Exposed: The Case of Keli Lane

Unfortunately ABC's Caro Meldrum-Hanna has put together a very one sided biased investigation obviously trying to paint the narrative of Keli Lane as being innocent. However she fails to address one major issue:

Why wouldn't Andrew Morris ( or Andrew Norris depending on Keli's memory) have come forward with baby Tegan if he actually existed? So we are left to assume this Andrew Norris person is either completely unaware that Keli is rotting in jail or he has some sort of grudge against her and so wants to punish her for some unknown reason. It's nonsense!

Keli is proven to be a compulsive liar, despite the female expert supposedly saying otherwise. Her story doesn't add up. The people that believe she is innocent are the same people who think Schpaelle Corby isn't a drug smuggler.

Did she get a fair trial? That's a fair question. Is she guilty? Absolutely no doubt . Females tend to believe that other females cannot do bad things so they look for any reason(s) to assume innocence even when it is obvious this person is telling major lies and is hiding something.

This was an excellent doco, really informative, yet I was left with so many unanswered questions. Andrew Norris, was obviously a name made up by both Keli and the father to conceal his identity. Why wasn't there more questions about him, where did he work? His Morher was mentioned but also no questions on her. Was this man a high profile person? Why on earth was keeping him a secret so important to Keli, so important that she was willing to sit in jail for 18years to keep the pact that was made? If that's what happened.

Again the documentary it's self was excellent, just so many more questions to be answered.

It's filmed quite well, however I've never cared so little about a documentary before. The entire first episode is predicated on asking a variety of people whether she was or was not pregnant during water polo season. It wears thin really fast and I can't help but feel so much of it could have been condensed considerably. You'll stop caring almost immediately.

A well put together documentary, revolving around a seriously unusual set of circumstances. This documentary appeared to be neutral throughout, asking questions from both sides. However, I have read since watching the series that the trial wasn't as flimsy as the doco suggests. Either way, it's definitely worth a watch.

Very one sided point of view using paid actors to offer 'new' evidence that the cops apparently missed. Justice has already been served in this case so I'm not sure why this was even necessary to film, the lady is clearly guilty and the argument this doco makes in trying to prove otherwise is so set up and fake that its hard to watch.