अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंCecilia and her son Martín have a car accident. On the third day after the crash, she wanders by herself on a lonely route and there is no clue of her son. She can't remember what happened d... सभी पढ़ेंCecilia and her son Martín have a car accident. On the third day after the crash, she wanders by herself on a lonely route and there is no clue of her son. She can't remember what happened during this time and she is desperately looking for her son. On her quest she finds coincid... सभी पढ़ेंCecilia and her son Martín have a car accident. On the third day after the crash, she wanders by herself on a lonely route and there is no clue of her son. She can't remember what happened during this time and she is desperately looking for her son. On her quest she finds coincidences with her case and other police files, which seem to be acts of a brutal hunting. The... सभी पढ़ें
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- पुरस्कार
- 1 जीत और कुल 2 नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
The rest of the film is an effort for this woman to find her memory of her son. A police investigation is happening at the same time as this woman tries to unlock her mind with a supernatural method. But, what is uncovered is more horrifying than having to face the disappearance of her son.
Unfortunately, the rest of the plot unfolds similar to the standard ideas of this type of film. Nothing really new or inventive. But, it is crafted well.
There is no sexuality and nudity in the film.
The narrative is disjointed and jumbled, and the movie is edited with no sense of cointinuity, the story (nothing new or surprising to begin with) feels like a succession of unrelated scenes.
There are plenty of random oniric-like sequences peppered with fx that look like something from a 60's B horror movie, but not in a good way.
Furthermore, there's little to no explanation for anything that the protagonists do, they just wander from one scene to the next doing things because the script demands it (minor spoiler: ten minutes into the movie and just after a quick exchange between them, the doctor decides to take his patient to... a psychic? Why was he so eager to help her, in the first place?. De-rigueur hypnotism session ensues and we have a glimpse into what the big reveal is going to be, and boy, is so cliche and trite, and done with the subtlety and technical prowess of an elementary school play).
Acting, maybe with the exception of Gerardo Romano and the two cameo-length appearances by Arturo Bonín and Rodolfo Ranni, is mediocre.
It could have been a little scary B horror movie with a 60's feel to it, but it ended up being almost like a satire.
1. A bunch of characters who seem pretty unrelated and you have no idea what they have to do with one another.
2. Either dubbing from Spanish, or a drunk audio engineer.
3. Make up your mind: is it a demon or vampire movie, or something completely different?
4. The first 90% of the film had nothing scary and no relevance.
I only gave it 5 stars because the "monster" looked good.
When I saw Del Toro films in the intro I was very hopeful, because Guillermo Del Toro is indeed one of my VERY favourite living directors. BUT... sadly, for some odd reason the story just did not want to gel in an effective way. The elements by themselves and especially the VERY effective mystery created from the beginning certainly seemed to promise a strong, Gothic film. But, and I'm not really sure why, it simply just did not come together in an effective way.
The visuals were very good, I really liked the lighting, the soundtrack, and even the acting was pretty decent across the board (with the one exception of the dopey policeman - I don't know WHERE the hell they dug him up) But, this is just one of those rather mysterious cases where you can't quite tell exactly what went wrong or precisely what the filmmakers did badly, since I feel taken in segments, the story seemed like it SHOULD have been very good. It's not like you can say, 'Oh, the acting is really bad', or 'The writing was poorly done', or 'The direction could have been done better' The reason is kind of uncertain as to why this didn't exactly work. The overall mood and atmosphere was created well. There was a palpable sense of Mystery right from the beginning which effectively draws the audience in, making them wonder what is going on. Even the ending was indeed surprising and not predictable at all. It SOUNDS like it should have worked, but somehow it really didn't...
The only thing I can come up with is a GUESS that perhaps just the way the story was plotted, or the pacing, or maybe the way the events were ordered. I honestly couldn't say.
I mean, the look and mood of the film was most definitely Del Toro, absolutely. But, ultimately the story just didn't work. So, I can't honestly recommend this movie despite its nice look and atmosphere. Perhaps there may be some people who are able to appreciate it more so at some level. But, like I've mentioned, to me personally, for some mysterious reason it just was not that effective.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe film title presumably is a nod to the Resurrection Of Christ. It may also be a reference to certain Vampire Lores in that it usually roughly takes three days for someone infected with Vampireism to be reborn a Nosferatu.
- भाव
Martin Garro: [on said vampire] Is It Now Gone?
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटAfter the credits Martin comes back to life as a vampire in front of Inspector Ventura moments before he is slain by vampires
टॉप पसंद
- How long is On the 3rd Day?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 25 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39:1