both optic nerves are separated from their respective corneas .... No other way to put this, but you're blind". The optic nerve does not attach to the cornea, therefore a separation of the two is a normal finding and would not result in blindness. If the optic nerve separates from the retina, on the other hand, blindness ensues.
- भाव
Wes Mantooth: With the things I've done in my life, oh, I know I'm going to burn in hell. So I sure as shit ain't afraid to burn here on earth.
Ron Burgundy: Oh, my goodness! That's the most badass thing I've ever heard!
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटIn the "Super Sized R-Rated Version", there is an additional scene after the end credits with Brian Fantana and Champ Kind in a bar trying to pickup some girls while talking dirty to them.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनFive different cuts of the film exist, which was specially prepared for certain territories:
- The US Theatrical Version (running for around 119 mins)
- The UK/Australian Theatrical Version (running for around 118.5 mins)
- The International Theatrical Version (running for around 113 mins)
- The Extended Version (running for around 123 mins)
- The Super-Sized Version (running for around 143 mins)
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Film '72: 17 दिसम्बर 2013 को प्रसारित एपिसोड (2013)
- साउंडट्रैकRide Like The Wind
Written & Performed by Christopher Cross
Courtesy of Warner Bros. Records Inc.
By arrangement with Warner Music Group Film & TV Licensing
टॉप पसंद
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Al diablo con las noticias 2
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $5,00,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $12,73,52,707
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $2,62,32,425
- 22 दिस॰ 2013
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $17,36,49,931
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 59 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1