Sightless

An interesting and original psychological thriller. However, the ending left me feeling a little disappointed as this could have been so much better. The plus side? Kept me engrossed throughout, acting was decent, great suspenseful storyline and I really loved the cinematography which gave us a sense of what the main character was hearing, sensing and feeling. The down side? Way too many plot holes as we got towards the second half of the film and the ending was just downright lazy. A shame as this was definitely on the right route for most of the film, but I think they just ran out of ideas.

Great watch, would watch again, and do recommend.

Sensory handicap movies are a special niche, and they're usually pretty interesting. That doesn't mean that they're good, but they usually do something different and special.

For deaf movies, sometimes they'll do a POH (Point Of Hearing) from the main character to immerse you in the character's role, but it is very hard to do that for blindness as normally you would be looking at a black / white screen, though it works for partial blindess.

This movie handles it in a way I've never seen before, and it is fantastic. While Madelaine Petsch, and I'm a fan, carries this movie well and shows she's more than her role on "Riverdale", it is really the visual depiction of an amazing story that should make you watch this.

Ellen Ashland (Madelaine Petsch) is blinded by an attacker and her expensive violin gets stolen. Her estranged brother sets up a convenient downtown apartment for her and hires Clayton (Alexander Koch) to help her adjust to her new blindness. She starts hearing disturbances from the apartment next door.

I really love the idea of visualizing her blindness. The bird is great. My only suggestion is to go full-bore with this premise. The pictures and art should be blank unless she is otherwise told. Any fabric should not have prints. I like the blues. It takes some careful attention but this visualizing blindness really works. Now, the reveal isn't much of a surprise. By that time, one could bake a cake with all the bread crumps. It's still interesting. On the other hand, a couple of ideas don't add up. It doesn't make sense with the brother. One assumes that Ellen would recognize her own brother's voice. An easy fix would be a letter instead of a phone call. The other is Lana. There is no reason to inject her into the drama other than a writer's prerogative. I don't see her helping Ellen play the violin again and that's the only possible motive. It's one of those things that doesn't stand up to a little bit of scrutiny. Overall, this is interesting but it does have a few problems.

This movie wasn't great but not quite deserving of the 4 it has...There were a few plot holes that were not addressed by the end, like the whereabouts of certain people yet some aspects of the film are original. It's somewhat predictable but I still found myself surprised at certain parts. I give it a 5.5.

A slow burner with a twist at the end that makes the whole thing very unrealistic. I get what they were trying to say. It's like she said, perception is everything but if you really think about it, it just doesn't make sense. It's watchable but I can't recommend it.