IMDb रेटिंग
4.0/10
3 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंFailing test scores, drunk teachers, and an extortionist principal; it's up to vice principal Tom to expose the principal's corruption and turn the school around before the school board shut... सभी पढ़ेंFailing test scores, drunk teachers, and an extortionist principal; it's up to vice principal Tom to expose the principal's corruption and turn the school around before the school board shuts them down.Failing test scores, drunk teachers, and an extortionist principal; it's up to vice principal Tom to expose the principal's corruption and turn the school around before the school board shuts them down.
Eva Longoria
- Rebecca Seabrook
- (as Eva Longoria Parker)
Hayes MacArthur
- Digdug O'Shaughnessy
- (as Hayes Macarthur)
Timothy Dowling
- Robber
- (as Tim Dowling)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
How do you have a cast like this and manage to cause a smirk or two during the whole thing? Did these actors owe someone a favor? Was it an "in" joke? Was it an April fools day prank? What happened here?????
Not wanting to sound as if I'm infringing your god given right to your First Amendment, I want to let you know that you may watch this film, but it's better if you find something else to watch (or do) instead. This film is just isn't worth your precious time.
The cast is star studded, but it didn't make the film enjoyable. With poor storyline, poor execution, and poor (or rather, non-existent) acting from the cast, this film is destined to be a disaster.
With figures of around $2m of budget, one would think that the film can be something better, but unfortunately it was not the case. I went through the thread discussion and found out that they'd have to sell heaps of DVDs to recover the cost. And based on how things go, I do not think they can ever break-even.
The only saving grace is Biggs, who have changed his character from being a nutter in his previous films, to somebody who can give substance and impact to the film. No more is he only known as the guy who f**ked a pizza.
As for Eva Longoria, I think she acted better in her previous film (Over Her Dead Body), and I hope she chooses her character carefully before committing herself.
All in all, not the best film around, and not a good film, as the film is aptly called.
The cast is star studded, but it didn't make the film enjoyable. With poor storyline, poor execution, and poor (or rather, non-existent) acting from the cast, this film is destined to be a disaster.
With figures of around $2m of budget, one would think that the film can be something better, but unfortunately it was not the case. I went through the thread discussion and found out that they'd have to sell heaps of DVDs to recover the cost. And based on how things go, I do not think they can ever break-even.
The only saving grace is Biggs, who have changed his character from being a nutter in his previous films, to somebody who can give substance and impact to the film. No more is he only known as the guy who f**ked a pizza.
As for Eva Longoria, I think she acted better in her previous film (Over Her Dead Body), and I hope she chooses her character carefully before committing herself.
All in all, not the best film around, and not a good film, as the film is aptly called.
Horrible watch, will not watch again, and actively recommend you avoid this movie.
This is the first movie where I felt the need to call child protective services and put all the adult actors involved on a watch list.
I'm just saying that some of the things these kids say, see, and in which they participate are potentially traumatizing, especially in the atmosphere they're performed. I'm sorry if this movie is supposed to be funny, but it's an awful story about awful subject matter, and none of the jokes land.
Even Jason Biggs calls out the inspector's use habits throughout the movie, and these are the people we're supposed to get behind. There is a difference between characters being silly and detrimental, and this movie is a great example of what crossing that line looks like.
Maybe it's just too real, maybe the idea of the circumstances of this movie being real is terrifying and I can't see the humor. Regardless, there is nothing I found funny about this movie, and the only redeemable acting came from a young Zachary Gordon ("Diary of a Wimpy Kid").
This is the first movie where I felt the need to call child protective services and put all the adult actors involved on a watch list.
I'm just saying that some of the things these kids say, see, and in which they participate are potentially traumatizing, especially in the atmosphere they're performed. I'm sorry if this movie is supposed to be funny, but it's an awful story about awful subject matter, and none of the jokes land.
Even Jason Biggs calls out the inspector's use habits throughout the movie, and these are the people we're supposed to get behind. There is a difference between characters being silly and detrimental, and this movie is a great example of what crossing that line looks like.
Maybe it's just too real, maybe the idea of the circumstances of this movie being real is terrifying and I can't see the humor. Regardless, there is nothing I found funny about this movie, and the only redeemable acting came from a young Zachary Gordon ("Diary of a Wimpy Kid").
"Lower Learning" is one of those annoying movies that thinks it's so much more clever than it actually is. The kind of movie that thinks every single line of dialogue is supposed to be a Tarantino-like one-liner that people will be repeating for the next couple of decades, we'll figure out less important stuff like plot and characters later on. Well, guess what: Mark Lafferty isn't quite Tarantino, and everything about this movie is so laughably forced that it almost becomes unwatchable. How long did it take these people to even find actors willing to utter lines like "we have to be as quiet as a fairy fart"? Honestly, just let that line sink in for a while. If that made the final script, I don't even want to think about what lines might have been cut (if any). If you can't write a decent line of dialogue to save your life, you probably shouldn't transform more than half of the scenes into long conversations that barely have anything to do with the actual story. Through the power of trial and error the movie does occasionally stumble into a territory where it's almost good (the "they get detention!" scene has a peculiar charm to it), but these moments are way too few and far apart to make me stop hating this movie. Garbage.
Well, a waste of Cordry, at least. I really wish the writers and editors hadn't been lazy for this film, it coulda been funny. It was fimed well but thats not saying much when the material was lacking. It was a series of throwaway dark skits. Like, maybe, a bunch of deleted Upright Citizen Brigade scenes, not quite ready for the big show. A lot of the little story ideas were good but when they were put together for a full length film, they just didn't seem to work. Try again, writer/director guy, but this time, maybe write a better outline and make sure you know what you want the the audience to feel and, most of all, write BETTER jokes.
क्या आपको पता है
- गूफ़When brainstorming with Tom Willoman, Rebecca Seabrook writes on the chalkboard an idea involving dragons. She misspells Komodo as kimodo.
- भाव
Turner Abernathy: I'm talking about a different kind of love. The kind of love that's wet and smells a little.
- साउंडट्रैकI'm in Edukashun
Written by Zach Selwyn
Performed by Zachariah
Courtesy of Papago Records and Desert Hobo Music (ASCAP)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Lower Learning?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $20,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $2,804
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $2,550
- 12 अक्टू॰ 2008
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $2,804
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 37 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें