IMDb रेटिंग
6.8/10
5 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
इन्फोग्राफिक्स और अभिलेखीय फुटेज वैज्ञानिक सफलताओं, सामाजिक आंदोलनों और दुनिया को बदलने वाली खोजों पर सबक देते हैं.इन्फोग्राफिक्स और अभिलेखीय फुटेज वैज्ञानिक सफलताओं, सामाजिक आंदोलनों और दुनिया को बदलने वाली खोजों पर सबक देते हैं.इन्फोग्राफिक्स और अभिलेखीय फुटेज वैज्ञानिक सफलताओं, सामाजिक आंदोलनों और दुनिया को बदलने वाली खोजों पर सबक देते हैं.
- स्टार
एपिसोड ब्राउज़ करें
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Pros : Good Info graphics, Narrator's voice
Cons: Perspective, and sermonizing info along with inducing agenda. In the Nuclear episode - it calls other nations pursuing nuclear power as rogue nations when you can clearly see these so called 5 nations have already done 100's of tests themselves endangering the mankind in the name of power and protection.
Hypocrisy at its best.
Cons: Perspective, and sermonizing info along with inducing agenda. In the Nuclear episode - it calls other nations pursuing nuclear power as rogue nations when you can clearly see these so called 5 nations have already done 100's of tests themselves endangering the mankind in the name of power and protection.
Hypocrisy at its best.
Nice bitesize history lessons providing an overview of a variety of topics, without fixating on smaller details. It's an easier way to educate yourself on famous topics, and the use of infographics provide clarity. Some of the clips from the reel are a little irrelevant at time, plus it is fairly US-centric and occasionally questionable on objectivity, but still useful for a little background information.
First thing is the execution bad for your typical info feeding series? No. The show's host and flow are on par with anything you'd expect from the History or Discovery channel. However half the show's episode topics are very clearly selected topics to educate you on the show creator's biases. This includes feminism, plastics, nuclear energy, oil, and China. The China episode almost plays out like a love letter to China. They even go out of their way to jab at the USA's "messy Democracy." The nuclear power episode reaches out to make you fear nuclear fission but praises nuclear fusion. What they leave out is nuclear fusion requires so much energy it is not self sustaining like fission. The plastics episode jams it down our throats once again that plastics are evil. This is clearly history with a political agenda. If you're into these topics I say watch it. If you're tired of hearing someones political bias spun as fact skip it.
Everyone complaining it's American made is funny considering it's actually made in Britain, but has American narration. Also, of course all the negative reviews are complaining it's liberal, but I didn't find it to be biased. It's not the best, but I think it's aimed at younger viewers as most adults will watch similar shows on channels like History or Discovery.
First of all, 20 minutes is very little time for a documentary.
When I was a student at university, I always watched at least one documentary or documentary series after I came home. I haven't watched in a long time. I missed this.
This documentary is my style. I was even intrigued when I saw his name on Netflix.
The topics are well chosen. Like I said, 20 minutes is too little. I would prefer 1 hour. A documentary between "6" and "7" point in my opinion. It's not very good, but I don't think it's bad either. Even in a subject that does not interest me, it is not boring. These are my thoughts. But that's my opinion based on the first season. That's for sure, I'll be watching this series until it's over. Interesting. There are a few things I don't like. In particular, most of the things are told in America's perspective or American standards. Metric system, temperature system used in Americ, but not in Europe or the other continents. This is a little frustrating.
When I was a student at university, I always watched at least one documentary or documentary series after I came home. I haven't watched in a long time. I missed this.
This documentary is my style. I was even intrigued when I saw his name on Netflix.
The topics are well chosen. Like I said, 20 minutes is too little. I would prefer 1 hour. A documentary between "6" and "7" point in my opinion. It's not very good, but I don't think it's bad either. Even in a subject that does not interest me, it is not boring. These are my thoughts. But that's my opinion based on the first season. That's for sure, I'll be watching this series until it's over. Interesting. There are a few things I don't like. In particular, most of the things are told in America's perspective or American standards. Metric system, temperature system used in Americ, but not in Europe or the other continents. This is a little frustrating.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाIn June 2020, Netflix removed the Aids chapter, which covered the HIV and AIDS epidemic, after outrage from members of the Haitian-American community. In August 2020 the chapter was restored.
- साउंडट्रैकCrawling The Sky
Written by Miguel Moreno
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How many seasons does History 101 have?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- التاريخ 101
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि22 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें