गेम ऑफ थ्रोन्स की घटनाओं से दो सौ साल पहले, हाउस टार्गैरियन की कहानी को दर्शाया गया है.गेम ऑफ थ्रोन्स की घटनाओं से दो सौ साल पहले, हाउस टार्गैरियन की कहानी को दर्शाया गया है.गेम ऑफ थ्रोन्स की घटनाओं से दो सौ साल पहले, हाउस टार्गैरियन की कहानी को दर्शाया गया है.
- 1 प्राइमटाइम एमी जीते
- 19 जीत और कुल 90 नामांकन
एपिसोड ब्राउज़ करें
सारांश
Reviewers say 'House of the Dragon' is acclaimed for its storytelling, political intrigue, and Targaryen saga. Exceptional performances by Paddy Considine, Emma D'Arcy, and Matt Smith are highlighted. Stunning production design, elaborate costumes, and CGI dragons are praised. The show balances epic scale with intimate drama and stays true to George R. R. Martin's lore. However, some note pacing issues and lack of emotional connection.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I've been looking forward to House of the Dragon since the spin-off was first announced. The majority of the reviews and ratings have been great so that only enhanced my excitement. I told myself I'd be happy if it was half as good as the Game of Thrones and I can say that without a doubt that it is. While it's obviously not as good as the original (not much is) but it's definitely still a really good show that is one of the most successful shows on tv. It has the same Game of Thrones feel with all the action, drama, mystery, etc. People who don't like it either didn't want to because they hate everything or are comparing it to the original...don't. Just take it for what it is and that's a really good show! It was the most watched premiere in HBO history and has already been renewed for seasons 3 and 4. This is going to have a long run so I hope it continues to get better and better like the original did.
Season 1 was awesome. I was still defending the show untill this episode 6 of season 2. Enough is enough, the writers have no new ideas anymore, they don't follow the book and now this season is just super boring episode after episode. It's a Mexican soap opera now. I find it disgraceful. And it kinda is a bait and switch as well. They baited us with a very good season 1 just so they now use season 2 to push all their propaganda and personal beliefs. Is it so hard to follow the original story from the book?
The western world is having a really big writers Crisis in the entertainment industry.
Anyway, I might still keep watching this, but not with the same excitement as before. Might put it on just as background noise and go check it out when I hear a dragon. A shame.
The western world is having a really big writers Crisis in the entertainment industry.
Anyway, I might still keep watching this, but not with the same excitement as before. Might put it on just as background noise and go check it out when I hear a dragon. A shame.
I'd love to know who is giving this show a rating of 8 or 9?? This show has disappointed me to no end. Thinking it would atleast keep pace with GOT was a huge mistake. It's slow, boring even at times with the last 10 minutes of some episodes actually having some action. Let's face it if it wasn't for the dragon scenes in this show it would be a 5. Super disappointed so far through 2 seasons.
Storyline went from years passing in a couple episodes to mere weeks passing in 3-4 episodes. I'm wondering why the writers have decided to go this route? It's slowed the show down and made it down right boring. Hoping it gets better in season 3 but who knows.
Storyline went from years passing in a couple episodes to mere weeks passing in 3-4 episodes. I'm wondering why the writers have decided to go this route? It's slowed the show down and made it down right boring. Hoping it gets better in season 3 but who knows.
The first season was so good-amazing world-building, layered characters, and every episode built momentum until that unforgettable cliffhanger finale. Leaving me thinking that Game of Thrones is back!
But then came Season 2, and I couldn't help but ask: what went wrong?
Game of Thrones gave us some of the most fascinating female characters in TV history-Cersei, driven by trauma, ambition, and family; Daenerys, evolving from a powerless slave to a liberator and queen. These characters were complex, flawed, and compelling.
Now, we have a queen who complains about the men around her while making questionable decisions behind their backs. Instead of delving into the nuances of her choices, the writing reduces her to frustration when she's confronted. Meanwhile, Daemon-arguably the most captivating character-has been sidelined, left to have a mental break down. Aemond, who commands attention in every scene, has been reduced to barely any screen time even though every scene he's in is left with intensity.
It feels like the writing has lost its edge. I never thought I'd say it, but I'd rather rewatch Game of Thrones' final season than sit through this again. Season 2 deserves better writing, and so do we.
But then came Season 2, and I couldn't help but ask: what went wrong?
Game of Thrones gave us some of the most fascinating female characters in TV history-Cersei, driven by trauma, ambition, and family; Daenerys, evolving from a powerless slave to a liberator and queen. These characters were complex, flawed, and compelling.
Now, we have a queen who complains about the men around her while making questionable decisions behind their backs. Instead of delving into the nuances of her choices, the writing reduces her to frustration when she's confronted. Meanwhile, Daemon-arguably the most captivating character-has been sidelined, left to have a mental break down. Aemond, who commands attention in every scene, has been reduced to barely any screen time even though every scene he's in is left with intensity.
It feels like the writing has lost its edge. I never thought I'd say it, but I'd rather rewatch Game of Thrones' final season than sit through this again. Season 2 deserves better writing, and so do we.
Despite the high anticipation surrounding the series, it's unfortunate that the only captivating element is the presence of dragons. The actors lack charisma, failing to bring their characters to life in a way that engages the audience. This deficiency in performance makes it nearly impossible to form any emotional connections with the characters. The narrative, which could have been enriched by strong, memorable personalities, instead falls flat, leaving viewers disinterested and detached. The dragons, while visually impressive, aren't enough to carry the entire show and redeem its shortcomings.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe Iron Throne has been greatly redesigned from Game of Thrones (2011). It is larger and more asymmetrical to more closely match the description in George R.R. Martin's novels, although it is still nowhere near that big: the throne in the books is a 40-foot, immovable, asymmetrical behemoth made from 1000 swords welded together, with the seat 20 feet above the ground, and only accessible by a flight of stairs; the person sitting on it addresses people down below from 40 feet away.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटThe first season's title sequence is centered on a model of the Old Valyria citadel, with blood trails running across the land and marked by symbols of the Targeryn family.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- La casa del dragón
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें