एक आदमी का जीवन तब बदल जाता है जब उसे पता चलता है कि कुछ अशुभ घटनाएं हर दिन एक ही समय दोहराती है और ठीक दोपहर के दो बजकर बाईस मिनट पर खत्म होती हैं.एक आदमी का जीवन तब बदल जाता है जब उसे पता चलता है कि कुछ अशुभ घटनाएं हर दिन एक ही समय दोहराती है और ठीक दोपहर के दो बजकर बाईस मिनट पर खत्म होती हैं.एक आदमी का जीवन तब बदल जाता है जब उसे पता चलता है कि कुछ अशुभ घटनाएं हर दिन एक ही समय दोहराती है और ठीक दोपहर के दो बजकर बाईस मिनट पर खत्म होती हैं.
- पुरस्कार
- 1 जीत और कुल 2 नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
A story about mysterious set of events that continue happening to one man at 2:22 every single day. Michiel Huisman stars is an air traffic controller from New York losing his job after experiencing a weird flash of light causing him to blank out at 2:22. The plot tells about his experiencing more and more weird events at the same time after he meets a woman, played by Teresa Palmer. This appears being quite a unique idea for a film story overall it's not easy to understand what is exactly going on. Is it the movie the stars or about this guy? Is it something else? The full cast includes Sam Reid, Maeve Dermody, Remy Hii, and Simone Kessell. To sum up an original idea but the result is nothing more than a barely decent entertainment.
The star of this film are the screenwriters; Nathan and Stein, who take an incomplete idea and run with it. Unfortunately, when you rush, you sometimes make mistakes. This is one of those times. It is a real shame, and I am sure both writers will have a productive future. But this effort falls short due to the inability of the writers to clearly convey what they are writing about. The character of the air traffic controller is well-developed, but not anyone else. To get an effective chemistry for the audience, one must develop the TWO characters at the same time; not just one and then introduce another one much later. That device does not work, and helps to eventually ruin any connection the audience might have with the later character. This flaw is not the only reason the film is not successful. The premise of time travel (and this is a time travel film in the sense that Groundhog Day was a time travel film) is a difficult premise to work around as a film. Groundhog Day was successful because it had a great actor, Murray, and great comedy situations. This film has no sense of humor, nor does it have any sense of impending repeating events. The audience is intrigued, but then loses interest when there are no compelling examples before the final event of the phenomenon. A good try, but no cigar.
An American sci-fi drama; A story about an air traffic controller who is suspended from his job after a near miss incident, who starts to notice a reoccurence of the conditions that led to his suspension. Drawn into a complex relationship, he must figure out a way to control time itself. Pattern, repetition and predestination often feature in sci-fi fantasy movie plots, but when complicated ideas are ill-explained, it makes for difficult viewing for the circumspect viewer, even one prepared to suspend belief. The lead character is a poseur, a man of metropolitan cliché, rushing about carelessly - this runs in stark contrast to the traits one associates with an air traffic controller. The love story also feels unnatural. The stylisation of the film feels misplaced too with voiceovers that reduce the illusion further.
So I saw this movie on HBO Max and thought it would be perfect to watch on 2/22/22. And honestly, it was kind of underwhelming. The film follows Dylan, who has something bad happen to him every day at precisely 2:22 p.m. As the film goes on, it becomes clear that these events are somehow tied into a larger event that happened at 2:22 in either the past or the future or maybe even both ;). Overall it wasn't a terrible film, but it was nothing great either. At times I was kind of bored, and I never really cared about the characters. It wasn't the worst movie in the world, though, and there was nothing terrible about it. Just nothing great either. But I'm glad I watched it on 2/22/22. Not sure if I would recommend it, though.
This movie will frustrate you at the end, where you are expecting explanations and loose ends tied up, but no - only a lot of confusion that makes absolutely no sense.
Acting was amateur. Writing was worse, and in fairness is perhaps why the actors made such a poor impression on me.
This movie has no point! Zero!
Acting was amateur. Writing was worse, and in fairness is perhaps why the actors made such a poor impression on me.
This movie has no point! Zero!
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाDuring its one week theatrical release from June 30 to July 6, it only made $422, making it the lowest grossing film of 2017.
- गूफ़In the opening scenes of New York the Twin Towers are clearly visible. In a later scene of New York we see the One World Trade Center.
The first scene is in the dream. At that time in the dream, the twin towers still stood.
- साउंडट्रैकCool on Fire
Performed by Daniel Johns
Composed by Daniel Johns / Joel Little
Licensed by Sony/ATV Music Publishing (Australia) Pty Limited & EMI April Music Inc. Licensed by EMI Music Publishing Australia Pty Limited
Under license from Eleven: A Music Company Pty Ltd
Licensed courtesy of Universal Music Australia Pty Limited
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is 2:22?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- 2:22 - Thời Khắc Định Mệnh
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $422
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $294
- 2 जुल॰ 2017
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $39,45,729
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 38 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें