सीज़र के अत्याचार और रोम पर पूर्ण नियंत्रण से परेशान होकर, सीनेटर रुफ़स और कैसियस उसकी हत्या करने की साजिश रचते हैं.सीज़र के अत्याचार और रोम पर पूर्ण नियंत्रण से परेशान होकर, सीनेटर रुफ़स और कैसियस उसकी हत्या करने की साजिश रचते हैं.सीज़र के अत्याचार और रोम पर पूर्ण नियंत्रण से परेशान होकर, सीनेटर रुफ़स और कैसियस उसकी हत्या करने की साजिश रचते हैं.
Eye Haïdara
- Antonia
- (as Eye Haidara)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
If I'd have met the director in person, then I'll slap him harder as I could. Why did he make this? Don't have a level to rating this garbage.
But what in this case? Because this is history re-written - which I reckon is necessary to keep you interested. But you have to dig the humor and the comedy in the first place. Which might be quite tough to do - especially when the mixture and the tone is all over the place. Not sure if it has anything to do with the director also being the director.
So it sort of is - You directing too, Brutus? No pun intended - just stating a fact. Sort of - well you get the point I am certain of it. Now if you are willing to suspend your disbelief and have a heart for silly movies (that may not exactly know their place and what they want to tell you or how they want to entertain you) ... well you may have quite the fun with this.
So it sort of is - You directing too, Brutus? No pun intended - just stating a fact. Sort of - well you get the point I am certain of it. Now if you are willing to suspend your disbelief and have a heart for silly movies (that may not exactly know their place and what they want to tell you or how they want to entertain you) ... well you may have quite the fun with this.
Watched dubbed on Amazon. I did not laugh or find it entertaining.
It had no humor, no real action, it just went from scene to scene. It felt like a bad drama? Dramadey?
It was bad, not worth the time. I thought it would be full of dirty humor, it had none!
Oh, in this bland non-comedy it has lots of ahem, migrant types in Rome, in the military and so on.
So with a comedy it can get away with it, but this was not funny. I am NOT exaggerating when I said it had nothing funny.
1 out of 10. I must have seen 100 movies this year or so, this is definitely the worst.
It had no humor, no real action, it just went from scene to scene. It felt like a bad drama? Dramadey?
It was bad, not worth the time. I thought it would be full of dirty humor, it had none!
Oh, in this bland non-comedy it has lots of ahem, migrant types in Rome, in the military and so on.
So with a comedy it can get away with it, but this was not funny. I am NOT exaggerating when I said it had nothing funny.
1 out of 10. I must have seen 100 movies this year or so, this is definitely the worst.
I expected so much more from a very talented Kheiron. The script is really poor.. Ramzy Bedia as Julius Cesar was an enormous mistake. Too many references to spoof movies and fun cinema in general just didn't work in this film.. I was also bothered by too many guests invited in the cast.. some didn't have any purpose at all, some overplayed their role.. none had any depth in presence or script. Gerard Darmon is the only one that stood out.. it seems like here wrote and directed own parts.. I still like Kheiron on stage, in one man shows and in his personal and "dramatic" scenarios.. this type of humour should he left to others .. No that is said: ! congratulations to him on his third movie.. the two first ones were excellent so let's hope for more
Oh my God !... Shame on the writer(s) of this ridiculous boring under-movie.
Some of the actors are supposed to be good, and they once were. But retirement might have been a better idea than "playing" in this rotten tomatoes competitor.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Brutus vs César?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $85,00,000(अनुमानित)
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 27 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें